Genome exploration and ecological competence are key to developing effective Pseudomonas-based biocontrol inoculants

References

• Anderson AJ, Kim YC. 2020. Insights into plant-beneficial traits of probiotic Pseudomonas chlororaphis isolates. J Med Microbiol. 69(3):361–371. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arseneault T, Goyer C, Filion M. 2015. Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM223 increases potato yield and reduces common scab symptoms in the field. Phytopathology. 105(10):1311–1317. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0358-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arseneault T, Roquigny R, Novinscak A, Goyer C, Filion M. 2020. Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid-producing Pseudomonas synxantha LBUM223 alters the transcriptome of Streptomyces scabies, the causal agent of potato common scab. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 110:101480. doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz U, Rehmani MS, Wang L, Luo X, Xian B, Wei S, Wang G, Shu K. 2021. Toward a molecular understanding of rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and spermosphere interactions in plant growth and stress response. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 40(6):479–500. doi:10.1080/07352689.2022.2031728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthazar C, Novinscak A, Cantin G, Joly DL, Filion M. 2021. Biocontrol activity of Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. against Botrytis cinerea and other cannabis fungal pathogens. Phytopathology. 112(3):549–560. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-03-21-0128-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangera MG, Thomashow LS. 1999. Identification and characterization of a gene cluster for synthesis of the polyketide antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol from Pseudomonas fluorescens Q2-87. J Bacteriol. 181(10):3155–3163. doi:10.1128/JB.181.10.3155-3163.1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret M, Morrissey JP, O’gara F. 2011. Functional genomics analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial traits involved in rhizosphere competence. Biol Fertil Soils. 47(7):729–743. doi:10.1007/s00374-011-0605-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal P, Llamas MA, Filloux A. 2018. Type VI secretion systems in plant-associated bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 20(1):1–15. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besset-Manzoni Y, Rieusset L, Joly P, Comte G, Prigent-Combaret C. 2018. Exploiting rhizosphere microbial cooperation for developing sustainable agriculture strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 25(30):29953–29970. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-1152-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biessy A, Novinscak A, Blom J, Léger G, Thomashow LS, Cazorla FM, Jošić D, Filion M. 2019. Diversity of phytobeneficial traits revealed by whole‐genome analysis of worldwide‐isolated phenazine‐producing Pseudomonas spp. Environ Microbiol. 21(1):437–455. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel, GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2021. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 49(W1):W29–35. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendel N, Partida-Martinez LP, Scherlach K, Hertweck C. 2007. A cryptic PKS–NRPS gene locus in the plant commensal Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 codes for the biosynthesis of an antimitotic rhizoxin complex. Org Biomol Chem. 5(14):2211–2213. doi:10.1039/B707762A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbane PG, Janik LJ, Tate ME, Warren RF. 1987. Revised structure for the phenazine antibiotic from Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 (NRRL B-15132). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 31(12):1967–1971. doi:10.1128/AAC.31.12.1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, van Themaat, EVL, Schulze-Lefert P. 2013. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 64(1):807–838. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole BJ, Feltcher ME, Waters RJ, Wetmore KM, Mucyn TS, Ryan EM, Wang G, Ul-Hasan S, McDonald M, Yoshikuni Y, et al. 2017. Genome-wide identification of bacterial plant colonization genes. PLoS Biol. 15(9):e2002860. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2002860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vrieze M, Varadarajan AR, Schneeberger K, Bailly A, Rohr RP, Ahrens CH, Weisskopf L. 2020. Linking comparative genomics of nine potato-associated Pseudomonas isolates with their differing biocontrol potential against late blight. Front Microbiol. 11:857. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhankhar R, Mohanty A, Gulati P. 2021. Microbial diversity of phyllosphere: exploring the unexplored. In: Verma A, Saini J, Hesham A Singh H, editors. Phytomicrobiome interactions and sustainable agriculture. 1st ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; pp. 66–90. doi:10.1002/9781119644798.ch5.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa‐urgel M. 2022. Connecting environmental and evolutionary microbiology for the development of new agrobiotechnological tools. Environ Microbiol. 25(1):87–90. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming H-C, Wingender J. 2010. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 8(9):623–633. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Sanz D, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Martín M, Rivilla R, Redondo-Nieto M. 2016. Genomic and genetic diversity within the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex. PLoS One. 11(2):e0150183. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghequire MGK, De Mot R. 2014. Ribosomally encoded antibacterial proteins and peptides from Pseudomonas. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 38(4):523–568. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross H, Loper JE. 2009. Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. Nat Prod Rep. 26(11):1408–1446. doi:10.1039/b817075b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross H, Stockwell VO, Henkels MD, Nowak-Thompson B, Loper JE, Gerwick WH. 2007. The genomisotopic approach: a systematic method to isolate products of orphan biosynthetic gene clusters. Chem Biol. 14(1):53–63. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.11.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haas D, Défago G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol. 3(4):307–319. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M. 2008. Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant Soil. 312(1):7–14. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9514-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse C, Schulz F, Bull CT, Shaffer BT, Yan Q, Shapiro N, Hassan KA, Varghese N, Elbourne LDH, Paulsen IT, et al. 2018. Genome‐based evolutionary history of Pseudomonas spp. Environ Microbiol. 20(6):2142–2159. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höfte M. 2021. The use of Pseudomonas spp. as bacterial biocontrol agents to control plant disease. In: Köhl J Ravensberg W, editors. Microbial bioprotectants for plant disease management. Cambridge, UK: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited; pp. 1–74. doi:10.19103/AS.2021.0093.11.
   Google Scholar
• Kawecki TJ, Lenski RE, Ebert D, Hollis B, Olivieri I, Whitlock MC. 2012. Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 27(10):547–560. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalucat J, Mulet M, Gomila M, García-Valdés E. 2020. Genomics in bacterial taxonomy: impact on the genus Pseudomonas. Genes. 11(2):139. doi:10.3390/genes11020139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legein M, Smets W, Vandenheuvel D, Eilers T, Muyshondt B, Prinsen E, Samson R, Lebeer S. 2020. Modes of action of microbial biocontrol in the phyllosphere. Front Microbiol. 11:1619. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindow SE, Brandl MT. 2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69(4):1875–1883. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling N, Wang T, Kuzyakov Y. 2022. Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions. Nat Commun. 13(1):836. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liszkay A, van der Zalm E, Schopfer P. 2004. Production of reactive oxygen intermediates (O2•−, H2O2, and •OH) by maize roots and their role in wall loosening and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 136(2):3114–3123. doi:10.1104/pp.104.044784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loper JE, Henkels MD, Shaffer BT, Valeriote FA, Gross H. 2008. Isolation and identification of rhizoxin analogs from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 by using a genomic mining strategy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74(10):3085–3093. doi:10.1128/AEM.02848-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrodi DV, Ksenzenko VN, Bonsall RF, Cook RJ, Boronin AM, Thomashow LS. 1998. A seven-gene locus for synthesis of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid by Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79. J Bacteriol. 180(9):2541–2548. doi:10.1128/JB.180.9.2541-2548.1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrodi OV, McWilliams JR, Peter JO, Berim A, Hassan KA, Elbourne LDH, LeTourneau MK, Gang DR, Paulsen IT, Weller DM, et al. 2021. Root exudates alter the expression of diverse metabolic, transport, regulatory, and stress response genes in rhizosphere Pseudomonas. Front Microbiol. 12:651282. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.651282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzola M, Cook RJ, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Pierson LS. 1992. Contribution of phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis to the ecological competence of fluorescent pseudomonads in soil habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 58(8):2616–2624. doi:10.1128/aem.58.8.2616-2624.1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 14(1):60. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 50(D1):D801–807. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk RA, Hossain SS, Haney CH. 2019. Convergent gain and loss of genomic islands drive lifestyle changes in plant-associated Pseudomonas. Isme J. 13(6):1575–1588. doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0372-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. 2010. DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol. 12(6):1513–1530. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02181.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgaard M, Blake C, Maróti G, Hu G, Wang Y, Strube ML, Át K. 2022. Experimental evolution of Bacillus subtilis on Arabidopsis thaliana roots reveals fast adaptation and improved root colonization. iScience. 25(6):104406. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen IT, Press CM, Ravel J, Kobayashi DY, Myers GSA, Mavrodi DV, DeBoy RT, Seshadri R, Ren Q, Madupu R, et al. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the plant commensal Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Nat Biotechnol. 23(7):873–878. doi:10.1038/nbt1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena M-H, Velázquez E. 2009. Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas. Infect Genet Evol. 9(6):1132–1147. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2009.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena M-H, Velázquez E. 2018. The current status on the taxonomy of Pseudomonas revisited: an update. Infect Genet Evol. 57:106–116. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneel M, Heyrman J, Adiobo A, De Maeyer K, Raaijmakers JM, De Vos P, Höfte M. 2007. Characterization of CMR5c and CMR12a, novel fluorescent Pseudomonas strains from the cocoyam rhizosphere with biocontrol activity. J Appl Microbiol. 103(4):1007–1020. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03345.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieterse CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SCM, Bakker PAHM. 2014. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 52(1):347–375. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada JM, Fernández M, Soriano MI, Barrientos-Moreno L, Llamas MA, Espinosa-Urgel M. 2016. Rhizosphere selection of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 variants with increased fitness associated to changes in gene expression. Environ Microbiol Rep. 8(5):842–850. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano I, Ventorino V, Pepe O. 2020. Effectiveness of plant beneficial microbes: overview of the methodological approaches for the assessment of root colonization and persistence. Front Plant Sci. 11:6. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquigny R, Novinscak A, Arseneault T, Joly DL, Filion M. 2018. Transcriptome alteration in Phytophthora infestans in response to phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain LBUM223. BMC Genomics. 19(1):474. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4852-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santamaría‐hernando S, De Bruyne L, Höfte M, Ramos‐gonzález M. 2022. Improvement of fitness and biocontrol properties of Pseudomonas putida via an extracellular heme peroxidase. Microb Biotechnol. 15(10):2652–2666. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacher C, Hampe A, Porté AJ, Sauer U, Compant S, Morris CE. 2016. The phyllosphere: microbial jungle at the plant–climate interface. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 47(1):1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032238.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent MN, Harrison LA, Brackin JM, Kovacevich PA, Mukerji P, Weller DM, Pierson EA. 1991. Genetic analysis of the antifungal activity of a soilborne Pseudomonas aureofaciens strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 57(10):2928–2934. doi:10.1128/aem.57.10.2928-2934.1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorholt JA. 2012. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 10(12):828–840. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller DM. 2007. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology. 97(2):250–256. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-97-2-0250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R, Dhillon BK, Shay JA, Brinkman FSL. 2016. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(D1):D646–653. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zboralski A, Biessy A, Filion M. 2022. Bridging the gap: type III secretion systems in plant-beneficial bacteria. Microorganisms. 10(1):187. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10010187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zboralski A, Biessy A, Savoie M-C, Novinscak A, Filion M. 2020. Metabolic and genomic traits of phytobeneficial phenazine-producing Pseudomonas spp. are linked to rhizosphere colonization in Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum tuberosum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 86(4): e02443-19. doi:10.1128/AEM.02443-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zboralski A, Filion M. 2020. Genetic factors involved in rhizosphere colonization by phytobeneficial Pseudomonas spp. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 18:3539–3554. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar