465
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bridging the gap: the challenges of employing entrepreneurial processes within university settings

&
Pages 1068-1082 | Received 19 Mar 2015, Accepted 25 Sep 2015, Published online: 16 Feb 2016

References

  • Abreu, M., & Grinevic, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
  • Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
  • Anderson, G. (2006). Carving out time and space in the managerial university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 578–592. doi: 10.1108/09534810610686698
  • Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375. doi: 10.2307/2391848
  • Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2012). Impact of research. A guide for business schools – insights from the AACSB international impact of research exploratory study. Retrieved March 19, 2015, from http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Publications/research-reports/impact-of-research-exploratory-study.ashx
  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneur: Organizational change at the individual level. Organizational Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0295
  • Bexley, E. (2014). Fee deregulation: What does it mean for Australian higher education? The Conversation. Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://theconversation.com/fee-deregulation-what-does-it-mean-for-australian-higher-education-26496
  • Bilimoria, D., Godwin, L., & Zelechowski, D. (2007). Influence and inclusion: A framework for researching women's advancement in organizations. In D. Bilimoria & S.K. Piderit (Eds.), Handbook on women in business and management (pp. 232–253). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C.B. (2012). Academic motivation: Exploring prestige economies. In Practice, 28, 1–4.
  • Blatt, R. (2009). Tough love: How communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 533–551. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2009.40633298
  • Bridgman, T. (2007). Freedom and autonomy in the university enterprise. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(4), 478–490. doi: 10.1108/09534810710760036
  • Carr, K. (2011). Creating links between researchers and industry (Innovation Department of Industry, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, Ed.). Canberra: Australian Government.
  • Christopher, J. (2012). Tension between the corporate and collegial cultures of Australian public universities: The current status. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(7–8), 556–571. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.06.001
  • Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2010). Across the great divide: What do Australian academics think of university leadership? Advice from the CAP survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 379–387. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2010.491111
  • Dearlove, J. (2002). A continuing role for academics: The governance of UK universities in the post-Dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 257–275. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00217
  • De Carolis, D., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x
  • Deem, R. (1998). New managerialism and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1080/0962021980020014
  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20. doi: 10.1080/03050060020020408
  • D'Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(2007), 1295–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
  • D'Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
  • Diefenbach, F. (2011). Entrepreneurship in the public sector. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
  • Edmondson, G., Valigra, L., Kenward, M., Hudson, R., & Belfield, H. (2012). Making industry-university partnerships work: Lessons from successful collaborations. Science Business Innovation Board AISBL.
  • Educators, MPs furious over university funding cuts. (2013). ABC News. Retrieved February 15, 2014, from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-14/educators-mps-furious-over-university-funding-cuts/4627652
  • Fredman, N., & Doughney, J. (2012). Academic dissatisfaction, managerial change and neo-liberalism. Higher Education, 64(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9479-y
  • Frey, B. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. The Economic Journal, 107(443), 1043–1053. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00006.x
  • Frey, B., Hattke, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013, June). Organizational control systems in the public sector and in research governance. Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of the European Academy of Management, Istanbul.
  • Goxe, F., & Viala, C. (2010, June 24–27). Social capital as a catalyst: Enabling effect on organisational levers for corporate entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the ICSB world conference, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Harman, K., & Treadgold, E. (2007). Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 13–29. doi: 10.1080/07294360601166786
  • Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2012). Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy, 41(2), 262–275. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010
  • Hil, R. (2012). Whackademia: An insider's account of the troubled university. Sydney: New South Publishing.
  • Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
  • Ireland, R.D., Kuratko, D.F., & Morris, M.H. (2006). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: Innovation at all levels: Part 1. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(1), 623–632.
  • Kenny, J.D. (2009). Managing a modern university: Is it time for a rethink? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(6), 629–642. doi: 10.1080/07294360903206934
  • Lawson, B., Tyler, B., & Cousins, P. (2006, August). Social capital effects on relational performance improvement: An information processing perspective. Paper presented at Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
  • Lee, R. (2008). Social capital and business and management: Setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 247–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00244.x
  • Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology and non-technology based nascent entrepreneurs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 149–170. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00009-9
  • Luthans, K., & Leung, A. (2010). Development of human and social capital through industry peer networks. Business Research Yearbook Global Business Perspectives, 17(2), 685–690.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Moran, P. (2005). Structural versus relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151. doi: 10.1002/smj.486
  • Morris, M., & Jones, F. (1999). Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91.
  • Musselin, C. (2013). Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university. Higher Education, 65(1), 25–37. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9579-3
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
  • Osterloh, M., Frey, B., & Frost, J. (2001). Managing motivation, organization and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3–4), 231–239. doi: 10.1023/A:1014084019816
  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Ested, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  • Pick, D., Teo, S., & Yeung, M. (2012). Friend or foe? New managerialism and technical, administrative and clerical support staff in Australian universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00500.x
  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Managing the effective university. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 347–370. doi: 10.1080/0729436980170307
  • Sadler, R. (2000). Corporate entrepreneurship in the public sector: The dance of the chameleon. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 25–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00149
  • Saunders, M. (2006). The madness and malady of managerialism. Quadrant, 50(3), 9–17.
  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  • Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (1996). Renegade and rational championing strategies. Organization Studies, 17(5), 751–771. doi: 10.1177/017084069601700503
  • Sharrock, G. (2007). After Copernicus: Beyond the crisis in Australian universities. Australian Universities Review, 49(1–2), 2–14.
  • Sharrock, G. (2012). Four management agendas for Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(3), 323–337. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2012.678728
  • Szekeres, J. (2007). General staff experiences in the corporate university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 133–145. doi: 10.1080/13600800600750962
  • Triechmann, J.S., Dennis, A.R., Northcraft, G.B., & Nieme Jr, A.W. (2000). Serving constituencies in business schools: MBA program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1130–1141. doi: 10.2307/1556341
  • Tsai, W., & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. doi: 10.2307/257085
  • Voronov, M., Wolfram Cox, J., Le Trent-Jones, T., & Weir, D. (2009). Introduction: Intersection of critical management research and practice: A multi-domain perspective. In M. Voronov, J. Wolfram Cox, T. Le Trent-Jones, & D. Weir (Eds.), Critical management studies at work: Negotiating the tensions between theory and practice (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Wardale, D., & Lord, L. (2012, December 5). Finding funding for executive education and research: Ten key principles. 26th annual Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management conference (ANZAM), Perth, Australia, ANZAM.
  • Wardale, D., & Lord, L. (2013, June). Caught in the crossfire. In the European Academy of Management (EURAM) conference 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Washington, M.L. (2008). It's whom you know and what you know: A social capital perspective of the effect of small firm organisational learning on firm performance. Proquest.
  • Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2009). Pay for performance in the public sector – Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mup009
  • White, K., Carvalho, T., & Riordan, S. (2011). Gender, power and managerialism in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 179–188. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.559631
  • Wilken, P.H. (1979). Entrepreneurship: A comparative and historical study. Norwood: Ablex.
  • Wright, M., Simon Mosey, S., & Noke, H. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: Rethinking the role of the entrepreneur. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(5–6), 429–444. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2012.656528
  • Zahra, S.A. (2010). Harvesting family firms' organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 345–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00894.x
  • Zimmerman, J.L. (2001). Can American business schools survive? Social Science Research Network. Available at SSRN. Retrieved January 14, 2014, from http://ssrn.com/abstract = 283112 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.283112

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.