Theorizing Formal Pluralism: Quantification of Legal Pluralism for Spatio – Temporal Analysis

References

• Benda-Beckmann, Franz von 1997 ’Citizens, strangers and indigenous peoples: conceptual politics and legal pluralism.’ Law & Anthropology 9: 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von 2001 ’Legal pluralism.’ Tai Culture, 6: 18–40.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, L. 2002 Law and Colonial Cultures. Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, R. 1995 ’Nomos and narrative.’ Pp. 95–172 in M. Minow, M. Ryan and A. Sarat (eds.), Narrative, Violence and the Law. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darian-Smith, E., and P. Fitzpatrick (eds.) 1999 Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. B. 1995 Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, Peter 1983 ’Law, plurality and underdevelopment.’ Pp. 159–182 in D. Sugarman (ed.), Legality, Ideology and the State. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, Peter 1984 ’Law and Societies.’ Osgoode Hall Law Journel 22: 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, Marc and R. Dhavan 1989 Law and Society in Modern India. Delhi ; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John 1986 ’What is Legal Pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A.. and R.C.R. Taylor 1996 ’Political Science and the three new institutionalisms.’ Political Studies 44: 936–957.
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, M. B. 1975 Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, A. 1993 Explorations in Law and Society: Toward A Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G.J. 2001 Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S.T. 2001 ’The Shari’at courts in modern India.’ Unpublished Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, T. 2002 The Muslim law of India (3rd ed.). New Delhi: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and D. Rueschemeyer 2003 Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S.E. 1988 ’Legal Pluralism.’ Law & Society Review 22: 869–896.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J.S. 2001 State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 1991 ’The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics.’ American Political Science Review 85: 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990 Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1991 ’Institutions.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000 ’Increasing returns, path dependency, and the study of politics.’ American Political Science Review 94: 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 2004 Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. 1984 ’Guidelines for concept analysis.’ Pp. 15–88 in G. Sartori (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, W., and D. NINA, 2001 The Other Law: Non-State Ordering in South Africa. Lansdowne: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Sezgin, Y. 2004 ’A political account for legal confrontation between state and society: the case of Israeli legal pluralism.’ Pp. 199–235 in A. Sarat and P. Ewick (eds.), Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 32. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Silbey, S.S. 1992 ’Making a place for cultural analyses of law.’ Law & Social Inquiry 17: 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, F. 1981 ’Anthropology, dispute processes and law: a critical introduction.’ British Journal of Law & Society 8: 141–180.
   Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, B.Z. 1993 ’The folly of the “social scientific“ concept of legal pluralism.’ Journal of Law and Society 20: 192–217.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 1999 ’Historical institutionalism in comparative politics.’ Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. 2000 Colonial Citizens: Republican Rights, Paternal Privilege, and Gender in French Syria and Lebanon. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, R.M. 1976 Law in Modern Society. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderlinden, J. 1989 ’Return to legal pluralism: twenty years later.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 28: 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. 2001 The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, G.R. 1999 ’The idea of legal pluralism.’ Pp. 3–19 in B. Dupret, M. Berger and L. al-Zwaini (eds.), Legal Pluralism in the Arab World. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I. 1999 Dynamic Legal Pluralism and The Reconstruction of Unofficial Muslim Laws in England, Turkey and Pakistan. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, SOAS, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I. 2005 Muslim Laws, Politics and Society in Modern Nation States: Dynamic Legal Pluralisms in England, Turkey and Pakistan. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Young, C. 1994 The African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar