3,118
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Designing for learning in the Yellow House: a comparison of instructional and learning design origins and practices

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 997-1012 | Received 05 Mar 2019, Accepted 27 Oct 2019, Published online: 23 Dec 2019

References

  • Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2018). A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer asssessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 453–467. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913
  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
  • Burkman, E. (1987). Prospects for instructional systems design in the public schools. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(4), 27–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02905308
  • Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2009). The critical, relational practice of instructional design in higher education: An emerging model of change agency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 645–663. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9061-6
  • Conole, G. (2010). Theory and methodology in networked learning. Milton Keynes, UK. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/grainne/theory-and-methodology-in-networked-learning
  • Conole, G. (2016). Theoretical underpinnings of learning design. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online (pp. 42–62). London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Learning-Design-Conceptualizing-a-Framework-for-Teaching-and-Learning/Dalziel/p/book/9781138910973
  • Dalziel, J. (2016). Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online. London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Learning-Design-Conceptualizing-a-Framework-for-Teaching-and-Learning/Dalziel/p/book/9781138910973
  • Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., … Bower, M. (2012). The Larnaca declaration on learning design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(7), 1–24. doi: 10.5334/jime.407/
  • Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., … Bower, M. (2016). The Larnaca declaration on learning design–2013. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online (pp. 1–41). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Schools: Studies in Education, 5(12), 87–95. doi: 10.1086/591813
  • Dick, W. (1987). A history of instructional design and its impact on educational psychology. In J. Glover & R. Roning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology. New York: Plenum.
  • Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Elias, J. L., & Merriam, S. (1980). Philosophical foundations of adult education (1st ed.). Malabar: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
  • Foreman-Peck, L., & Travers, K. (2015). Developing expertise in managing dialogue in the ‘third space’: Lessons from a participatory evaluation. Evaluation, 21(3), 344–358. doi: 10.1177/1356389015592492
  • Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 20th anniversary edition. (M. B. (Translator) Ramos, Ed.) (20th Anniv). New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Gagné, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
  • Goodyear, P. (2001). Effective networked learning in higher education: Notes and guidelines (Deliverable 9). Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Retrieved from http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/docs/Guidelines_final.doc
  • Grant, P. (2016). Reading Vincent Van Gogh. Edmonton: AB: AU Press.
  • Heinrich, R. (1970). Technology and the management of instruction. (Monograph). Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Hodgson, V., de Laat, M., McConnelll, D., & Ryberg, T. (2014). Researching design, experience and practice of networked learning: An overview. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319019390
  • Ikas, K., & Wagner, G. (2008). Communicating in the third space (pp. 1–8). New York: Routledge.
  • Jones, C. (2015). Introduction: The long view – technology, learning and social life. In C. Jones (Ed.), Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks (pp. 1–16). London, UK: Springer International Publishing.
  • Jones, C. R., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning, a relational approach – weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00271.x
  • Koper, R. (2001). Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Heerlen, NL. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55533180.pdf
  • Koper, R. (2005). An introduction to learning design. In R. Koper, & C. Tattersall (Eds.), A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 3–20). Berlin: Springer.
  • Kuhn, T. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition (4th ed). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Laurillard, D. (2016). Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online (pp. vii–xii). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (C. W. Morris, Ed.) (Vol. 13th). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990). Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology1990, 30, 95–101. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44425441
  • Mor, Y., & Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: Reflections upon the current landscape. In ALT-C 2012 Conference (pp. 85–92). Jarfalla, Sweden: Association for Learning Technology (ALT). doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
  • Mor, Y., Craft, B., & Maina, M. (2015). Learning design – definitions, current issues and grand challenges. In M. Maina, B. Craft, & Y. Mor (Eds.), The art and science of learning design (pp. ix–xxv). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Naifeh, S., & Smith, G. W. (2012). Van Gogh: The life. New York, NY: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67. doi: 10.1007/BF02504928
  • Rothwell, W. J., Benscoter, B., King, M., & King, S. B. (2016). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (5th ed). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Mastering+the+Instructional+Design+Process%3A+A+Systematic+Approach%2C+5th+Edition-p-9781118947142
  • Shay, S. (2012). Educational development as a field: Are we there yet? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 311–323. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631520
  • Skinner, B. F. (1961). Why we need teaching machines. Harvard Educational Review, 31(4), 377–398. doi: 10.1037/11324-012
  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Strickroth, S. (2015). Instructional design versus learning design: What is the difference? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/post/Instructional_Design_versus_Learning_Design-Whats_the_difference
  • Vorster, J.-A., & Quinn, L. (2015). Towards shaping the field: Theorising the knowledge in a forma course for academic developers. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 1031–1044. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1070126
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.