References
- Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40.
- Anderson, T. (2012). Networks, Web 2.0, and the connected learner. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 299–308). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58, 797–807.
- Carr, J. M. (2012). Does math achievement “h'APP'en” when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 269–286.
- Carrington, A. (2013). Padagogy wheel. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/bloomsblog
- Eberline, A. D., & Richards, K. A. R. (2013). Teaching with technology in physical education. Strategies, 26(6), 38–39.
- edSurge Newsletters. (2014). 4.5 million (and counting) iPads in U.S. schools. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/n/2013-03-01-4-5-million-and-counting-ipads-in-u-s-schools
- Fernandez-Lopez, A., Rodriguez-Fortiz, M., Rodriguez-Almendros, M., & Martinez-Segura, M. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61, 77–90.
- Fink, L. D. (2002). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using iPads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45, 758–768.
- Heer, R. (2011). A model of learning objectives — Based on “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives.” Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/RevisedBlooms1.html
- Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62, 233–252. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.767917
- Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology and education reform in Studies of Education Reform Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not? Techtrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 55(6), 42–48.
- O'Malley, P., Lewis, M. B., & Donehower, C. (2013b, April–May). Using tablet computers as instructional tools to increase task completion by students with autism. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. Abstract retrieved from http://ERIC.ed.gov/?id=ED541157
- PC Magazine Digital Edition. (2014). Definition of: Mobile 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/61684/mobile-2-0
- Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey. (2014). Retrieved from http://pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/Pearson-HE-Student-Mobile-Device-Survey-PUBLIC-Report-051614.pdf
- Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children's media use in America 2013: A common sense media research study (Common Sense Media's Program for the Study of Children and Media). Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
- Shumack, K., Reilly, E., & Chamberlain, N. (2013). QR Code mania! Strategies, 26(3), 9–12.
- Sullivan, R. M. (2013). The tablet inscribed: Inclusive writing instruction with the iPad. College Teaching, 61, 1–2.
- Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.