Social Categories, Shared Experience, Reciprocity and Endangered Meanings: Examples from Koromu (PNG)

References

• Danziger E 2001 Relatively Speaking: language, thought, and kinship among the Mopan Maya Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield NJ 2007 ‘Meanings of the unmarked: how 'default' person reference does more than just refer’ in NJ Enfield & T Stivers (eds) Person Reference in Interaction: linguistic, cultural and social perspectives Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield NJ & SC Levinson 2006 ‘Introduction: human sociality as a new interdisciplinary field’ in SC Levinson & NJ Enfield (eds) Roots of Human Sociality: culture, cognition and interaction London: Berg. pp. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Evans N 2007 ‘Why we need many languages to understand language: Indo-Pacific languages and the typology of reciprocal constructions. Presentation at ANU, Canberra, 14 September.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard C 2010 ‘Semantic molecules and semantic complexity (with special reference to “environmental molecules”)’ Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8(1): 123–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard CG & A Wierzbicka 1997 ‘Discourse and culture’ in TA van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction London: Sage Publications. pp. 231–257.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard CG & A Wierzbicka 2002 Meaning and Universal Grammar: theory and empirical findings Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard C & A Wierzbicka 2008 ‘New semantic primes and new syntactic frames: “specificational BE” and “abstract THIS/IT”’ in C Goddard (ed.) Cross-Linguistic Semantics Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard C & A Wierzbicka in press ‘Men, women and children’ in C Goddard & A Wierzbicka (eds) Words and Meanings Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey A 1975 Language Learner's Field Guide Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Lancy DF & A Strathern 1981 ‘“Making twos”: pairings as an alternative to the taxonomic mode of representation’ American Anthropologist 83(4): 773–795. 10.1525/aa.1981.83.4.02a00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence P 1984 The Garia: an ethnography of a traditional cosmic system in Papua New Guinea Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levisen C & C Priestley forthcoming ‘Culture, cognition, and creolization: A study in Kastom and related Melanesian sociality concepts’ presented at the 13th International Pragmatics Conference, New Delhi, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Merlan F & A Rumsey 1985 ‘Ku Waru Shared Experience Names’ Unpublished offcut from an early draft of Ku Waru: Language and Segmentary Politics in the western Nebilyer Valley, Papua New Guinea Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock GP, CS Ford, AE Hudson, R Kennedy, LW Simmons & JWM Whiting 1971[1938] Outline of Cultural Materials New Haven (Yale): Human Relations Area Files. For the most recent 2004 version Available at: http://www.yale.edu/hraf/collections.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pawley A 2011 A Dictionary of Kalam with Ethnographic Notes Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley C 1975–1980a Chronological File on Koromu Language and Culture Unpublished notes based on topics in GP Murdock et al and A Healey.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley C 1975–1980b Topical File on Koromu language and Culture, with some sections on initiation by Ian Priestley Unpublished notes based on topics in GP Murdock et al and A Healey.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley C 2008/2009 A grammar of Koromu (Kesawai), a Trans New Guinea language of Papua New Guinea PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley C forthcoming a Koromu: a Papuan language of Kesawai and nearby villages Berlin: The Pacific Linguistics Series, Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley C forthcoming b What's in a name? Personal reference expressions and cultural scripts in Koromu (PNG).
   Google Scholar
• Read KR 1965 The High Valley London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stasch R 2002 ‘Joking avoidance: a Korowai pragmatics of being two’ American Ethnologist 29(2): 335–365. 10.1525/ae.2002.29.2.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern A 1977 ‘Shorter communications: Melpa food-names as an expression of ideas on identity and substance’ The Journal of the Polynesian Society 86(4): 503–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern M 1988 The Gender of the Gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka A 1997 Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka A 2009 ‘“Reciprocity”: an NSM approach to linguistic typology and social universals’ Studies in Language 33(1): 103–174. 10.1075/sl.33.1.05wie
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka A 2010 ‘‘Eating’ and ‘drinking’ in Kalam’ in J Bowden, NP Himmelmann & M Ross (eds) A Journey through Austronesian and Papuan Linguistic and Cultural Space: papers in honour of Andrew Pawley Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. pp. 651–660.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka A forthcoming. Back to ‘father’ and ‘mother’: Overcoming the Eurocentrism of kinship semantics through eight universal semantic molecules.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L 1953 Philosophical Investigations Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar