Field resistance to the potato leafroll luteovirus in transgenic and somaclone potato plants reduces tuber disease symptoms

References

• Barker , H. and Harrison , B. D. 1985 . Restricted multiplication of potato leafroll virus in resistant potato genotypes . Ann. Appl. Biol. , 107 : 205 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker , H. , Reavy , B. , Kumar , A. , Webster , K. D. and Mayo , M. A. 1992 . Restricted virus multiplication in potatoes transformed with the coat protein gene of potato leafroll luteovirus: similarities with a type of host gene-mediatedresistance . Ann. Appl. Biol. , 120 : 55 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker , H. , Webster , K. D. , Jolly , C. A. , Reavy , B. , Kumar , A. and Mayo , M. A. 1994 . Enhancement of resistance to potato leafroll virus multiplication in potato by combining the effects of host genes and transgenes . Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. , 7 : 528 – 530 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap , W. R. , Corsini , D. , Pavek , J. J. , Snyder , G. W. , Rockhold , D. R. and Vayda , M. E. 1994 . Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes . Am. Potato J. , 71 : 285 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernatzky , R. and Tanksley , S. D. 1986 . Genetics of actinrelated sequences in tomato . Theor. Appl. Genet. , 72 : 314 – 321 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran , W. G. and Cox , G. M. 1957 . Experimental Designs , 2nd ed. , London : John Wiley and Sons, Inc. . 611 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dale , P. J. and McPartlan , H. C. 1992 . Field performance of transgenic potato plants compared with controls regenerated from tuber discs and shoot cuttings . Theor. Appl. Genet. , 84 : 585 – 591 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bokx , J. A. 1967 . The callose test for the detection of leafroll virus in potato tubers . Eur. Potato J. , 10 : 221 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• Harrison , B. D. 1984 . “ Potato leafroll virus. No. 339 ” . In Descriptions of Plant Viruses , Kew, Surrey, England : Commonw. Mycol. Inst./Assoc. Appl. Biol. . 6 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kawchuk , L. M. , Martin , R. R. and McPherson , J. 1990 . Resistance in transgenic potato expressing the potato leafroll virus coat protein gene . Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. , 3 : 301 – 307 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawchuk , L. M. , Martin , R. R. and McPherson , J. 1991 . Sense and antisense RNA-mediated resistance to potato leafroll virus in Russet Burbank potato plants . Mol. Plant- Microbe Interact. , 4 : 247 – 253 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawchuk , L. M. , Martin , R. R. , Rochon , D. M. and McPherson , J. 1989 . Identification and characterization of the potato leafroll virus putative coat protein gene . J. Gen. Virol. , 70 : 783 – 788 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keese , P. , Martin , R. R. , Kawchuk , L. M. , Waterhouse , P. M. and Gerlach , W. L. 1990 . Nucleotide sequences of an Australian and a Canadian isolate of potato leafroll luteovirus and their relationships with two European isolates . J. Gen. Virol. , 71 : 719 – 724 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi , M. and Tlaskal , J. 1974 . Fiji disease resistant Saccharum officinarum var. Pinder subclones from tissue cultures . Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. , 15 : 130 – 137 .
   Google Scholar
• Mayo , M. A. , Robinson , D. J. , Jolly , C. A. and Hyman , L. 1989 . Nucleotide sequence of potato leafroll luteovirus RNA . J. Gen. Virol. , 70 : 1037 – 1051 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickell , L. G. and Heinz , D. J. 1973 . “ Potential of cell and tissue culture techniques as aids in economic plant improvement ” . In Genes, Enzymes, and Populations , Edited by: Srb , A. M. 109 – 128 . New York : Plenum .
   Google Scholar
• Presting , G. G. , Smith , O. P. and Brown , C. R. 1995 . Resistance to potato leafroll virus in potato plants transformed with the coat protein gene or with vector control constructs . Phytopathology , 85 : 436 – 442 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook , J. , Fritsch , E. F. and Maniatis , T. 1989 . Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual , New York : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory .
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 1989 . SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6 , 4th ed. , Cary, N.C. : SAS Institute Inc. . 1686 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard , J. F. , Bidney , D. and Shahin , E. 1980 . Potato protoplasts in crop improvement . Science , 28 : 17 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Southern , E. M. 1975 . Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis . J. Mol. Biol. , 98 : 503 – 517 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachel , S. E. , Timmerman , B. and Zambryski , P. 1986 . Generation of single-stranded T-DNA molecules during the initial stages of T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells . Nature , 322 : 706 – 712 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuring , R. W. J. , Sanders , J. P. M. and Borst , P. 1975 . A freeze-squeeze method for recovering long DNA from agarose gels . Anal. Biochem. , 66 : 213 – 220 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wilk , F. , Huisman , M. J. , Cornelissen , B. J. C. , Huttinga , H. and Goldbach , R. 1989 . Nucleotide sequence and organization of potato leafroll virus genomic RNA . FEBS Letters , 245 : 51 – 56 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wilk , F. , Willink , D. P.-L. , Huisman , M. J. , Huttinga , H. and Goldbach , R. 1991 . Expression of the potato leafroll luteovirus coat protein gene in transgenic potato plants inhibits viral infection . Plant Mol. Biol. , 17 : 431 – 439 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , K. , Herrera-Estrella , L. , Van Montagu , M. and Zambryski , P. 1984 . Right 25 bp terminus sequence of the nopaline T-DNA is essential for and determines the direction of DNA transfer from Agrobacterium to the plant genome . Cell , 38 : 455 – 462 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse , P. M. , Gildow , F. E. and Johnstone , G. R. 1988 . “ Luteovirus group. No. 339 ” . In Descriptions of Plant Viruses , Kew, Surrey, England : Commonw. Mycol. Inst./Assoc. Appl. Biol. . 9 pp.
   Google Scholar