Assessment of cataloging services in an academic library

References

• Association of College and Research Libraries. (2010). The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from www.acrl.ala.org/value.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, A., & Krug, T. (2007). New techniques in library technical services at the Appalachian College Association. In M. Mitchell (Ed.), Library workflow redesign: Six case studies (pp. 8–20). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Chercourt, M., & Marshall, L. (2013). Making keywords work: Connecting patrons to resources through enhanced bibliographic records. Technical Services Quarterly, 30, 285–295. doi:10.1080/07317131.2013.785786.
   Google Scholar
• Dinkins, D., & Kirkland, L. N. (2006). It's what's inside that counts: Adding contents notes to bibliographic records and its impact on circulation. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 13, 59–71. doi:10.1300/J106v13n01_07.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sherbini, M., & Chen, S. (2011). An assessment of the need to provide non-Roman subject access to the library online catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 457–483.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, T., & Harker, K. R. (2015). Planning for the budget-ocalypse: The evolution of a serials/ER cancellation methodology. The Serials Librarian, 68, 282–289. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1025657.
   Google Scholar
• Faiks, A., Radermacher, A., & Sheehan, A. (2007). What about the book: Google-izing the catalog with tables of contents. Library Philosophy & Practice, paper 125. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/125.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout, M. (2007). Preparing an item for circulation while streamlining the workflow between the acquisitions and cataloging offices. Indiana Libraries, 26, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, D. (2005). Online work tools: A look at 20 academic libraries technical services Web pages. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 29, 395–402. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2006.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker, K. R., & Kizhakkethil, P. (2015). The quick and the dirty: The good, the bad, and the ugly of database overlap at the journal title level. The Serials Librarian, 68, 249–254. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1016858.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, K. R., & Sassen, C. (2015). Enhancing access to e-books. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, G., Cheng, D. T., Leslie, J., & Harry, T. (2006). Technical services cataloging and database maintenance assessment. Technical Services Quarterly, 23, 51–72. doi:10.1300/J124v23n03_04.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, G., Leslie, J., Harry, T., & Cheng, D. T. (2006). Technical services serials and monographic ordering assessment. Technical Services Quarterly, 24, 45–62. doi:10.1300/J124v24n01_04.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, L. N. (2013). The relationship of metadata to item circulation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51, 510–531.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, G. S. (1991). Subject enhancement: Report on an experiment. College & Research Libraries, 52, 65–79. doi:10.5860/crl_52_01_65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring, C. B. (2007). Increasing productivity through workflow redesign at Smith College. In M. Mitchell (Ed.), Library workflow redesign: Six case studies (pp. 50–59). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Madarash-Hill, C., & Hill, J. B. (2004). Enhancing access to IEEE Conference proceedings: A case study in the application of IEEE Xplore full text and table of contents enhancements. Science & Technology Libraries, 24(3/4), 389–399.
   Google Scholar
• Madarash-Hill, C., & Hill, J. B. (2005). Electronically enriched enhancements in catalog records: A use study of books described on records with URL enhancements versus those without. Technical Services Quarterly, 23, 19–31. doi:10.1300/J124v23n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, N. (2007). Managing electronic resources in the Tri-College Consortium. In M. Mitchell (Ed.), Library workflow redesign: Six case studies (pp. 60–72). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. (2013). Assessing the value of metadata in information services. Technical Services Quarterly, 30, 187–200. doi:10.1080/07317131.2013.759828.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. C. T. (2001). Online tables of contents for books: Effect on usage. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89, 29–36, Medline.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mugridge, R. L. (2014). Technical services assessment: A survey of Pennsylvania academic libraries. Library Resources and Technical Services, 58, 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugridge, R. L., & Poehlmann, N. M. (2015). Benchmarking as an assessment tool for cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly, 32, 141–159. doi:10.1080/07317131.2015.998465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundle, K., Huie, H., & Bangalore, N. S. (2006). ARL library catalog department web sites: An evaluative survey. Library Resources & Technical Services, 50, 173–185. doi:10.5860/lrts.50n3.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. (2012). Walking away from the American Chemical Society  [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.attemptingelegance.com/?p = 1765 Walking away from the American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R., & Howland, J. L. (2011). Shelf-ready: A cost-benefit analysis. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 35, 129–134. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2011.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249–271. doi:10.1177/1525822X08317085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalberg, E., & Cronin, C. (2011). Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control. Library Resources & Technical Services, 55, 124–137. doi:10.5860/lrts.55n3.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouthuysen, K., Swiggers, M., Reheul, A., & Roodhooft, F. (2010). Time-driven activity-based costing for a library acquisition process: A case study in a Belgian university. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 34, 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2010.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosaka, Y., & Weng, C. (2011). Reexamining content-enriched access: Its effect on usage and discovery. College & Research Libraries, 72, 412–427. doi:10.5860/crl-137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. (2004). Applying program assessment techniques to electronic resources management. Technical Services Quarterly, 22(1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2015). An afterword on leadership for the road ahead. In Bell, S., Dempsey, L., Fister, B. (2015) New roles for the road ahead: Essays commissioned for ACRL's 75th anniversary (pp. 103–107). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/new_roles_75th.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & White, L. S. (2007). Library assessment. SPEC Kit 303. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, P. W., & Kurt, L. (2011). Nine years after implementing the unthinkable: The cessation of periodical check-in at the University of Nevada, Reno. Serials Librarian, 61(2), 231–252.
   Google Scholar