Let me edutain you! Practices of student engagement employed by new lecturers

References

• Australian Council for Educational Research. (2010). Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and learning. Australian Student Engagement Report. Camberwell: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging in the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K., & Cassidy, S. (2013). Emotional labour in university lecturers: Considerations for higher education institutions. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2, 22–36. doi: 10.5430/jct.v2n2p22
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: D McKay & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44, 349–362. doi: 10.1080/14703290701602748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., & Stoncel, D. (2012). The impact of a postgraduate certification in teaching in higher education on university lecturers appointed for their professional expertise at a teaching-led university: ‘It's made me braver’. International Journal for Academic Development, 17, 149–162. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.620107
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, J. (2007). Alienation and engagement: Exploring students’ experiences of studying engineering. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 119–133. doi: 10.1080/13562510601102354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 121–141. doi: 10.1080/02602930600801878
   Google Scholar
• Comber, D., & Walsh, L. (2008). Enhancing educational development for new academic staff through the inclusion and comparison of disciplinary pedagogies. Final report, Scottish Higher Education Enhancement Research, Phase II.
   Google Scholar
• Darabi, M., Macaskill, A., & Reidy, L. (2017). A qualitative study of the UK academic role: Positive features, negative aspects and associated stressors in a mainly teaching-focused university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41, 566–580. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1159287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, K., Greenfield, R., & Pancini, G. (2017). Conceptualising institutional support for early, mid, and later career teachers. International Journal for Academic Development, 22, 157–169. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2016.1218882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept. State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, M., Whipple, A., St Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8, 99–113. doi: 10.1007/BF03340899
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L. (2015). ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 402–411. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., & Stevenson, J. (2017). Teaching excellence in higher education: Critical perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 391–395. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W., & Myatt, P. (2011). Telling tales: A narrative research study of the experiences of new international academic staff at an Australian university. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 33–44. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.546219
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (eds.). (2009). Student engagement in higher education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2008). Tender for a study into student engagement. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23, 191–201. doi: 10.1080/02671520802048729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. (2016). ‘Teachers’ to ‘academics’: The implementation of a modernisation project at one UK post-92 university. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1189–1202. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.968544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 1005–1018. doi: 10.1002/berj.3121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandlbinder, P., & Peseta, T. (2009). Key concepts in postgraduate certificates in higher education teaching and learning in Australasia and the United Kingdom. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 19–31. doi: 10.1080/13601440802659247
   Google Scholar
• Kettle, M. (2011). Academic practice as explanatory framework: Reconceptualising international student academic engagement and university teaching. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.537067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K. (2005). Serious thoughts about dropping out in first year: Trends, patterns and implications for higher education. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 2, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540–563. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2011). Engaging students in learning: A review of a conceptual organiser. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 193–204. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.509761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 177–185. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnis, C. (2003). New realities of the student experience: How should universities respond? Paper presented at the European Association for Institutional Research 25th Annual Conference, Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 59–76. doi: 10.1076/lpos.3.1.59.27841
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., Seifert, T., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 42, 16–22. doi: 10.1080/00091380903449060
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resources in enhancing student learning and development? Research in Higher Education, 46, 235–249. doi: 10.1007/s11162-004-1601-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, (pp. 51–80). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2007). An overview of research on student support: Helping students to achieve or achieving institutional targets? Nurture or denature? Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 683–695. doi: 10.1080/13562510701596240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 450–467. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R., Huang, R., Poverjuc, O., & Wyness, L. (2016). What role do mentors play in supporting new university lecturers to develop their teaching practices? Professional Development in Education, 42, 647–665. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2015.1065898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). Alienation, agency and authenticity: A synthesis of the literature on student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 311–326. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.725223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research: Thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1311–1323. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2014). Student engagement: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 386–398. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.832160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar