Accomplishing a Continuing Relationship in Psychotherapy: Updates and the Role of Time References

References

• Antaki C & A Jahoda 2010 ‘Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session ‘on-track’ in the face of clients’ ‘off-track’ talk’ Communication & Medicine 7: 11–21. doi: 10.1558/cam.v7i1.11
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, JM & J Heritage (eds) 1984 Structures in Social Action: studies in conversation analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broe V 2003 ‘Skip-connecting as a means for maintaining coherence—an aspect of the sequential organisation of talk’ Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35: 160–185. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2003.10416077
   Google Scholar
• Budge SL & BE Wampold 2015 ‘The relationship: how it works’ in OCG Gelo, A Pritz & B Rieken (eds) Psychotherapy Research Vienna: Springer-Verlag. pp. 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Button G 1991 ‘Conversation-in-a-series’ in D Boden and DH Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 251–277.
   Google Scholar
• Clark S 2009 Getting personal: talking the psychotherapy session into being PhD Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D 1997 Discourse and Cognition London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D 1999 ‘Emotion discourse’ Culture and Psychology 5: 271–291. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9953001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvins R & J Green 2008 ‘The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: an empirical review’ Clinical Psychology Review 28: 1167–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmison M & S Danby 2007 ‘Troubles announcements and reasons for calling: initial actions in opening sequences in calls to a national children's helpline’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 40: 63–87. doi: 10.1080/08351810701331273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield NJ & T Stivers 2007 Person Reference in Interaction: linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner R 2001 When Listeners Talk Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin MH & C Goodwin 1987 ‘Children's arguing’ in S Philips, S Steele and C Tanz (eds) Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 200–248.
   Google Scholar
• Heath C 1981 ‘The opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction’ in P Atkinson and C Heath (ed) Medical Work: realities and routines Westmead: Gower. pp. 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J & J Robinson 2006 ‘The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: physicians’ opening questions’ Health Communication 19: 89–102. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson RF 1985 Forms of Feeling London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO & L Luborsky 1993 ‘The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61: 561–573. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE 2009 ‘Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change’ Psychotherapy Research 19: 418–428. doi: 10.1080/10503300802448899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE & JR Weisz 2003 Evidence-based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov W & D Fanshel 1977 Therapeutic Discourse: psychotherapy as conversation New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ & DE Barley 2001 ‘Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome’ Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 38: 357–361. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares R 2005 The Metaphor of Play London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl P & AO Horvath 2014 ‘“I can see some sadness in your eyes”: when experiential therapists notice a client's affectual display’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 47: 89–108. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.900212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä A, C Antaki & S Vehviläinen, et al. 2008 Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J 1998 ‘Getting down to business: talk, gaze and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations’ Health Communication 25: 97–123.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J 2006 ‘Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns’ in J Heritage and DW Maynard (eds) Communication in Medical Care Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 22–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1984 ‘Notes on methodology’ in J Atkinson and J Heritage (eds) Structures in Social Action: studies in conversation analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1986 ‘Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations’ Poetics 15: 127–138. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1987 ‘You want to find out if anybody really does care’ in G Button and JRE Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. pp. 219–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1992a Lectures on Conversation Vol 1 Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H 1992b Lectures on Conversation Vol 2 Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA 1972 ‘Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place’ in D Sudnow (ed) Studies in Social Interaction New York: The Free Press. pp. 75–119.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA 1986 ‘The routine as achievement’ Human Studies 9: 111–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00148124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA 2000 ‘On granularity’ Annual Review of Sociology 26: 715–720. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles WB, L Honos-Webb & M Surko 1998 ‘Responsiveness in psychotherapy’ Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice 5: 439–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers T 2002 ‘Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters: “symptoms only” versus “candidate diagnosis” presentations’ Health Communication 14: 299–338. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1403_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen S 2003 ‘Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction’ Text 23: 573–606.
   Google Scholar
• Voutilainen L, A Perakyla & J Ruusuvuori 2010 ‘Recognition and interpretation: responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 85–107. doi: 10.1080/08351810903474799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakin MA & DH Zimmerman 1999 ‘Reduction and specialization in emergency and directory assistance calls’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 409–437. doi: 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold BE 2001 The Great Psychotherapy Debate: models, methods and findings Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wampold BE 2007 ‘Psychotherapy: the humanistic (and effective) treatment’ American Psychologist 62: 857–873. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SJ, MH Stubbe & LM Macdonald, et al. 2013 ‘Framing the consultation: the role of the referral in surgeon–patient consultations’ Health Communication 29: 74–80. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.718252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar