Intersubjectivity or Preference: Interpreting Student Pauses in Supervisory Meetings

References

• Atkinson JM & P Drew 1979 Order in Court: the organization of verbal interaction in judical settings Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson JM & J Heritage (eds) 1984 Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden GB, J Mandelbaum & S Wilkinson 2012 ‘Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(2): 137–155. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.673380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker D 2012 Okay? yeah? right?: negotiating understanding and agreement in master's supervision meetings with international students Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stirling, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cargill M 2000 ‘Intercultural postgraduate supervision meetings: an exploratory discourse study’ Prospect 15(2): 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang S-Y 2011 ‘Pursuing a response in office hour interactions between US college students and international teaching assistants’ Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3316–3330. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson J 1984 ‘Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection’ in JM Atkinson & J Heritage (eds) Structures of social action Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 102–128.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan S 1972 ‘Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23: 283–92. doi: 10.1037/h0033031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner R 2001 When listeners talk: response tokens and listener stance Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner R 2004 ‘On delaying the answer: question sequences extended after the question’ in R Gardner & J Wagner (eds) Second language conversations London: Continuum. pp. 246–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie A & F Cornish 2010 ‘Intersubjectivity: towards a dialogical analysis’ Journal for the theory of social behaviour 40(1): 19–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C 1981 Conversational organization: interaction between speakers and hearers New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C & J Heritage 1990 ‘Conversation analysis’ Annual review of anthropology 19: 283–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J 1984 ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement’ in JM Atkinson & J Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 299–345.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J 2006 ‘Preference, pre-sequences and the timing of social solidarity’ in P Drew & J Heritage (eds) Conversation analysis Vol 2 London: Sage. pp. 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J 2007 ‘Intersubjectivity and progressivity in references to persons (and places)’ in NJ Enfield & T Stivers (eds) Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural and social perspectives Cambridge: CUP. pp. 255–280.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J 2009 ‘Conversation analysis as social theory’ in BS Turner (ed.) The New Blackwell companion to social theory Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 300–320.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J 2012a ‘The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J 2012b ‘Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J & G Raymond 2005 ‘The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction’ Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby I & R Wooffitt 2008 Conversation analysis Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon A 1967 ‘Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction’ Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S & Seale C 2007 ‘Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: a qualitative case study’ Studies in Higher Education 32(4): 511–526. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz A 1984a ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes’ in JM Atkinson & J Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 57–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz A 1984b ‘Pursuing a response’ in JM Atkinson & J Heritage (eds) Structures of social action Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 152–163.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas G 1995 Conversation analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond G 2003 ‘Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding’ American Sociological Review 68(6): 939–967. doi: 10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond G & J Heritage 2006 ‘The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren’ Language in Society 35(5): 677. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JD 2013 ‘Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: the case of partial questioning repeats’ in M Hayashi, G Raymond & J Sidnell (eds) Conversational repair and human understanding Vol 30 Cammbridge: Cambrige University Press. pp. 261–292.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1987 ‘On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation’ in G Button & JRE Lee (eds) Talk and social organisation Vol 54 Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. pp. 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1992 Lectures on conversation Vols 1&2 Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H, EA Schegloff & G Jefferson 1974 ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’ Language 50(4): 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA 1992 ‘Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’ American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA 1998 ‘Body torque’ Social Research 65(3): 535–596.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA, G Jefferson & H Sacks 1977 ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation’ Language 53:361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelt L 2006 See what I mean: hearing loss, gaze and repair in conversation Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian National University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers T & F Rossano 2010 ‘Mobilizing response’ Research on Language & Social Interaction 43(1): 3–31. doi: 10.1080/08351810903471258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svinhufvud K & S Vehviläinen 2013 ‘Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter’ Text & Talk 33(1): 139–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen S 2009a ‘Problems in the research problem: criticism and resistance in academic supervision encounters’ Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 6(2): 185–201. doi: 10.1080/00313830902757592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen S 2009b ‘Student-initiated advice in academic supervision’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2): 163–190. doi: 10.1080/08351810902864560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar