Pedagogic practices to support international students in seminar discussions

References

• Aguilar, M. (2016). Seminars. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 335–347). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas, E. (2009). How teachers’ attitudes affect their approaches to teaching international students. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(6), 615–628. doi: 10.1080/07294360903208096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkoudis, S. (2007). Teaching international students: Strategies to enhance learning. Retrieved October 1 2017, from https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1761507/international.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Başturkmen (2016). Dialogic interaction. In K. Hyland and P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 152–164). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from http://content.yudu.com/Library/A2xnp5/Bera/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http://free.yudu.com/item/details/2023387/Bera
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1997). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. (2009). Spatial deixis – the use of spatial co-ordinates in spoken language. Working Papers in Linguistics, 38, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, K., Chen, H., & Warren, S. (2012). Increasing international and domestic student interaction through group work: A case study from the humanities. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 797–810. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.669748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Demissie, F. (2012). Investigating students’ perspectives of learning and participating in seminars using a Bourdieuian perspective. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 1(1), 1–9. doi: 10.7190/seej.v1i1.32
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349–367. doi: 10.1007/s11133-010-9157-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, C., & Nakane, I. (2009). Privileging of speech in EAP and mainstream university classrooms: A critical evaluation of participation. Tesol Quarterly, 43(2), 203–230. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00165.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinan, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engin, M. (2015). Written artefacts in post-conference feedback sessions: The running commentary as a support for teacher learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(3), 254–266. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2015.1041289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engin, M. (2017). Contributions and silence in academic talk: Exploring learner experiences of dialogic interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejes, A., Johansson, K., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2005). Learning to play the seminar game: Students’ initial encounters with a basic working form in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 29–41. doi: 10.1080/1356251052000305516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gbadamosi, G. (2015). Should we bother improving students’ attendance at seminars? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(2), 196–206. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.796717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. B., Bailey Murphy, K., & Lindquist D’Andrea, M. (2014). Discussion dilemmas: An analysis of beliefs and ideals in the undergraduate seminar. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.731529
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, S. (2004). Action research and transformative learning in teaching development. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 259–272. doi: 10.1080/09650790400200248
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, S., & Petersen, N. (2002). Structuring dialogue with students via learning tasks. Innovative Higher Education, 26(4), 281–291. doi: 10.1023/A:1015833114292
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20, 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2008). Learning an additional language through dialogic inquiry. Language and Education, 22(2), 114–136. doi: 10.2167/le730.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennebry, M., Lo, Y. Y., & Macaro, E. (2012). Differing perspectives of non-native speaker students’ linguistic experiences on higher degree courses. Oxford Review of Education, 38(2), 209–230. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2011.651312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Katic, E., Nagarajan, A., & Chernobilsky, E. (2007). Soft leaders, hard artifacts, and the groups we rarely see: Using video to understand peer learning processes. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 255–270). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• IELTS. (2017). IELTS. Retrieved from https://www.ielts.org/
   Google Scholar
• Katić, E. K., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Weber, K. H. (2009). Material mediation: Tools and representations supporting collaborative problem-solving discourse. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., & Mercer, N. (2015). The role of exploratory talk in classroom search engine tasks. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 303–319. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.931884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79–96. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800015329
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 142–156. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2009.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luff, P., Heath, C. & Greatbatch, D. (1992, December). Tasks-in-interaction: Paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 163–170). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, L. (2012). Does every student have a voice? Critical action research on equitable classroom participation practices. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 417–434. doi: 10.1177/1362168812436922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168. doi: 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. doi: 10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., Hall, M. W., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Accountable talk sourcebook: For classroom conversation that works. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Institute for Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, M., & Sharpe, T. (2005). Collective instructional scaffolding in English as a second language classrooms. Prospect, 20(1), 31–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nakane, I. (2006). Silence and politeness in intercultural communication in university seminars. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1811–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, A., & Walsh, S. (2012). Applying corpus linguistics and conversation analysis in the investigation of small group teaching in higher education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 159–181. doi: 10.1515/cllt-2012-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation. Discourse and document analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Remedios, L., Clarke, D., & Hawthorne, L. (2008). The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 201–216. doi: 10.1177/1469787408095846
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, D. (2004). Puzzling experiences in higher education: Critical moments for conversation. Studies in Higher Education, 29(1), 91–107. doi: 10.1080/1234567032000164895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J., & Viete, R. (2009). Respectful interactions: Learning with international students in the English-speaking academy. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 303–314. doi: 10.1080/13562510902898866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville-Troike, M. (2015). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller, P. (2005). Teaching as a focussed conversation: The use of incentive-based preparation exercises. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 305–312. doi: 10.1080/14703290500291867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language and Education, 14(3), 184–203. doi: 10.1080/09500780008666789
   Google Scholar
• Tin, T. B. (2003). Does talking with peers help learning? The role of expertise and talk in convergent group discussion tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00033-4
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 46–65. doi: 10.2167/illt42.0
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S., Morton, T., & O’Keeffe, A. (2011). Analysing university spoken interaction: A CL/CA approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 325–345. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.16.3.03wal
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Intersubjectivity and alterity in human communication. In N. Budwig, I. C. Uzgiris, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 17–32). Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar