The impact of diversity, prior academic achievement and goal orientation on learning performance in group capstone projects

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264. doi: 10.1177/0273475308322283
   Google Scholar
• Aller, B. M., Lyth, D. M., & Mallak, L. A. (2008). Capstone project team formation: Mingling increases performance and motivation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 503–507. doi:10.1111/j/1540-4609.2008.00190.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00190.x
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(2), 248–267. doi: 10.1177/1052562904263729
   Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J. (2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 175–188. doi: 10.1177/0273475307302019
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37–49. doi: 10.1177/1469787412467123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, S., Abawi, L., Gibbings, P., Jones, H., Redmond, P., & Shams, S. (2018). Developing a generic review framework to assure capstone quality. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 730–743. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1453787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, G. D. (2008). Children’s critical thinking when learning from others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 344–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00603.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koljatic, M., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education. Higher Education, 42(3), 351–371. doi: 10.1023/A:1017993113390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komenda, M., Vita, M., Vaitsis, C., Schwarz, D., Pokorna, A., Zary, N., … Vrana, K. E. (2015). Curriculum mapping with academic analytics in medical and healthcare education. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0143748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., & Loton, D. (2015). Capstones across disciplines: Synthesising theory, practice and policy to provide practical tools for curriculum design. Sydney: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from https://ltr.edu.au/resources/Lee_N_NSTF_report_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lima, R. M., Carvalho, D., Assunção Flores, M., & Van Hattum-Janssen, N. (2007). A case study on project led education in engineering: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 337–347. doi: 10.1080/03043790701278599
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Debus, R. L., & Malmberg, L. (2008). Performance and mastery orientation of high school and university/college students: A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 464–487. doi: 10.1177/0013164407308478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, G., Ochoa, X., & Chiluiza, K. (2014, March). Techniques for data-driven curriculum analysis. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. (pp. 148–157). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2567574.2567591
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students, a third decade of research (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2008). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 47–58. doi: 10.1080/01443410701413746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37–45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571
   Google Scholar
• Pirmohamed, S., Debowska, A., & Boduszek, D. (2017). Gender differences in the correlates of academic achievement among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 313–324. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-03-2016-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 405–419. doi: 10.1348/000709905X43571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., Wong, K., & Li, Y. (2014). The capstone experience: Student and academic perspectives. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 580–594. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.841646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toetenel, L., & Rienties, B. (2016). Analysing 157 learning designs using learning analytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical decision making. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 981–992. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudge, J. R. H. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian analysis. Child Development, 63(6), 1364–1379. doi: 10.2307/1131562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. doi: 10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematical learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389. doi: 10.2307/749186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1993). Collaborative group versus individual assessment in mathematics: Processes and outcomes. Educational Assessment, 1(2), 131–152. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea0102_3
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239–261. doi: 10.3102/01623737017002239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. doi:10.3102/0028312035004607 doi: 10.3102/00028312035004607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar