I don’t need peer support: effective tutoring in blended learning environments for part-time, adult learners

References

• Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications (pp. 35–50). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ausburn, L. J. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International, 41, 327–337. doi: 10.1080/0952398042000314820
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 152–155. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08 doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Nottingham: British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casquero, O., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., Benito, M., & Alberdi, M. (2016). Students’ personal networks in virtual and personal learning environments: A case study in higher education using learning analytics approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 49–67. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.817441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De George-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/07294360903277380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, L., Anderson, T. M., Hammond, C., Jamieson, A., & Woodley, A. (2007). The social and economic benefits of part-time, mature study at Birkbeck College and the Open University. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23–35. doi: 10.1080/03054980125310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Where is the ‘theory’ within the field of educational technology research? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 956–971. doi:10.111/bjet.12770 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54, 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2013). Heutagogy fundamentals. In S. Hase & C. Kenyon (Eds.), Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action (pp. 7–18). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research (pp. 256–271). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 22, 57–70. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000058623
   Google Scholar
• Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning and e-learning: The role of theory. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 13–25). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. L. (2014). Variation in adult learners’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (pp. 215–234). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150. doi: 10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). The attainment and experiences of disabled students in distance education. Distance Education, 30(1), 87–102. doi: 10.1080/01587910902845931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruge, G., Tokede, O., & Tivendale, L. (2019). Implementing constructive alignment in higher education–cross-institutional perspectives from Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 833–848. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1586842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching & learning online (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), Retrieved from https://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Hill, J. (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383–397. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1517732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M., Martin, I., & Endlar, L. (2006). The structuration of blended learning: Putting holistic design principles into practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 163–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & Hammond, C. (2011). The motivations and outcomes of studying for part-time mature students in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(5), 591–612. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2011.579736
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. (2015). Learning with ‘e’s. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Youde, A. (2018). Andragogy in blended learning contexts: Effective tutoring of adult learners studying part-time, vocationally relevant degrees at a distance. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(2), 255–272. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2018.1450303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar