The changing topography of student evaluation in higher education: mapping the contemporary terrain

References

• Adams, M. J. D., & Umbach, P. D. (2012). Nonresponse and online student evaluations of teaching: Understanding the influence of salience, fatigue, and academic environments. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 576–591. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9240-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G. (2016). Global perspectives on higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, L., & Norton, L. S. (2018). HEA action research: Practice guide. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441–454. doi: 10.1080/13562510903050228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S., Ginns, P., & Symons, R. (2008). Student surveys on teaching and learning. Final Report. Sydney: The Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Situated learning, reflective practice and conceptual expansion: Effective peer observation for tutor development. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 24–36. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.945163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, S., & Cashin, W. (2014). Student ratings of instruction in college and university courses. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Volume 29 (pp. 279–326). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., & Ryalls, K. R. (2016). Challenging misconceptions about student ratings of instruction (IDEA Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. (2019). Beyond student ratings: Fourteen other sources of evidence to evaluate teaching. In R. Ellis & E. Hogard (Eds.), Handbook of quality assurance for university teaching (pp. 317–344). Abingdon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. doi: 10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Brooman, S., Darwent, S., & Pimor, A. (2015). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663–674. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.910128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, C. (2016). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 84–90. doi: 10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning, J. (2017). Conceptualising student voice in UK higher education: Four theoretical lenses. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 519–531. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1273207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. (1994). The use of the teaching portfolio and student evaluations for summative evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(5), 555–570. doi: 10.2307/2943778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. (1996). Identifying exemplary teachers: Evidence from colleagues, administrators, and alumni. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 51–56. doi: 10.1002/tl.37219966510
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Strawberry Hills: The Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (2017). Speaking of universities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘Student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, S. (2012). Moving beyond face value: Re-envisioning higher education evaluation as a generator of professional knowledge. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6). doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.565114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, S. (2016). Student evaluation in higher education: Reconceptualising the student voice. Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41893-3
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, S. (2017). What contemporary work are student ratings actually doing in higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devanas, M. (2006). Teaching portfolios. In P. Seldin (Ed.), Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service (pp. 110–119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K. (2008). Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(2), 95–106. doi: 10.1080/07294360701805234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Muijs, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2015). Engaged student learning: High impact strategies to enhance student achievement. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2004). ‘New wave’ student voice and the renewal of civic society. London Review of Education, 2, 3. doi: 10.1080/1474846042000302834
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2013). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000195236
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., Cartney, P., Wilkinson, K., Parkinson, J., Cunningham, S., James-Reynolds, C., & Pitt, A. (2017). Literature review on the use of action research in higher education. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1124046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L. (2015). ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 402–411. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammonds, F., Mariano, G. J., Ammons, G., & Chambers, S. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching: Improving teaching quality in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(1), 26–33. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2016.1227388
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. (2003). Student feedback [1]. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1080/13538320308164
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. (2005). A history and critique of quality evaluation in the UK. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 263–276. doi: 10.1108/09684880510700608
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2004). Transforming quality evaluation. Quality in Higher Education, 10(2), 149–165. doi: 10.1080/1353832042000230635
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 4(2). doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henard, F., & Leprince-Ringuet, S. (2008). The path to quality teaching in higher education. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (2000). The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4), 419–434. doi: 10.1080/713699176
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Devitt, S., & Samiei, C. (2010). From Accrington Stanley to academia? The use of league tables and student surveys to determine “quality” in higher education. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 86–100). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Leung, Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009294
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. (Spring 2001). Student ratings: Validity, utility and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 109, 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. J., Connolly, M. E., Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C. R., & Christensen, W. M. (2018). A comparison of student evaluations of instruction vs. Students’ conceptual learning gains. American Journal of Physics, 86(7), 531–535. doi: 10.1119/1.5039330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bunting, K. (2019). Student perceptions of teaching excellence: An analysis of student-led teaching award nomination data. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 63–80. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1461620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4). doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313–4 doi: 10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2009). University rankings, government and social order: Managing the field of higher education according to the logic of performative present-as-future. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies: Studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 584–604). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329. doi: 10.1177/1028315307303544
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319–383). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1994). The use of student evaluations of university teaching to improve teaching effectiveness. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 179–189. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2011.572830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS – Political Science and Politics, 51(3), 648–652. doi: 10.1017/S104909651800001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal, A. C. M., Stein, S. J., & Golding, C. (2016). Can you increase teacher engagement with evaluation simply by improving the evaluation system? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 286–300. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1007838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Tertiary Education Union. (2018). In P. Kniest (Ed.), Staff experience of student evaluation of teaching and subjects/units. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/f8d7880d-en.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. A. M., Biederman, L. A., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T. M., & Roe, K. (2019). Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLoS ONE, 14(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powney, J., & Hall, S. (1998). Closing the loop: The Impact of student feedback on students’ subsequent learning. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193
   Google Scholar
• Sabri, D. (2011). What’s wrong with ‘the student experience’? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5), 657–667. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2011.620750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri, D. (2013). Student evaluations of teaching as “fact-totems”: The case of the UK national student survey. Sociological Research Online, doi: 10.5153/sro.3136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., Gordon, S., & Buchanan, J. (2008). What are we missing here? Problematising wisdoms on teaching quality and professionalism in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 537–547. doi: 10.1080/13562510802334772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2013). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 995–1015. doi: 10.1080/01411920903342038
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., Gibson, S., Haynes, J., & Potter, A. (2015). Power and resistance: Reflections on the rhetoric and reality of using participatory methods to promote student voice and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 534–552. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.938264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Anderson, K. J. (2005). Students’ ratings of professors: The teaching style contingency for Latino/a professors. Journal of Latinos and Education, 4(2), 115–136. doi: 10.1207/s1532771xjle0402_4
   Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Vandermoere, F., Vanderstraeten, R., & Pepermans, K. (2017). Exploring high impact scholarship in research on student’s evaluation of teaching (SET). Educational Research Review, 22, 129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, P., & Freishtat, R. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen Research, 1–7. doi: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AOFRQA.v1
   Google Scholar
• Stark, P., Ottoboni, K., & Boring, A. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Research, doi: 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1
   Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasey, C., & Carroll, L. (2016). How do we evaluate teaching? Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/article/how-do-we-evaluate-teaching#.W1DxAdhKhns
   Google Scholar
• Young, K., Joines, J., Standish, T., & Gallagher, V. (2019). Student evaluations of teaching: The impact of faculty procedures on response rates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 37–49. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1467878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 55–76. doi: 10.1080/13562510601102131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar