The design speculation and action research assemblage: ‘transit for all’ and the transformation of Melbourne's passenger rail system

References

• Alford, G., and N. Wild. 2007. “Developing a Strategic Approach for Modal Interchange Upgrade Program.” Papers of the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Melbourne: ATRF.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., D. Madden, and D. Wachsmuth. 2011. “Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 15 (2): 225–240. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568717
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, R. 2015. “Linking Urban Research with Planning Practice.” Urban Policy and Research 33 (3): 362–369. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2015.1034854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calimente, J. 2012. “Rail Integrated Communities in Tokyo.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 5 (1): 19–32. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i1.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., M. Tait, and C. Watkins. 2014. “Is There Space for Better Planning in a Neoliberal World? Implications for Planning Practice and Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (1): 45–59. doi: 10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 1998. The Transit Metropolis – A Global Enquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, S., K. Burns, and A. De Bono. 2008. “Can the Design of Effective Public Space Inform the Passenger Experience of Public Transport?” Proceedings, 31st Australasian Transport Research Forum, Gold Coast. http://www.atrf.info/papers/2008/2008_Coxon_Burns_DeBono.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., and N. Low. 2012. Institutional Barriers to Sustainable Transport. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., J. Renne, and L. Bertolini, eds. 2009. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., J. Scheurer, and M. Burke. 2013. “Using New Accessibility Tools to Guide Policy Innovation.” Built Environment 39 (4): 454–472.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. “Introduction: Rhizome.” In A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi, 3–28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2007. “‘I Mean to be Critical, But … ’.” In Critical Architecture, edited by J. Rendell, J. Hill, M. Fraser, and M. Dorrian, 252–260. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and S. Wood. 2015. “Public/Private Urban Interfaces: Type, Adaptation, Assemblage.” Journal of Urbanism 8 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and I. Woodcock. 2014. “Intensifying Melbourne: Transit-Oriented Urban Design for Resilient Urban Futures.” Report on the Australian Research Council Linkage Project 100200590. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Farías, I., and T. Bender. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., J. Sallis, T. Sugiyama, L. Frank, M. Lowe, and N. Owen. 2015. “Translating Active Living Research Into Policy and Practice: One Important Pathway to Chronic Disease Prevention.” Journal of Public Health Policy 36 (2): 231–243. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green, C., and P. Hall. 2009. Better Rail Stations. Department of Transport UK. assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/better-rail-stations/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. 2013. “History and Prospects of the Rail Station.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Sustainability 6 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/17549175.2013.765905.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C., and M. Miller. 2013. “Amenity and Opportunity at Rail Stations.” Australian Planner 50 (1): 44–54. doi:10.1080/07293682.2012.703679.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndmills: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. 2013. “Design Research: the First 500 Years.” In Design Research in Architecture, edited by M. Fraser, 15–34. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. 2011. “Citizens’ Engagement in Policymaking and the Design of Public Services.” Research Paper No. 1 2011-12. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. P. 2003. “The Australian National Railway Level Crossing Safety Strategy.” Papers of the 26th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Wellington: ATRF.
   Google Scholar
• King, S., M. Conley, B. Latimer, and D. Ferrari. 1989. Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Kuranami, C., B. Winston, K. Kimura, C. Rose, and Y. Nakagawa. 2000. The World Bank Study on Urban Transport Development Final Report. Tokyo: Padeco.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lil, C., and T. Kane. 2012. “A Case Study for Engagement with Passionate Groups: Rail Crossings on the Caulfield Dandenong Line.” Papers of the 35th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Perth: ATRF.
   Google Scholar
• Low, N. ed. 2013. Transforming Urban Transport: The Ethics, Politics and Practices of Sustainable Mobility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, R., and P. Skinner. 2011. “An Architect's View of the Station User Experience.” Proceedings, 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum. http://www.atrf.info/papers/2011/2011_Maher_Skinner.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1991. “A Global Sense of Place.” Marxism Today 38: 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011a. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4): 649–671. doi: 10.1068/d4710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011b. “Assemblage and Critical Urbanism.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 15 (2): 204–224. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, C., and M. Daff. 2005. “Pedestrian Behaviour and the Design of Accessible Rail Crossings.” Papers of the 28th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Sydney: ATRF.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, P. 2010. Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age. Abingdon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, P. and J. Dodson. 2011. “Public Transport Network Planning in Australia: Assessing Current Practice in Australia's Five Largest Cities.” Research Paper 34. Urban Research Program, Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, P., and L. Groenhart. 2012. Transport Policy at the Crossroads: Travel to Work in Australian Capital Cities 1976–2011. Melbourne: RMUT University, Global Urban and Social Studies. http://mams.rmit.edu.au/ov14prh13lps1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., T. Beatley, and H. Boyer. 2009. Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1998. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, G., J. Nelson, C. Mulley, G. Tegner, G. Lind, and T. Lange. 2005. Public Transport – Planning the Networks – HiTrans Best Practice Guide 2. Stavanger: European Union Interreg III and HiTranS.
   Google Scholar
• PTV. 2012. Network Development Plan – Metropolitan Rail. http://ptv.vic.gov.au/about-ptv/ptv-data-and-reports/network-development-plan-metropolitan-rail/.
   Google Scholar
• Rail Futures. 2015. Trams and Light Rail in Melbourne's Transport Future. Carlton, VIC: Rail Futures Inc. http://railfutures.org.au/files/TramsLightRailMelbourne.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. 1990. Participatory Design: Theory and Techniques. Raleigh, NC: Henry Sanoff.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, M., and H. Dienel. 2009. Public Transport and Its Users. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J., and P. Mees. 2010. “Planning Public Transport Networks in the Post-Petroleum Era.” Australian Planner 47 (4): 263–271. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2010.526550
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E., and J. Hurley. 2015. “‘Not a Lot of People Read The Stuff’: Australian Urban Research in Planning Practice.” Urban Policy and Research (ahead of print): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2014.994741
   Google Scholar
• Transport for London. 2009. “ Interchange Best Practice Guidelines – Quick Reference Guide.” http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/interchange/documents/interchange-best-practice-guide-qrg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, P. 2013. “Australian Urban Research and Planning.” Urban Policy and Research 31 (2): 134–149. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2013.793260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UITP. 2007. A Low Carbon Future With Public Transport: A UITP Position Paper. Brussels: International Association for Public Transport. http://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers-files/01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• VRIOGS. 2011. VRIOGS 002.1 Railway Station Design Standard and Guidelines, Revision A. Melbourne: Victorian Rail Industry Operators Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wates, N. 1987. Community Architecture: How People Are Creating Their Own Environment. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, I. 2015. “Designing Transit For All: Studios as a Mode of Action Research Within Industry–University Collaborations.” In Studio Futures: Changing Trajectories in Architectural Education, edited by D. Bates, V. Mitsogianni, and D. Ramirez-Lovering, 45–49. Melbourne: URO Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, I., and J. Stone. 2015. “Grade Separations and Improving Intermodal Transfer at Railway Stations in Melbourne.” Proceedings of the 37th Australasian Transport Research Forum. Sydney: ATRF. ATRF2015_Resubmission_143.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, I., and S. Wollan. 2013. “Public Use Zone: A New Paradigm for Suburban Rail Station Design for Australian Cities.” In State of Australian Cities Conference 2013: Refereed Proceedings, edited by C. Ruming, B. Randolph, and N. Gurran. State of Australian Cities Research Network. http://www.soacconference.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Wollan-Structure.pdf.
   Google Scholar