Playing Off Courts: The Negotiation of Divorce and Violence in Plural Legal Settings in Kolkata

References

• Abu-Lughod, Lila 1993 ‘The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power Through Bedouin Women.’ Pp. 102–103 in Stevi Jackson et al. (eds.), Women’s Studies: Essential Readings. New York: New York UP.
   Google Scholar
• Anjali 1995 ‘The Pathos of Family Courts.’ The Pioneer April 9: 16.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, Jerold S. 1983 Justice Without Law? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, Srimati 1999 She Comes to Take Her Rights: Indian Women, Property and Propriety. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Research 2005a Stop Violence Against Women: From Womb to Tomb, Annual Report. New Delhi: Centre for Social Research. India.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Social Research 2005b ‘Section 498A, IPC: Used or Misused?’ New Delhi: CSR India. COOMARASWAMY, Radhika 2005 ‘The Varied Contours of Violence Against Women in South Asia.’ Report Prepared for the Fifth South Asia Regional Ministerial Conference Celebrating Beijing Plus Ten, Jointly Organized by Government of Pakistan and UNIFEM South Asia Regional Office, 3–5 May.
   Google Scholar
• Das, Prafulla 1996 ‘For and Against Family Courts.’ The Hindu September 30: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Demain, Melissa 2003 ‘Custom in the Courtroom, Law in the Village: Legal Transformations in Papua New Guinea’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.): 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, David 1980 ‘Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court.’ American Bar Foundation Research Journal 5: 425–454.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Chris 1994 ‘Legal Anthropology: Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought.’ Anthropology Today 10: 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford 1983 ‘Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective.’ Pp. 167–233 in Clifford Geertz, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, Carol J., Barbara Yngvesson and David M. Engel 1994 Law and Community in Three American Towns. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John 1986 ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 38.
   Google Scholar
• ICRW (International Center for Research on Women) 2002 Men, Masculinity and Domestic Violence in India: Summary Report of Four Studies. Series: Domestic Violence in India: Exploring Strategies, Promoting Dialogue #5. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Just, Peter 2000 Dou Donggo Justice: Conflict and Morality in an Indonesian Society. Oxfrod: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus-Black, Mindie and Susan F. Hirsch 1999 ‘Performance and Paradox: Exploring Law’s Role in Hegemony and Resistance.’ Pp. 1–31 in Mindie Lazarus-Black and Susan F. Hirsch (eds.), Contested States: Law, Hegemony and Resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, Madhu 1998 ‘Exploring the Boundaries of Law, Gender and Social Reform.’ Feminist Legal Studies 6: 59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engle 1986 ‘Everyday understandings of law in working-class America.’ American Ethnologist 13: 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engle 1988 ‘Legal Pluralism.’ Law and Society Review 22: 868–896.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, Nishi 1999 ‘Best Practices among Responses to Domestic Violence in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh.’ Pp. 18–27 in PROWID.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Erin P. 1999 ‘Law’s Patriarchy in India.’ Pp. 88–117 in Mindie Lazarus-Black and Susan F. Hirsch (eds.), Contested States: Law, Hegemony and Resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, Uma. 1997. ‘Cross-Cultural Connections, Border-Crossings and “Death by Culture”: Thinking about Dowry-Murders in India and Domestic- Violence Murders in the United States.’ Pp. 81–118 in Uma Narayan, Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions and Third-World Feminism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, Rekha 2002 ‘The Public Face of a Private Domestic Violence.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 4: 342–367.
   Google Scholar
• Prowid 1999 Domestic Violence in India: A Summary Report of Three Studies. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Purna 1999 ‘Enhancing Women’s Choices in Responding to Domestic Violence in Calcutta: A Comparison of Employment and Education.’ The European Journal of Development Research 11: 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, Rakesh 2005 ‘SC Upholds Constitutionality of S 498A.’ InfoChange News and Features, August. http://www.infochangeindia.org/analysis86.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Kirti 1996 ‘Family Courts.’ The Pioneer April 17: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Solanki, Gopika 2001 ‘Women’s Experiences through the Police Lens: Analysis of Cases Registered under section 498(A).’ Journal of Gender Studies 10: 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, Anuradha 2002 ‘The Shalishi in West Bengal: A Community Response to Domestic Violence.’ Pp. 14–30 in Women Initiated Community Level Responses to Domestic Violence: Summary Report of Three Studies. Series: Domestic Violence in India: Exploring Strategies, Promoting Dialogue #5. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2000 ‘A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.’ Journal of Law and Society 27: 296–321.
   Google Scholar
• Un Wire 2000 ‘India: Domestic Violence Rates Rising.’ Women’s International Network News. 26: 62.
   Google Scholar
• Visaria, Leela 1999 ‘Violence Against Women in India: Evidence from Rural Gujarat.’ Pp 9- 17 in PROWID.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization) 2002 World Report on Violence and Health: Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization
   Google Scholar