References
- Atjonen, P. (2018). Ethics in peer review of academic journal articles as perceived by authors in the educational sciences. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9308-3
- Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants. PLoS One, 5(12), e14331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014331
- Chong, S., & Lin, T. (2023). Feedback practices in journal peer-review: A systematic literature review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2164757
- Falkenberg, L., & Soranno, P. (2018). Reviewing reviews: An evaluation of peer reviews of journal article submissions. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10217
- Garcia-Costa, D., Squazzoni, F., Mehmani, B., & Grimaldo, F. (2022). Measuring the developmental function of peer review: A multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals. PeerJ, 10, e13539. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13539
- Hamilton, D., Fraser, H., Hoekstra, R., & Fidler, F. (2020). Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review. eLife, 9, e62529. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62529
- Hewings, M. (2004). An ‘Important Contribution’ or ‘Tiresome Reading’? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.3.247
- Kumar, P., Rafiq, I., & Imam, B. (2011). Negotiation on the assessment of research articles with academic reviewers: Application of peer-review approach of teaching. Higher Education, 62(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9390-y
- Peters, D., & Ceci, S. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00011183
- Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2015). From manuscript evaluation to article valuation: The changing technologies of journal peer review. Human Studies, 38(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z
- Thelwall, M. (2023). Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes and length. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221079345
- Tight, M. (2003). Reviewing the reviewers. Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832032000151157
- Tight, M. (2022). Is peer review fit for purpose? In E. Forsberg, L. Geschwind, S. Levander, & W. Wermke (Eds.), Peer review in an era of academic evaluative culture (pp. 223–241). Palgrave Macmillan.