Enhanced student learning in accounting utilising web-based technology, peer-review feedback and reflective practices: a learning community approach to assessment

References

• Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 34(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1080/03004270600898893
   Google Scholar
• Bain, J.D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N.C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J.B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Brew, C., Riley, P., & Walta, C. (2009). Participative assessment practices: A comparison of pre-service primary teachers and teaching staff views. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 641–657. doi: 10.1080/02602930802468567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. (2001). I know a 2:1 when I see it: Understanding criteria for degree classification in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 301–313. doi: 10.1080/03098770126527
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D.A., & Spence, J. (1991). An experiment in assessment for a large class. In R. Smith (Ed.), Innovations in engineering education (pp. 97–101). London: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2002). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Retrieved November 30, 2010, from www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/1_ocsld/lunchtime_gibbs.html
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, I.E. (1995). Peer assessment. Capability, 1(3), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Huijser, H., Kimmins, L., & Evans, P. (2008). Peer-Assisted learning in fleximode: Developing an online learning community. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning, 1(1), 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky, R.K. & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, L., & Webster, F. (1998). Maintaining standards in higher education? A case study. In: D. Jary & M. Parker (Eds.), The new higher education: Issues and directions for the post-Dearing university (pp. 105–113). Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, W., James, M., & The Assessment Reform Group. (2009). Assessment in schools: Fit for purpose? A commentary by the teaching and learning research programme. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, R.A., Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Pearce, J. (2014). How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study. Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 657–677. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.860421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R.A., & Pearce, J.M. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth07/procs/filename
   Google Scholar
• O'Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2010). Learning our lesson: Review of quality teaching in higher education. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 309–323. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000001337
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J., Mulder, R., & Baik, C. (2010). Involving students in peer review: Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching. University of Melbourne, Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J., Ryan, M., & Taylor, S. (2012). Utilising E-Technology, peer review feedback and reflective practices to reposition students as responsible partners in their own learning within a mass education context. ICTED 2012 proceedings CD, International association of technology, education and development (IATED) (pp. 5831–5841). Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2013). Making a case for peer review/feedback and assessment. Workshop presentation at Oxford Brookes University, assessment standards knowledge exchange, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Race, P. (2003). Why fix assessment? In L. Cooke & P. Smith (Eds.), Seminar: Reflections on learning and teaching in higher education. Buckinghamshire: Chilterns University College.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. (2009). Engaging students with assessment and feedback. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., O'Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063819
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164. doi: 10.1080/02602930301671
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (2010). Improving reflective writing in higher education: A social semiotic perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 99–111. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2012a). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.661704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2012b). Developing a systematic, cross-faculty approach to teaching and assessing reflection in higher education (Final Report for the Australian Learning and Teaching Council). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. doi: 10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M.N., & Davis, S. (1998). The use of assessment criteria to ensure consistency of marking: Some implications for good practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(3), 162–171. doi: 10.1108/09684889810220465
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2011a, July 4–7). Transferring knowledge through peer-reviewed assessment: The creation of a community of practice and the threats to its Survival. HERDSA 2011 conference: Higher education on the edge. Gold Coast, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2011b). Helping undergraduate students across disciplines and cultures actively engage and collaborate as equal members of a community of scholars: Peer review within an E-Learning environment. ICERI 2011 proceedings CD, International association of technology, education and development (IATED) (pp. 2609–2619). Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2009). ‘Peer assessment’. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K., & Gardner, K. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
   Google Scholar