Factors influencing students’ perceptions of graduate attribute acquisition in a multidisciplinary honours track in a Dutch university

References

• Barrie, S.C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S.C. (2012). A research-based approach to generic attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 79–92. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.642842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.642839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K.M., & Cooper, J. (2002). A persuasive example of collaborative learning. Teaching of Psychology, 29(2), 132–135. doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2902_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student-identity development in higher education: Implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56(1), 65–76. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.874157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.697878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2014). The differential impact of observational learning and practice-based learning on the development of oral presentation skills in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 256–271. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.832155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493–510. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.629361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Inspectorate. (2013). The state of education in the Netherlands. Highlights of the 2011/2012 Education Report. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/binaries/content/assets/Actueel_publicaties/2013/the-state-of-education-in-the-netherlands-2011–2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2012). The European higher education area in 2012: Bologna process implementation report. European Commission. Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J.J. (1994). Teaching and learning: New models. Annual Review of Psychology, 45(1), 171–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.001131
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cepero, M.C. (2008). The enrichment triad model: Nurturing creative-productivity among college students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 295–302. doi: 10.1080/14703290802176238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Choi, B. (2011). Student-identified exemplary teachers: Insights from talented teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 111–125. doi: 10.1177/0016986210397830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A.A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A.E., & Gottfried, A.W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(2), 121–132. doi: 10.1177/001698620404800205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Barrie, S. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 325–334. doi: 10.1080/02602930903221485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, E., van der Meer, J., & Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. (2013). Validation and use of the CEQ in the Netherlands. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(4), 330–343. doi: 10.1108/QAE-11-2012-0041
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, E.P.W.A. (2004). The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education. Higher Education, 47(4), 411–435. doi: 10.1023/B:HIGH.0000020868.39084.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2013). There is nothing generic about graduate attributes: Unpacking the scope of context. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(5), 591–605. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.645466
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kanthan, R., & Mills, S. (2007). Cooperative learning in the first year of undergraduate medical education. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 5(5), 136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2004). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from http://nsse.indiana.edu/2004_annual_report/pdf/2004_Conceptual_Framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Long, A. (2012). Editor's introduction. Journal of the National Collegiate Honours Council, 13(2), 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, R., & Palmer, B. (2004). Encouraging intellectual growth: Senior college student profiles. Journal of Adult Development, 11(2), 111–122. doi: 10.1023/B:JADE.0000024544.50818.1f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, H.P., Sciluna, H.A., Boyle, P., Grimm, M.C., Gibson, K.A., & Jones, P.D. (2012). Successful development of generic capabilities in an undergraduate medical education program. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 525–539. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.559194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, S.A. (1997). Increasing student participation and productivity in small-group activities for psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 24(2), 105–115. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2402_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moalosi, R., Molokwane, S., & Mothibedi, G. (2012). Using a design-oriented project to attain graduate attributes. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(1), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. Glasgow: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P.M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N.W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435–1447. doi: 10.1177/0146167207305536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150. doi: 10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and the talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J.S. (2000). The identification and development of giftedness as a paradigm for school reform. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(2), 95–114. doi: 10.1023/A:1009429218821
   Google Scholar
• Scager, K., Akkerman, S.A., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Challenging high-ability students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 659–679. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.743117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, C., & Burke, G. (1999). An undergraduate student flow model: Australian higher education. Higher Education, 37(4), 359–375. doi: 10.1023/A:1003765222250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Bath, D. (2006). The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. Higher Education, 51(2), 259–286. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6389-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steur, J.M., Jansen, E.P.W.A., & Hofman, W.H.A. (2012). Graduateness: An empirical examination of the formative function of university education. Higher Education, 64(6), 861–874. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9533-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman, M., & Hartley, J. (1996). A comparison between the time-management skills and academic performance of mature and traditional-entry students. Higher Education, 32(2), 199–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00138396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijl, P.J., Wolfensberger, M.V.C., van Tilborgh, P.J., & Pilot, A. (2005). Honours programma's in Nederland. Resultaten van een landelijke inventarisatie in 2004 [Honours programmes in the Netherlands: Results of a nationwide survey in 2004]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 174–183). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Quek, C., & Feng, A.X. (2007). The development and use of a structured teacher observation scale to assess differentiated best practice (classroom observation scale-revised). Roeper Review, 29(2), 84–93. doi: 10.1080/02783190709554391
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar