Dancing with the devil: formative peer assessment and academic performance

References

• Assessment Reform Group . 2002 . Assessment for learning: 10 principles , Retrieved January 5, 2012, from www.assessment-reform-group.org
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne , R. , Hughes , K. and Mylonas , A. 2002 . Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 ( 5 ) : 427 – 441 . doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302 (doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302)
   Google Scholar
• Bloom , B. S. 1956 . Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals , 1 , New York : David McKay .
   Google Scholar
• Buckles , S. and Siegfried , J. J. 2006 . Using multiple-choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics . Journal of Economic Education , 37 ( 1 ) : 48 – 57 . (doi:10.3200/JECE.37.1.48-57)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson , T. , MacDonald , D. , Gorely , T. , Hanrahan , S. and Burgess-Limerick , R. 2000 . Implementing criterion-referenced assessment within a multi-disciplinary university department . Higher Education Research & Development , 19 ( 1 ) : 103 – 116 . doi:10.1080/07294360050020507 (doi:10.1080/07294360050020507)
   Google Scholar
• Chan , N. and Kennedy , P. E. 2002 . Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and ‘equivalent’ constructed-response exam questions . Southern Economic Journal , 68 ( 4 ) : 957 (doi:10.2307/1061503)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering , A. W. and Gamson , Z. F. 1987 . Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education . American Association for Higher Education Bulletin , 39 ( 7 ) : 3 – 7 .
   Google Scholar
• George-Walker , L. D. and Keeffe , M. 2010 . Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design . Higher Education Research & Development , 29 ( 1 ) : 1 – 13 . doi:10.1080/07294360903277380 (doi:10.1080/07294360903277380)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen , S. , Dochy , F. and Onghena , P. 2011 . An inventory of peer assessment diversity . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 36 ( 2 ) : 137 – 155 . doi:10.1080/02602930903221444 (doi:10.1080/02602930903221444)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan , S. J. and Isaacs , G. 2001 . Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views . Higher Education Research & Development , 20 ( 1 ) : 53 – 70 . doi:10.1080/07924360120043658 (doi:10.1080/07294360123776)
   Google Scholar
• Lee , O. 2005 . Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda . Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk , 10 ( 4 ) : 433 – 440 . (doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1004_5)
   Google Scholar
• Liu , N.-F. and Carless , D. 2006 . Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 ( 3 ) : 279 – 290 . doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 (doi:10.1080/13562510600680582)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton , M. 2008 . Evidence, argument and social responsibility: First-year students' experiences of information literacy when researching an essay . Higher Education Research & Development , 27 ( 4 ) : 399 – 414 . doi:10.1080/07294360802406858 (doi:10.1080/07294360802406858)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , R. , Bradburry , J. and Acutt , K. 2001 . Academic performance of English first and second-language students: A retrospective appraisal . South African Journal of Higher Education , 15 ( 1 ) : 147 – 153 . (doi:10.4314/sajhe.v15i1.25390)
   Google Scholar
• Pope , N. 2001 . An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 ( 3 ) : 235 – 246 . doi:10.1080/02602930120052396 (doi:10.1080/02602930120052396)
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett , N. 1999 . “ Effective question design ” . In Computer-assisted assessment in higher education , Edited by: Brown , S. , Bull , J. and Race , P. 29 – 38 . London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Race , P. 2001 . A briefing on self, peer and group assessment , Retrieved March 23, 2009, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/SNAS/snas_901
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, G., & Cridland, C. (2009, February 5–6). Rewriting the first year biology essay: Addressing student diversity through a dialogic approach to assessment practice. First Year Experience Curriculum Design Symposium, 2009, QUT, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart , J. and Joy , M. 2008 . Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 24 ( 3 ) : 217 – 231 . doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00255.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00255.x)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , L. C. 2009 . An analysis of the impact of pedagogic interventions in first-year academic development and mainstream courses in microeconomics . South African Journal of Economics , 77 ( 1 ) : 162 – 178 . doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2009.01195.x (doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2009.01195.x)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth , K. 2004 . The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 3 ) : 369 – 378 . doi:Article (doi:10.1080/0260293042000197609)
   Google Scholar
• Snowball , J. D. and Sayigh , E. 2007 . Using the tutorial system to improve the quality of feedback to students in large class teaching . South African Journal of Higher Education , 21 ( 2 ) : 321 – 333 . (doi:10.4314/sajhe.v21i2.25639)
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos , J.-W. , Narciss , S. and Dünnebier , K. 2010 . Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? . Learning and Instruction , 20 ( 4 ) : 291 – 303 . doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 (doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K. J. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 ( 3 ) : 249 – 276 . doi:10.3102/00346543068003249 (doi:10.3102/00346543068003249)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K. J. 2010 . Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment . Learning and Instruction , 20 ( 4 ) : 339 – 343 . doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003 (doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman , P. 2009 . Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 ( 2 ) : 221 (doi:10.1080/02602930801955986)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg , I. , Admiraal , W. and Pilot , A. 2006 . Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education . Studies in Higher Education , 31 ( 3 ) : 341 – 356 . doi:10.1080/03075070600680836 (doi:10.1080/03075070600680836)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert , M. , Sluijsmans , D. and van Merriënboer , J. 2010 . Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions . Learning and Instruction , 20 ( 4 ) : 270 – 279 . doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 (doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar