A collaborative autoethnography study to inform the teaching of reflective practice in STEM

References

• Ackoff, R.L. (1962). Scientific method: Optimizing applied research decisions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlberg, M. (2003). High quality learning. Retrieved November 15, 2012, from http://savonlinnakampus.joensu.fi/ahlberg/sivut/High_qualiity_learning.htm
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449 doi: 10.1177/0891241605280449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, S.L., & Clayton, P.H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29(2), 137–154. doi: 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000048795.84634.4a
   Google Scholar
• Bain, J.D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N.C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.
   Google Scholar
• Borton, T. (1970). Reach, touch, and teach. New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. In L.M. English & M.A. Gillen (Eds.), Promoting journal writing in adult education (pp. 9–18). New directions in adult and continuing education no. 99. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, S.M., & Ritter, J.K. (2011). Exploring the transition into academia through collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 7(2), 171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, R.D., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2011). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 247–272. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000304582
   Google Scholar
• Dinkelman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education a means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 6–18. doi: 10.1177/0022487102238654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. (2008, October). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Paper presented at the National Research Council’s Workshop linking evidence to promising practices in STEM undergraduate education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., & Bullock, S.M. (2014). Reframing pedagogy while teaching about teaching online: A collaborative self-study. Professional Development in Education. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.938357
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hains-Wesson, R., & Tytler, R. (2015). A perspective on supporting STEM academics with blended learning at an Australian university. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 460–479. Retrieved June 7, 2016, from http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/hains-wesson.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M.L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17–28. doi: 10.1080/17425960801976321
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. doi: 10.1002/tea.20439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., Johnson, S., & Harrison, G. (2011). The supply of and demand for high-level STEM skills: Briefing paper. London: Commission for Employment and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2007). Research methods in education (No. 10). Innovation way, York Science Park. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V.K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. LaBoskey, & T.L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lassonde, C.A., Galman, S., & Kosnik, C. (Eds.). (2009). Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Mellors-Bourne, R., Connor, H., & Jackson, C. (2011). STEM graduates in non STEM jobs. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Merga, M. (2015). Thesis by publication in education: An autoethnographic perspective for educational researchers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 291–308. Retrieved June 7, 2016, from http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/merga.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on recognizing, evaluating, rewarding, and developing excellence in teaching of undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. In M.A. Fox & N. Hackerman (Eds.), Center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education (p. 2). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. (2015). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A.L., Roessner, J.D., Oliver, S., & Johnson, D. (2006). A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 244–257. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.661704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Yeong, F.M. (2014). Science students and the social sciences: Strange bedfellows? Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 1078–1080. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.915466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K., James, K., & Noy, S. (2016). Evaluating a reflective practice rubric. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(2), 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar