Evaluating an earlybird scheme: encouraging early assignment writing and revising

References

• Bailey , J. and Vardi , I. 1999 . “ Iterative feedback: Impacts on student writing ” . In HERDSA Annual International Conference , 1 – 14 . Melbourne : HERDSA Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Beason , L. 1993 . Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum . Research in the Teaching of English , 27 (4) : 395 – 422 .
   Google Scholar
• Biggs , J. 1999 . What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning . Higher Education Research & Development , 18 (1) : 57 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Daft , R.L. 1985 . “ Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it ” . In Publishing in the Organizational Sciences , Edited by: Cummings , L.L. and Frost , P.J. 193 – 209 . Homewood : Irwin .
   Google Scholar
• Ding , L. 1997 . “ Improving assessment feedback in higher education: Voices from students and teachers ” . In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference , University of York .
   Google Scholar
• Earley , P.C. , Northcraft , G.B. , Lee , C. and Lituchy , T.R. 1990 . Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance . Academy of Management Journal , 33 (1) : 87 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , M. 1977 . Feedback, a necessary condition for the goal‐setting performance relationship . Journal of Applied Psychology , 62 : 454 – 463 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , M. and Kanfer , F.H. 1983 . The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance . Academy of Management Review , 8 (3) : 454 – 463 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins , R. , Hartley , P. and Skelton , A. 2002 . The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning . Studies in Higher Education , 27 (1) : 53 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland , P. 2000 . “ Learning from feedback on assessment ” . In The practice of university history teaching , Edited by: Hyland , P. and Booth , A. Manchester : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Leki , I. 1990 . “ Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 57 – 68 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Locke , E.A. and Latham , G.P. 1990 . A theory of goal setting and task performance , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Mallonee , B.C. and Breihan , J.R. 1985 . Responding to students’ drafts: Interdisciplinary consensus . College Composition and Communication , 36 (2) : 213 – 231 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton , F. and Saljo , R. 1976 . On qualitative differences in learning. I – Outcome and process . British Journal of Educational Psychology , 46 (1) : 4 – 11 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch , A. 2003 . Exploring the practice of feedback to students . Active Learning in Higher Education , 4 (1) : 24 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Napoli , A.R. and Raymond , L. A. 2004 . How reliable are our assessment data? A comparison of the reliability of data produced in graded and un‐graded conditions . Research in Higher Education , 45 (8) : 921 – 929 .
   Google Scholar
• Sitko , B. 1993 . “ Exploring feedback: Writers meet readers ” . In Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom , Edited by: Penrose , A. and Sitko , B. 170 – 187 . New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sommers , N. 1982 . Responding to student writing . College Composition and Communication , 33 (2) : 148 – 156 .
   Google Scholar
• Topping , K.J. , Smith , E.F. , Swanson , I. and Elliot , A. 2000 . Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 (2) : 149 – 169 .
   Google Scholar
• Uemlianin , I.A. 2000 . Engaging text: Assessing paraphrase and understanding . Studies in Higher Education , 25 (3) : 347 – 358 .
   Google Scholar
• Willingham , D.B. 1990 . Effective feedback on written assignments . Teaching of Psychology , 17 (1) : 10 – 13 .
   Google Scholar