References
- Barton A 1999 Prank calls: plague or purpose? Kids Helplines Newsletter, March.
- Butler CW & A Weatherall 2006 ‘“No we're not playing families”. Membership categorization and children's play’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4): 441–470. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_4
- Danby S, CD Baker & M Emmison 2005 ‘Four observations in openings on calls to Kids Line’ in CD Baker, M Emmison & A Firth (eds) Calling for Help: language and social interaction in telephone helplines Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. pp. 133–151.
- Emmison M & S Danby 2007 ‘“Who's the friend in the background?” Interactional strategies in determining authenticity in calls to a national children's helpline’ Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30(1): 1–17.
- Garfinkel H 1963 ‘A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions’ in OJ Harvey (ed.) Motivation and Social Interaction: cognitive approaches New York: Ronald Press. pp. 187–238.
- Garfinkel H 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Heritage J 1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Heritage J 2013 ‘Epistemics in conversation’ in T Stivers & J Sidnell (eds) Handbook of Conversation Analysis Cambridge, UK: Wiley Blackwell. pp. 370–396.
- Hester S & P Eglin 1997 (eds) Culture-in-action: studies in membership categorisation analysis Washington, DC: University Press of America.
- Jefferson G 2004 ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction’ in GH Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis Studies from the First Generation Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 13–34.
- Lamp, The 2013 Prank call with tragic consequence. 70(1): 30–31. Available at: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=169171302068074;res=IELHEA accessed 6 May 2015.
- Peräkylä A, C Antaki, S Vehvilainen & I Leudar (eds) 2008 Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Robinson JD 2003 ‘An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patient participation’ Health Communication 15(1): 27–59. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2
- Sacks H 1972 ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology’ in D Dusnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction New York: Free Press. pp. 31–74.
- Sacks H 1992 Lectures on Conversation Vols. I and II. G. Jefferson (ed.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Schegloff EA 1992 ‘Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’ American Journal of Sociology 97: 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
- Schegloff EA 2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: a primer in conversation analysis vol. 1 New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Seilheimer MF 2011 ‘On doing ‘being a crank caller’: a look into the crank call community of practice’ Journal of Pragmatics 43: 677–690. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.005
- Stivers T 2005 ‘Modified repeats: one method of asserting primary rights from second position’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 38: 131–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
- Stokoe E 2012 ‘Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: methods for systematic analysis’ Discourse Studies 14: 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534