Legal pluralism and the convention on the transfer of sentenced persons in practice: highlighting the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the transfer of sentenced persons within and to Europe

References

• Additional Protocol to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. Strasbourg, 18.XII.1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Serce v Romania. Application no. 35049/08 ( lodged on 15 July 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Altosaar v. Finland. Application no. 9764/03 ( admissibility decision of 2 December 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Altosaar v. Finland. Application no. 9764/03 ( Decision of 15 June 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bassiouni Cherif, M. 2008. “United States Policies and Practices on Execution of Foreign Sentences.” In International Criminal Law: Multilateral and Bilateral Enforcement Mechanisms, Vol. II, 3rd ed., edited by M. Cherif Bassiouni, 551–590. Leiden: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R., R.W. Adger, N.W. Arnell, S. Dercon, A. Geddes, and D. Thomas. 2011. “The Effect of Environmental Change on Human Migration.” Global Environmental Change 21 (1): S1–S11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifazi, C. (ed). 2008. International Migration in Europe: New Trends and New Methods of Analysis. Amsterdam: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, M. 2014. Inside Immigration Detention. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buijen v. Germany. Application no. 27804/05. (1 April 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Čalovskis v. Latvia. Application no. 22205/13 ( judgement of 24 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Čalovskis v. Latvia. Application no. 22205/13 ( Application lodged 28 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Canton, R & Hammond, N. 2012. “Foreigners to Justice? Irregular Migrants and Foreign National Offenders in England and Wales.” European Journal of Probation 4 (3): 4–20
   Google Scholar
• Carlo Caresana v United Kingdom. Application no. 31541/96 ( decision on admissibility 29 August 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ciok v Poland. Application no. 498/10 ( decision 23 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cornelisse, G. 2010. Immigration Detention and Human Rights: Rethinking Territorial Sovereignty. Leiden: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union ( OJ L 327, 5 December 2008, p. 27).
   Google Scholar
• Csoszánszki v Sweden. Application no. 22318/02 (27 June 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Csoszánszki v Sweden. Application no. 22318/02 ( admissibility decision of 26 October 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Czekalla v Portugal. Application no. 38830/97 ( judgement 10 October 2002).
   Google Scholar
• David F Bagguley v George W Bush. 1991. President of the United States 953 F2d 660. 293 US App DC 264, 663, 267.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd and Janousek v France and Spain. Application no. 12747/87 (26 June 1992).
   Google Scholar
• Easton, S. 2010. Prisoners’ Rights: Principles and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, S., and P. Piper. 2012. Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Explanatory Report on the Additional Protocol to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, N., and G. Catney, eds. 2012. Minority Internal Migration in Europe. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giza v Poland. Application no. 1997/11 ( decision of 23 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gropas R., and A. Triandafyllidou. 2007. European Immigration: A Sourcebook. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grori v Albania. Application no. 25336/04 (7 July 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hacisuleymannoğlu v Italy. Application 23241/94 (decision of 20 October 1994).
   Google Scholar
• Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. 2014. “Transferring Sentenced Persons (offenders) to the United Kingdom: Highlighting some of the Human Rights Issues Courts have had to Deal with.” State Practice & International Law Journal 1: 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• King v The United Kingdom. Application no. 9742/07 ( decision of 26 January 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E., A. Phizacklea, P. Raghuram, and R. Sales. 2000. Gender and International Migration in Europe: Employment, Welfare and Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaridis, G. 2011. Security, Insecurity and Migration in Europe. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon v Government of the United States of America and another [2008] UKHL 59.
   Google Scholar
• Müller v the Czech Republic. Application no. 48058/09 ( decision of 6 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Passaris v. Greece (dec.) - 53344/07 ( Decision of 24 September 2009) Information Note on the Court's case-law No. 123, October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Plepi and others v Albania and Greece. Applications nos. 11546/05, 33285/05 and 33288/05 (decision of 4 May 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pornchai Moontri vWarden. Maine State Prison et al [2006] WL 2009072, 2 (DNH).
   Google Scholar
• Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA, 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA on the mutual recognition of judicial decisions on custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty, on probation decisions and alternative sanctions and on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention, COM(2014) 57 final, Brussels, 5.2.2014. Available at http://db.eurocrim.org/db/en/doc/2032.pdf ( accessed 13 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., and H. Codd. 2010. Controversial Issues in Prisons. Berkshire: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Selmouni v France. Application no. 25803/94 ( judgement 28 July 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Smith v. Germany. Application no. 27801/05 ( judgement of 1 April 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Somogyi v. Hungary. Application no. 5770/05 (judgement of 11 January 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Soumare v. France. ( 48/1997/832/1038) (judgement of 24 August 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney v Governor of Loughan House Open Centre and Others [2014] IESC 42.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó v Sweden. Application no. 28578/03 (decision of 26 October 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Szabó v Sweden. Application no. 28578/03 (decision of 27 June 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A., ed. 2012. Irregular Migration in Europe: Myths and Realities. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United States of America, ex rel. Christopher Rickard v Jerry Sternes, Warden; and Donald Snyder, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections 149 FSupp 2d 437, 451.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl Smit, D., and J.R. Spencer. 2010. “The European Dimension to the Release of Sentenced Prisoners.” In Release from Prison: European Policy and Practice, edited by N. Padfield, D. Van Zyl Smit, and F. Dünkel. Devon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veermäe v. Finland. Application 38704/03 ( Decision of 15 3 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Vrancsik v Hungary and Austria. Application no. 16770/07 (decision of 11 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Vratsidis v Greece. Application No. 22719/93 (decision 22 February 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Willcox v the United Kingdom; and Hurford v the United Kingdom. Applications nos. 43759/10 and 43771/12 ( decision of 8 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Wilsher, D. 2012. Immigration Detention: Law, History, Politics. Cambridge: Routledge
   Google Scholar