Toward theories of partnership praxis: an analysis of interpretive framing in literature on students as partners in teaching and learning

References

• Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2007). Self-authorship: The foundation for twenty-first-century education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(109), 69–83. doi: 10.1002/tl.266
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Carson, L., & Piggott, L. (2013). Deliberative democracy for curriculum renewal. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 499–508). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphor: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula – a new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving learning through research and scholarship: 20 years of ISL (pp. 96–108). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2017). A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways? International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–5. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2016). Cultivating student-staff partnerships through research and practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2016.1124965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brooman, S., Darwent, S., & Pimor, A. (2015). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663–674. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.910128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding and developing student engagement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., Furlonger, R., & Rinaldo-Langridge, F. (2016). A critical consideration of, and research agenda for, the approach of ‘students as partners’. Proceedings of 40th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, July 15–17, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.iutconference.com/2016/01/a-critical-consideration-of-and-researchagenda-for-the-approach-of-students-as-partners/
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘Student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2013). Catalyzing multiple forms of engagement through student-faculty partnerships exploring teaching and learning. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 549–565). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2014a). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2014b). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31–46. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2018). What our uses of theory tell us about how we conceptualize student-staff partnership. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(1), 101–105. Retrieved from https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/raise/article/view/Bryson/646
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (in press). Tracing the evolution of student voice in educational research. In R. Bourke & J. Loveridge (Eds.), Radical collegiality’ through student voice (pp. 17–38). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Abbot, S. (2016). Translating partnerships: How faculty-student collaboration in explorations of teaching and learning can transform perceptions, terms, and selves. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–14. doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Alter, Z. (2011). What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Ethics of academic leadership: Guiding learning and teaching. In F. Su & M. Wood (Eds.), Cosmopolitan perspectives on academic leadership in higher education (pp. 175–191). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student–faculty partnership. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1097–1109. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.911263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2012). Rethinking the student/teacher nexus: Students as consultants on teaching in higher education. In M. Neary, L. Bell, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Towards teaching in public: Reshaping the modern university (pp. 52–67). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1993). The new economics for industry, government, education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Centre for Advanced Engineering Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P. (2013). Introduction: Crossing thresholds together. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 9. Retrieved from http://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=tlthe
   Google Scholar
• Frison, D., & Melacarne, C. (2017). Introduction – Students-faculty partnership in Italy: Approaches, practices, and perspectives. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 20. Retrieved from http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss20/1/
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S., Baskerville, D., Berry, A., Black, A., Norris, K., & Symeonidou, S. (2017). Including students as co-enquirers: Matters of identity, agency, language and labelling in an international participatory research study. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2000). In search of metaphor. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 393–405. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Healey, R. (2018). ‘It depends’: Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as ‘partners’ practices’ and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., & Huber, M. T. (2008). Placing theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 229–244. doi: 10.1177/1474022208094409
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271. doi: 10.1177/1077800412471510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., & Bennett, L. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, E., Puri, V., Wan, S., Ahmad, A., Goff, L., Knorr, K., … Woo, J. (2016). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: A case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 4–15. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E. (2016). Students as partners as the future of student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal of Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., Acai, A., Dvorakova, S. L., Felten, P., Marquis, E., & Mercer-Mapstone, L. (2018). An analysis of interpretive framing in literature on students as partners in teaching and learning: Data tables. University of Queensland. Data Collection. doi: 10.14264/uql.2018.519
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hines, L., & Turner, J. (2018). Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Russell, S., & Enright, E. (2018). It is a complicated thing: Leaders’ conceptions of students as partners in the neoliberal university. Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1482268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meacham, M., Castor, M., & Felten, P. (2013). Partners as newcomers: Mixed-role partnerships as Communities of practice. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 10. Retrieved from http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss10/5/
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, L. S., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal of Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–23. doi: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Marquis, E., & McConnell, C. (2018). The ‘partnership identity’ in higher education: Moving from ‘us’ and ‘them’ to ‘we’ in student-staff partnership. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(1), 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Mercer, G. (2018). A dialogue between partnership and feminism: Deconstructing power and exclusion in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(1), 137–143. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2017.1391198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1–9. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
   Google Scholar
• Millard, L., Bartholomew, P., Brand, S., & Nygaard, C. (2013). Why student engagement matters. In C. Nysgaard, S. Brand, P. Bartholomew, & L. Millard (Eds.), Student engagement: Identity, motivation and community (pp. 1–15). Farringdon: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M. (2010). Student as producer: A pedagogy for the avant-garde? Learning Exchange, 1(1). Retrieved from http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/4186/
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M., & Amsley, S. (2012). Occupy: A new pedagogy of space and time? Journal of Critical Education Policy, 10(2), 106–138.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. (2016). The pedagogy of partnership: Six principles for action. Educational Developments, 17(4), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 254–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534–552. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.938264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, D. R. (1975). What is a concept? Educational Technology, 15(7), 36–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, E. (2007). Constructing an effective ‘voice’ in academic discussion writing: An appraisal theory perspective. In A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell, & R. Whittaker (Eds.), Advances in language and education (pp. 166–184). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Bovill, C. (2018). Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 112–128. doi: 10.1177/1474904117704102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., Wilding, D., Mockridge, A., & Lambert, C. (2012). Reinventing engagement. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 259–278). Farringdon: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, A. M. (2012). Undergraduate interns as staff developers: Flowers in the desert. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 7–17. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.647779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 395–411. doi: 10.1080/0729436042000276431
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2012). Wicked issues in situating theory in close-up research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 273–284. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (ed.). (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1995 [1969]). Liminality and communitas. In The ritual process: Structure and antistructure (pp. 94–130). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, J. (2013). Active participation in learning: Students creating their educational experience. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 401–419). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice – A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wenstone, R. (2012). NUS-A Manifesto for partnership. Retrieved from http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resourcehandler/0a02e2e5-197e-4bd3-b7ed-e8ceff3dc0e4/
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., & Otis, M. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., Thibou, S., & Kaufer, B. (2012). Students as co-inquirers: A requisite threshold concept in educational development? The Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 34–38.
   Google Scholar