Trainee Practitioners’ Experiences of the Psychodynamic Supervisory Relationship and Supervision: A Thematic Analysis

References

• Baum, N. (2011). Social work students’ feelings and concerns about the ending of their fieldwork supervision. Social Work Education, 30, 83–97. doi:10.1080/02615471003743388.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. S., & Buchholz, E. S. (1993). On becoming a supervisee: Preparation for learning in a supervisory relationship. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30(1), 86–92. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.30.1.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Carifio, M. S., & Hess, A. K. (1987). Who is the ideal supervisor? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 244–250. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.18.3.244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Z., & Hatcher, S. (2008). The experiences of trainee psychiatrists learning a psychodynamic psychotherapy model: A grounded theory study. Australasian Psychiatry, 16, 438–441. doi:10.1080/10398560802307688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. (2008). Terminating therapy: A professional guide to ending on a positive note. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V. (2001). Harmful supervision, a cause for alarm: Comment on Gray et al. (2001) and Nelson and Friedlander (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 401–406. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10806-000.
   Google Scholar
• Frawley-O'Dea, M. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 355–366. doi:10.1080/10481881309348739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frawley-O'Dea, M., & Sarnat, J. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frølund, L., & Nielsen, J. (2009). The reflective meta-dialogue in psychodynamic supervision. Nordic Psychology, 61(4), 85–105. doi:10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola, N., & Theriault, A. (2007). Super- (and not-so-super-) vision of counsellors-in-training: Supervisee perspectives on broadening and narrowing processes. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 35, 189–204. doi:10.1080/03069880701256601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. J. (2011). The real relationship in psychotherapy: The hidden foundation of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12349-000.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (Ed.). (2001). The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., Schofield, M. J., & Crawford, S. (2012). Managing difficulties in supervision: Supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 528–541. doi:10.1037/a0030000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregurek, R. (2007). Internal and external boundaries of supervision. Group Analysis, 40, 167–177. doi:10.1080/07351690801962455.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, P. H. (2003). The value of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 21(1), 97–110. doi:10.1300/J001v21n01_07.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. A., Hill, C. E., Holmes, S. E., & Freitas, G. F. (2005). Supervisor perspective on the process and outcome of giving easy, difficult, or no feedback to supervisees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2004). Psychodynamic counselling in action (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–224). West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Constantine, M. G., Miller, K., Erickson, C. D., & Muse-Burke, J. L. (2000). Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 47, 102–115. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10958-000.
   Google Scholar
• Langs, R. (1994). Doing supervision and being supervised. London, England: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lemma, A. (2003). Introduction to the practice of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, G. (2002). Supervision: Between collusion and control. In C. Driver & E. Martin (Eds.), Supervising psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic perspectives (pp. 38–50). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mattar, S., & Vogel, E. B. (2014). The quality of the evidence: Qualitative research in trauma psychology. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10, 363–375. doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i2.750.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 565–584. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.17.3.565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (1998). An introduction to counselling (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2003). Doing counselling research. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, B. W., & Worthen, V. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of “good” supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25–34. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, M. (2008). Expectations of supervision: Everything to everyone?… or “nothing to no-one”? In Division of Counselling Psychology (Ed.), Occasional papers in supervision (pp. 73–79). Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omand, L. (2009). Supervision in counselling and psychotherapy: An introduction. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, G. L., & Kanter, C. N. (1984). Mutuality in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 21(2), 178–183. doi:10.1037/h0085969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52, 137–145. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to research methods. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raisanen, T., Cachia, P., & Milton, M. (2010). Guest editorial: Psychodynamic contributions to counselling psychology practice. Counselling Psychology Review, 25(2), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Sanchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Osachy Touster, L., Wright, L. K., … Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197–202. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelt, S., & Skjerve, J. (2001). Supervision of inexperienced therapists: A qualitative analysis. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(2), 25–43. doi:10.1300/J001v19n02_02.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, S. A., & Bretz, K. M. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 558–566. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizq, R. (2010). Psychodynamic approaches. In R. Woolfe, S. Strawbridge, B. Douglas, & W. Dryden (Eds.), Handbook of counselling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 85–104). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30, 5–44. doi:10.1177/089484530303000102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. (2010). Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(1), 20–27. doi:10.1037/a0018846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. E. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 151–160. doi:10.1007/s10879-011-9201-5.
   Google Scholar
• Schamess, G. (2012). Mutual influence in psychodynamic supervision. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82, 142–160. doi:10.1080/00377317.2012.693012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovholt, T., & Jennings, L. (2005). Mastery and expertise in counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 13–18. doi:10.17744/mehc.27.1.gnblmy6g3dbqduq4.
   Google Scholar
• Skovholt, T. M., & Rønnestad, M. H. (1992). Themes in therapist and counsellor development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 505–515. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01646.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimmel, B. (1995). Resistance to awareness of the supervisor's transferences with special reference to the parallel process. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76, 609–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2011). The intimate insider: Negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research, 11, 3–22. doi:10.1177/1468794110384447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor's blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 243–258. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pap/.
   Google Scholar
• Veach, P. M. (2001). Conflict and counterproductivity in supervision—when relationships are less than ideal: Comment on Nelson and Friedlander (2001) and Gray et al. (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 396–400. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. Jr. (2011). The real relationship in psychotherapy supervision. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 65, 99–116. Retrieved from http://www.ajp.org/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. Jr. (2012). Moments of real relationship in psychoanalytic supervision. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 251–268. doi:10.1057/ajp.2012.14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. Jr. (2013). The contemporary practice of effective psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 300–328. doi:10.1037/a0030896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. Jr. (2015). Toward a research-informed, evidence-based psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 29, 5–19. doi:10.1080/02668734.2014.980305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. Jr., & Scaturo, D. J. (2013). Toward an integrative, learning-based model of psychotherapy supervision: Supervisory alliance, educational interventions, and supervisee learning/relearning. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 75–95. doi:10.1037/a0031330.
   Google Scholar
• West, W. (2003). The culture of psychotherapy supervision. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 3, 123–127. doi:10.1080/14733140312331384492.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J. (2007). The analyst's countertransference when supervising: Friend or foe? Journal of Analytical Psychology, 52, 51–69. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00640.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2008). Focus groups. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 186–206). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2012). Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Home is where we start from: Essays by a psychoanalyst. London, England: Penguin. (Original work published 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Woolfe, R., & Tholstrup, M. (2010). Supervision. In R. Woolfe, S. Strawbridge, B. Douglas, & W. Dryden (Eds.), Handbook of counselling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 590–608). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 235–251). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar