Relational processes and power dynamics in psychoanalytic group supervision: a discourse analysis

References

• Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26(4), 1–11, 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, L. (2008). Psychodynamic supervision in a group setting: Benefits and limitations. Psychotherapy in Australia, 14(2), 36–41. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.544462087968759
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory into practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arribas-Ayllon, M., & Walkerdine, V. (2017). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 110–123). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. E., & Molzon, C. H. (2014). Clinical supervision of psychotherapy: Essential ethics issues for supervisors and supervisees. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H., Burlingame, G., Flores, P., Greene, L., Joyce, A., Kobos, J. C., … Feirman, D. (2008). Clinical practice guidelines for group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58(4), 455–542. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.4.455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(l), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000083111007
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, W. (1979). Group tutoring: Concepts and case studies. Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715421
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. W., Enyedy, K. C., Goodyear, R. K., Arcinue, F., & Puri, N. N. (2009). Concept mapping of the events supervisees find helpful in group supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang-Caffaro, S., & Caffaro, J. (2021). When coleaders differ: Rupture and repair in group psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 74(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20200035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. M., & Kline, W. B. (2001). Anxiety as a condition for learning in group supervision. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 26(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933920108413786
   Google Scholar
• Collens, P., & Van Hout, F. (2017). Learning in psychotherapy group supervision: Transcending complementarity and the generative potential of group conflict. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 33(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. M., McKibben, W. B., & Wind, S. A. (2018). Supervisee perception of power in clinical supervision: The power dynamics in supervision scale. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, J. (1990). Ethnomethodological sociology. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, T. P., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2008). Is therapist alliance or whole group cohesion more influential in group psychotherapy outcomes? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15(4), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. (2020). Precarious. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/precarious
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehrman, M. J. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40, 9–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, C. F., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2018). Alliance rupture repair: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubanks, C. F., Warren, J. T., & Muran, J. C. (2021). Identifying ruptures and repairs in alliance-focused training group supervision. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 71(2), 275–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2020.1805618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., Mulac, A., & Dindia, K. (1995). Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14(1–2), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X95141002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fors, M. (2018). Dynamics of power and privilege. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gediman, H. K. (2001). The supervisory process: Triadic system and beyond. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49(3), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651010490030801
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gediman, H. K., & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49(2), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1980.11926914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgaca, E., & Avdi, E. (2012). Discourse analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 147–161). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. S., & Dekkers, T. D. (2010). Attending to power and diversity in supervision: An exploration of supervisee learning outcomes and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 22(4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2010.528703
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, A. E. (2020). The supervisory alliance in group supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, E. L. (1982). Interactional structure of the supervision interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, E. L., Freund, R. D., Gardner, S. L., Nelson, M. L., & Walker, B. R. (1989). Relation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision : An analysis of discourse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, E. L., & Johnston, R. (1985). Group supervision: Widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education and Supervision, 24(4), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1985.tb00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, F. (2008). Managing stress or enhancing wellbeing? Positive psychology’s contributions to clinical supervision. Australian Psychologist, 43(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060801978647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D. A. (2007). Developing playfulness, acceptance, curiosity, and empathy (PACE): The central therapeutic stance. In D. A. Hughes (Ed.), Attachment-focused family therapy (pp. 61–94). WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, A. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01589.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2017). The sociology of gender. In K. O. Koregn (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of sociology (pp. 264–273). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Madill, A., Koutsopoulou, G. Z., Brown, C., & Harris, R. (2020, July 24). Tackling gender imbalance in psychology. BPS. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/tackling-gender-imbalance-psychology
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (1997). The effectiveness of psychotherapy supervision. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 421–446). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C. (1991). Influence and involvement in children’s discourse: Age, gender, and partner effects. Child Development, 62(4), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relation- ships. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences (pp. 67–86). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, C. C. (1994). Post-structuralism and sociology. In S. Seidman (Ed.), The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory (pp. 265–281). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livni, D., Crowe, T. P., & Gonsalvez, C. J. (2012). Effects of supervision modality and intensity on alliance and outcomes for the supervisee. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45(4), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, B. W., & Worthen, V. (1989). The parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20(5), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.20.5.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision. Principles and practice. BPS Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moghe, S. C., & Barnett, J. E. (2006). What makes for effective supervision anyway? The Maryland Psychologist, 52(2), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. J., & Wright, D. W. (2005). Supervisees’ perspectives of power use in supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, J., & Salomonsson, B. (2005). ‘Weaving thoughts’: A method for presenting and commenting psychoanalytic case material in a peer group. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(5), 1281–1298. https://doi.org/10.1516/BVA5-H1MV-JF7E-GLJF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, A., Halford, W. K., & Walters, B. (2011). Towards best practice supervision of clinical psychology trainees. Australian Psychologist, 46(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00033.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ögren, M., Apelman, A., & Klawitter, M. (2001). The group in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v20n02_12
   Google Scholar
• Ögren, M. L., Boëthius, S. B., & Sundin, E. (2014). Challenges and possibilities in group supervision. In C. E. Watkins Jr. & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 648–669). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84(2), 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., Edwards, D., & Wetherell, M. (1993). A model of discourse in action. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(3), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293036003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing discourse. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., Wetherell, M., Gill, R., & Edwards, D. (1990). Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089008572999
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, B. (1987). Supervision: A cooperative exercise in accountability. In M. Marken & M. Payne (Eds.), Enabling and ensuring supervision in practice (pp. 21–34). Leicester National Youth Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, B., & Inskipp, F. (2001). Group supervision. In J. Scaife (Ed.), Supervision in mental health professions. A practitioner’s guide (pp. 99–121). Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primavera, L. H., & Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v15n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, K., & Murachver, T. (2003). Children’s speech accommodation to gendered language styles. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03255304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutan, J. S. (2021). Rupture and repair: Using leader errors in psychodynamic group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 71(2), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2020.1808471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomonsson, B. (2019). Defensive patterns in reflective group supervisions at child health centres. Infant Mental Health Journal, 40(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. E. (1997). The contribution of a process-oriented case conference to the development of students in the first year of a doctor of psychology training program. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v15n02_12
   Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. E. (2019). What’s new in parallel process? The evolution of supervision’s signature phenomenon. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79(3), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-019-09202-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scanlon, C. (2000). The place of clinical supervision in the training of group-analytic psychotherapists: Towards a group-dynamic model for professional education? Group Analysis, 33(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160022077272
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, C. (2002). Group supervision of individual cases in the training of counsellors and psychotherapists: Towards a group-analytic model? British Journal of Psychotherapy, 19(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2002.tb00075.x
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt Neven, R. (2010). Practicalities of therapeutic communication. In R. S. Neven (Ed.), Core principles of assessment and therapeutic communication with children, adolescents and families (pp. 74–96). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundin, E. C., Ögren, M., & Jonsson, C. (2005). Group supervision in psychotherapy: The relationship between focus, group climate, and perceived attained skill. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szecsödy, I. (2013). Supervision should be a mutual learning experience. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 36(2), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2013.857924
   Google Scholar
• Urmanche, A. A., Minges, M., Eubanks, C. F., Gorman, B. S., & Muran, J. C. (2021). Deepening the group training experience: Group cohesion and supervision impact in alliance-focused training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, A. L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Sellers, T. P. (2016). The benefits of group supervision and a recommended structure for implementation. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(4), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0138-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 459–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E., & Holloway, E. (1997). Methodology, design and evaluation in psycho- therapy supervision research. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 11–27). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. Psychoanalytic Review, 98(4), 557–590. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2011.98.4.557
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, C. E., Jr., Hook, J. N., Ramaeker, J., & Ramos, M. J. (2016). Repairing the ruptured supervisory alliance: Humility as a foundational virtue in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2015.1127190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbart, A., Aldén, S., & Diedrichs, A. (2017). Changes in the anaclitic-introjective personality configurations following psychoanalytic psychotherapy with young adults. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 20(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2017.239
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2008). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 73–90). Sage.
   Google Scholar