462
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Restorative and flexible customary procedures and their gendered impact: a preliminary view on Namibia's formalization of Traditional Courts

&
Pages 291-311 | Received 04 Aug 2014, Accepted 03 Dec 2014, Published online: 22 Jan 2015

References

  • Ambunda, L.N., and S. De Klerk. 2008. Women and Custom in Namibia: A Research Overview. In Women and Custom in Namibia: Cultural Practice versus Gender Equality?, edited by O.C. Ruppel, 43–82. Windhoek: Macmillan Namibia.
  • Ambunda, L.N., and W.T. Mugadza. 2009. “The Protection of Children's Rights in Namibia: Law and Policy.” In Children's Rights in Namibia, edited by O.C. Ruppel, 5–52. Windhoek: Macmillan Education.
  • Amoo, S.K. 2008. “The Structure of the Namibian Judicial System and its Relevance for an Independent Judiciary.” In The Independence of the Judiciary in Namibia, edited by N. Horn and A. Bosl, 69–98. Windhoek: Macmillan Education.
  • Anyolo, P.N. 2010. “Traditional Courts in Action: The Daily Official Activities at the Ombadja Traditional Auhtority, Namibia.” In Search of Justice and Peace: Traditional and Informal Justice Systems in Africa, edited by M.O. Hinz, 53–67. Windhoek: Namibia Scientific Society.
  • Becker, H. 1995. “Community Legal Activator Programme: Evaluation Report.” CASS Papers No. 35.
  • Becker, H. 1998. “Gender Aspects of Traditional Authorities and Customary Courts in Northern Namibia.” In Traditional Authority and Democracy in Southern Africa, edited by M. D’Engelbronner-Kolff, M.O. Hinz, J.L. Sindano and Staff, 257–287. Windhoek: New Namibia Books.
  • Becker, H. 2000. “A Concise History of Gender, Tradition and the State of Namibia.” In State, Society and Democracy, edited by C. Keulder, 171–198. Windhoek: Macmillan Education.
  • Braithwaite, J. 2004. “Restorative Justice and De-Professionalization.” The Good Society 13 (1): 28–31.
  • Bruce, J., O. Garcia-Boliviar, T. Hanstad, M. Roth, R. Nielsen, A. Knox, and J. Schmidt. 2007. Legal Empowerment of the Poor: From Concepts to Assessment. Washington, DC: USAID.
  • CEDAW, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. 2005. Consideration of Reports Submitted by States parties under Article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women – Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports of State Parties, Namibia, CEDAW/C/NAM/2-3 (2 September 2005). Available from undocs.org/cedaw/c/nam/2-3.
  • CEDAW, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. 2007. 37th Session: Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Namibia, CEDAW/C/NAM/CO/3 (2 February 2007). Available from undocs.org/cedaw/c/nam/co/3.
  • Chirayath, L., C. Sage, and M. Woolcock. 2005. Customary Law and Policy Reform: Engaging with the Plurality of Justice Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Chopra, T., and D. Isser. 2012. “Access to Justice and Legal Pluralism in Fragile States: The Case of Women's Rights.” Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 4 (2): 337–358.
  • Clarke, R. 2011. “Customary Legal Empowerment: Towards a More Critical Approach.” In Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment, edited by J. Ubink. Vol. 3, 43–66. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • Golub, S., ed. 2003. Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative. Rule of Law Series: Democracy and Rule of Law Project. Vol. 41. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Golub, S., ed. 2006. “A House without a Foundation.” In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: The Search for Knowledge, edited by T. Carothers, 106–136. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Harper, E. 2011a. “Chapter 1.” In Customary Justice: From Program Design to Impact Evaluation. Vol. 1. Rome: IDLO.
  • Harper, E. 2011b. “Engaging with Customary Justice Systems.” In Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment, edited by J. Ubink. Vol. No. 3/2011, 29–42. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • Hinz, M. 2000. “Introduction, Methodology and Approach.” In Customary Law in Namibia: Development and Perspective, 9–41. Windhoek: Centre for Applied Social Sciences & University of Namibia.
  • Hinz, M. 2010a. “The Ascertainment of Customary Law: What is Ascertainment of Customary Law and what is it for?” In Customary Law Ascertained: The Customary Law of the Owambo, Kavango and Caprivi Communities of Namibia, edited by M.O. Hinz. Vol. 1, 3–11. Windhoek: Namibia Scientific Society.
  • Hinz, M. 2010b. “The Laws of the Caprivi Communities.” In Customary Law Ascertained: The Customary Law of the Owambo, Kavango and Caprivi Communities of Namibia, edited by M.O. Hinz, 407–515. Windhoek: Namibia Scientific Society.
  • Hinz, M. 2010c. “The Uukwambi Traditional Authority.” In Customary Law Ascertained: The Customary Law of the Owambo, Kavango and Caprivi Communities of Namibia, edited by M.O. Hinz, 233–276. Windhoek: Namibia Scientific Society.
  • Horn, N. 2010. “Community Courts in Namibia: Life or Death for Customary Law?” In Search of Justice and Peace: Traditional and Informal Justice Systems in Africa, edited by M.O. Hinz, 115–132. Windhoek: Namibia Scientific Society.
  • International Council on Human Rights Policy. 2009. When Legal Worlds Overlap: Human Rights, State and Non-State Law. International Council on Human Rights Policy: Versoix.
  • Kane, M., J. Oloka-Onyango, and A. Tejan-Cole. 2005. Reassessing Customary Law Systems as a Vehicle for Providing Equitable Access to Justice for the Poor. Arusha: World Bank.
  • Konjore, R. 2013. Traditional Courts Struggle to Get Off Ground. The Namibian, 03 August.
  • Hubbard, D. 2007. “Gender and Sexuality: The Law Reform Landscape.” In Unravelling Taboos: Gender and Sexuality in Namibia, edited by Suzanne LaFont and Dianne Hubbard, 99–129. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre.
  • Meerkotter, A., and R. Watson. 2011. “DFID Malawi Safety Security and Access to Justice Programme Impact Analysis Study 2011.” Draft Report, 30 May 2011.
  • Moore, S.F. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7 (4): 719–746.
  • Nader, Laura. 2001. “The Underside of Conflict Management — in Africa and Elsewhere.” IDS Bulletin 32 (1): 19–27.
  • Nakuta, J., and F. Chipepera. 2010. The Justice Sector & the Rule of Law in Namibia: Management, Personnel and Access. Namibia: Namibia Institute for Democracy, and Human Rights & Documentation Centre.
  • National Planning Commission of Namibia. 2011. “Population and Housing Census: Preliminary Results.” Windhoek: National Planning Commission. Available from http://www.mha.gov.na/documents/10180/34849/2011_Preliminary_Result.pdf/0ea026d4-9687-4851-a693-1b97a1317c60.
  • Nyamu-Musembi, Celestine. 2005. “For Or Against Gender Equality? Evaluating the Post-Cold War ‘Rule of Law’ Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
  • Oomen, B. 2002. “Chiefs! Law, Power and Culture in Contemporary South Africa.” PhD diss., Leiden University.
  • Penal Reform International. 2001. “Access to Justice in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Traditional and Informal Justice Systems.” London: Penal Reform International.
  • Peters, P.E. 2002. “The Limits of Negotiability: Security, Equity and Class.” In Negotiating Property in Africa, edited by K. Juul and C. Lund. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Ruppel, O.C., and L.N. Ambunda. 2011. The Justice Sector and the Rule of Law in Namibia. Namibia: Namibia Institute for Democracy.
  • Sasman, C. 2011. “Traditional Courts found in Poor State.” The Namibian, April 11.
  • Shipton, P. 2002. “Foreword.” In Negotiating Property in Africa, edited by K. Juul and C. Lund, ix–xiii. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
  • SIAPAC (Social Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis Cooperation). 2008. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Study on Factors that may Perpetuate or Protect Namibians from Violence and Discrimination: Caprivi, Erongo, Karas, Kavango, Kunene, Ohangwena, Omaheke, and Otjozondjupa Regions. Windhoek: Ministry of Gender Equality and Child Welfare.
  • The Centre for Restorative Justice. “The Centre for Restorative Justice.” http://www.sfu.ca/crj.html
  • Ubink, J.M. 2008. “Negotiated or Negated? The Rhetoric and Reality of Customary Tenure in an Ashanti Village in Ghana.” Africa 78 (2): 264–287.
  • Ubink, J.M. 2011a. “Gender Equality on the Horizon: The Case of Uukwambi Traditional Authority, Northern Namibia.” In Working with Customary Justice Systems: Post-conflict and Fragile States, edited by E. Harper, 51–71. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • Ubink, J.M. 2011b. “Stating the Customary: An Innovative Approach to the Locally Legitimate Recording of Customary Justice in Namibia.” In Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment, edited by J. Ubink. 131–151. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • Ubink, J.M. 2011c. Towards Customary Legal Empowerment in Namibia – Enhancing Gender Equality in Customary Justice Systems. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • Ubink, J.M. 2014. “Access v. Justice: Customary Courts and Political Oppression, Lessons from Malawi's Local Courts Act.” Paper Presented at the Conference of Chiefship and the Customary in Contemporary Africa, Committee on African Studies; 25 April 2014; Harvard University. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2520154
  • Ubink, J.M., and B. Van Rooij. 2011. “Towards Customary Legal Empowerment: An Introduction.” In Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment, edited by J. Ubink. Vol. 3, 7–28. Rome: International Development Law Organization.
  • United Nations General Assembly. 2012. Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, Note by the Secretary General on the Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, A/67/278 (9 August 2012). Available from undocs.org/a/67/278.
  • Van Rooij, B. 2012. “Bringing Justice to the Poor, Bottom-Up Approaches to Legal Development Cooperation.” Hague Journal on Rule of Law 4 (2): 286–318.
  • Weeks, S.M. 2011. “Beyond the Traditional Courts Bill: Regulating Customary Courts in Line with Living Customary Law and the Constitution.” SA Crime Quarterly 35: 31–40.
  • Weeks, S.M. 2012. “Regulating Vernacular Dispute Resolution Forums: Controversy Concerning the Process, Substance and Implications of South Africa's Traditional Courts Bill.” Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 12 (1): 133–155.
  • Wenzel, M., T.G. Okimoto, N.T. Feather, and M.J. Platow. 2008. “Retributive and Restorative Justice.” Law and Human Behavior 32 (5): 375–389.
  • Whitehead, A., and D. Tsikata. 2003. “Policy Discourses on Women's Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implications of the Re-Turn to the Customary.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3 (1 and 2): 67–112.
  • Wojkowska, E. 2006. Doing Justice: How Informal Justice Systems Can Contribute, edited by UNDP Oslo Governance Centre. Available from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAWJUSTINST/Resources/EwaWojkowska.pdf.
  • Woodhouse, Philip. 2003. “African Enclosures: A Default Mode of Development.” World Development 31 (10): 1705–1720.
  • World Bank Indonesia. 2008. “Forging the Middle Ground: Engaging Non-State Justice in Indonesia.” Indonesia: World Bank. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTJUSFORPOOR/Resources/Forging_the_Middle_Ground_Engaging_Non_State_Justice_in_Indonesia.pdf.
  • Zoila, Hinson, and Dianne Hubbard 2012. Costs and Contingency Fees: Access to Justice in Namibia: Proposals for Improving Public Access to Courts, Volume 3 in series: Access to Justice in Namibia: Proposals for Improving Public Access to Courts edited by Legal Assistance Centre. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre. Available from: http://www.lac.org.na/projects/grap/Pdf/access2justice3_costs.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.