When past meets future in Persian: A construction grammar approach to futurity

References

• Amouzadeh, M. (2006). Pragmatic perspectives on the preterite in Persian. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University, 23(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Anvari, H., & Givi, H. A. (2016). Dæsture zæbɑne fɑrsi [Persian grammar 2] (4th ed.). Fatemi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Arjang, G. (2016). Dæsture zæbɑne fɑrsie emruz [Contemporary Persian grammar]. Ghatreh Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, C. (1982). Aspect and aktionsart: Towards a semantic distinction. Journal of Linguistics, 18(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, C. (1994). Verbal categories, form-meaning relationships and the English perfect. In C. Bache, H. Basbøl, & C. E. Lindberg (Eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology (pp. 43–60). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, C. (1997). The study of aspect, tense and action. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bergs, A. (2010). Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000067
   Google Scholar
• Boas, H. C. (2013). Cognitive construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 233–254). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R. D. (1991). Back to the future. In E. C. Traugott & W. B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II (pp. 17–58). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davari, S., & Naghzguye-Kohan, M. (2016). Æz erɑde tɑ ɑyænde: Dæsturi ʃodegie zæmɑne ɑyænde dær fɑrsi [From volition to future: The grammaticalization of “Future Tense” in Persian]. Zabanshenakht, 7(13), 59–87.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck, R. (2006). The grammar of the English verb phrase, vol. 1: The grammar of the English tense system: A comprehensive analysis. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2006). Mood and modality in English. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 269–290). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Drude, S. (2008). Tense, aspect and mood in Awetí verb paradigms: Analytic and synthetic forms. In K. D. Harrison, D. S. Rood, & A. Dwyer (Eds.), Lessons from documented endangered languages (pp. 67–109). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. R. (2000). Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalization of reality. Linguistic Typology, 4(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55
   Google Scholar
• Emadi, N. (2013). Tense and mood in Persian and English: A contrastive and error analysis [Doctoral Thesis]. University of Malaya.
   Google Scholar
• Enç, M. (1996). Tense and modality. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 345–358). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, M. M. (2018). Zæmɑne ɑyænde dær guyeʃhɑye æbyɑne-ʔi væ tore-ʔi [Future tense in Abyaneh and Torreh dialects]. Journal of Iranian Languages and Dialects, 6(1), 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Farshidvard, K. (2013). Dæsture moxtæsære tarixie zæbɑne farsi [The brief historical grammar of Persian]. Zavar Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The mechanisms of ‘construction grammar’. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794
   Google Scholar
• Fried, M., & Östman, J. (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A., & Suttle, L. (2010). Construction grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotti, M. (2003). Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug, & F. R. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 267–300). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
   Google Scholar
• Heine, B. (1995). On the German werden future. In W. Abraham, T. Givón, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse, grammar and typology (pp. 119–138). John Benjamins Publishing company.
   Google Scholar
• Hilpert, M. (2008). Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, E. (1986). Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics & Philosophy, 9(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, C. (2008). Expressions of future in classical and modern new Persian. In S. Karimi, D. Stilo, & V. Samiian (Eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics (pp. 153–175). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jaszczolt, K. M. (2009). Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. (2000). Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Ö Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 27–187). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kangasmaa-Minn, E. (1984). Tense, aspect and Aktionsarten in Finno-Ugrian. In C. de Groot & H. Tommola (Eds.), Aspect bound: A voyage into the realm of Germanic, Slavonic and Finno-Ugrian Aspectology (pp. 77–93). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what's X doing Y? Construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/417472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (2009). Concepts of time. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 5–38). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S. T., & Porter, P. (2002). Tense and time. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Volume 7) (pp. 277–346). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, J. (2000). The perfect – aspectual, temporal, and evidential. In Ö Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 365–384). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics 1 & 2. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action (pp. 101–124). John Wiley & sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J. E. (2008). The syntactic nature of inner aspect: A minimalist perspective. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mahootian, S., & Gebhardt, L. (1997). Persian: Descriptive grammars. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matić, D., & Nikolaeva, I. (2014). Realis mood, focus, and existential closure in Tundra Yukaghir. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 150, 202–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazinani, A. (2016). Sɑxte æfʔɑle guyeʃe mæzinɑni: Poli æz pæhlævi be fɑrsie moʔɑser [Verb construction in Mazinani dialect: A bridge from Pahlavi to New Persian]. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 8(14), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.22067/LJ.V8I14.44207
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis, L. A. (2006). Time and tense. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 220–234). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Naghzguye-Kohan, M. (2009). Bærræsie færɑyænde dæsturi ʃodegi dær zæbɑne fɑrsi [Investigating grammaticalization in modern Persian]. Dastur, 3(1), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Byrne, J. A. (2017). The systematic elements underlying the expression of futurity in English: An ESL perspective [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, J. O., & Fried, M. (Eds.). (2005). Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (Vol. 3). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, F. R. (2003). Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug, & F. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 1–17). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimian, J. (1997). Næqʃ-hɑye piʃvænde feʔlie mi- dær zæbane fɑrsie emruz [The roles of the prefix mi- in modern Persian]. Journal of Sociology and Humanity, 13(1), 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rezayati Kishekhaleh, M., & Ebrahimi Dinani, A. (2016). Feʔle ɑyænde dær zæbɑn-hɑ væ guyeʃ-hɑye irɑni [The future tense of the verbs in Iranian languages and dialects]. Journal of Persian Language and Iranian Dialects, 1(1), 7–26. 20.1001.1.65852476.1395.1.1.2.0
   Google Scholar
• Silva Sinha, V. (2019). Event-based time in three indigenous Amazonian and Xinguan cultures and languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(454), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. S. (2008). Time with and without tense. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), Time and modality (pp. 227–249). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taleghani, A. H. (2008). Modality, aspect and negation in Persian. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tavangar, M., & Amouzadeh, M. (2006). Deictic projection: An inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian. Studia Linguistica, 60(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness [Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation]. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Ultan, R. (1978). The nature of future tenses. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 83–123). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wekker, H. C. (1976). The expression of future time in contemporary British English: An investigation into the syntax and semantics of five verbal constructions expressing futurity. North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Windfuhr, G. L. (1979). Persian grammar: History and state of its study. Mouton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yavaʂ, F. (1982). Future reference in Turkish. Linguistics, 20, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1982.20.5-6.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar