The ‘best interests of the child’ in a multicultural context: a case study

References

• Alston, Philip. 1994. “The Best Interests Principle: Towards a Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights.” In The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston and UNICEF, 1—25. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, Philip, and UNICEF, eds. 1994. The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• An-Na'im, Abdullahi. 1994. “Cultural Transformation and Normative Consensus on the Best Interests of the Child.” In The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston and UNICEF, 62–81. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereni, Laure, and Alexandre Jaunait. 2009. “Usages de la diversité.” Raisons Politiques 35 (3): 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bronda v. Italy. Application no. 22430/93 (judgement of 9 June 1998). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58194.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, Julia. 2008. “Child Maltreatment in Diverse Households: Challenges to Law, Theory, and Practice.” Journal of Law and Society 35 (1): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, John M., and William M. O'Barr. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Cour d'appel de Bruxelles (31e ch.), 01/02/2012.” 2013. Revue trimestrielle de droit familial (2): 603–608.
   Google Scholar
• “Cour d'appel de Mons (ch. Jeun.), 08/06/2011.” 2011. Revue trimestrielle de droit familial (3): 721–729.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Kerry. 1992. “The Fit Between Qualitative Research and Characteristics of Families.” In Qualitative Methods in Family Research, edited by Jane F. Gilgun, Kerry Daly, and Gerald Handel, 3–11. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Doytcheva, Milena. 2011. “Usages français de la notion de diversité: Permanence et actualité d'un débat.” Sociologie 1 (4): 423–438.
   Google Scholar
• Dupret, Baudouin. 1999. “Legal Pluralism, Normative Plurality, and the Arab World.” In Legal Pluralism in the Arab World, edited by Baudouin Dupret, Maurits Berger, and Laila al-Zwaini, 29–40. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Dupret, Baudouin. 2007. “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification.” European Journal of Legal Studies 1 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, John. 1994. “The Interests of the Child and the Child's Wishes: The Role of Dynamic Self-determinism.” In The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston and UNICEF, 42–61. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, David M. 1980. “Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 5 (3): 425–454.
   Google Scholar
• Gallus, N. 2013. “C.C. N° 30/2013, 7 Mars 2013 (question préjudicielle).” Actualités du droit de la famille 2013 (5): 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John. 1986. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18 (24): 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, Virginie. 2009. “La diversité en Europe: Une évidence?” Raisons Politiques 35 (3): 67–85. doi:10.3917/rai.035.0067.
   Google Scholar
• Hiernaux, G. 2013. “Tribunal de la Jeunesse de Bruxelles, 26/05/2011.” Revue trimestrielle de droit familial (4): 1079–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekema, André J., and Wibo van Rossum. 2009. “Empirical Conflict Rules in Dutch Legal Cases of Cultural Diversity.” In Cultural Diversity and the Law: State Responses from around the World, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Jean-François Gaudreault-Desbiens, and Alison Dundes Renteln, 851–88. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, Géraldine, and Anne-Catherine Rasson. 2013. “L'intérêt de l'enfant sur le fil: Réflexions à partir des arrêts de la Cour constitutionnelle en matière de filiation.” Journal des Tribunaux 23 (6525): 425–436.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally E. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Sally Falk. 2005. “Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999.” In Law and Anthropology: A Reader, edited by Sally Falk Moore, 346–367. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Neyrand, Gérard. 2010. “L'enfant comme référentiel ambigu des politiques publiques.” Informations sociales 160 (4): 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nistor v. Romania. Application no. 14565/05 (judgement of 2 November 2010). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101510.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosen, Mai H.. 2006. “In the Name of the Father, the Child and the Holy Genes: Constructions of ‘The Child's Best Interest’ in Legal Disputes over Contact.” Acta Sociologica 49 (1): 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Stephen. 1994. “The Best Interests of the Child – Principles and Problems.” In The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston and UNICEF, 26–41. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringelheim, Julie, ed. 2011a. Le droit et la diversité culturelle. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Ringelheim, Julie, ed. 2011b. “Le droit et la diversité culturelle: Cartographie d'un champ en construction.” In Le droit et la diversité culturelle, edited by Julie Ringelheim, 1–65. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Rubellin-Devichi, Jacqueline. 1994. “The Best Interests Principle in French Law and Practice.” In The Best Interests of the Child: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston and UNICEF, 259–280. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, Peter G., and Jonathan Aleck, eds. 1992. Law and Anthropology. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scozzari and Giuntia v. Italy. Applications no. 39221/98 and no. 41963/98 (judgement of 9 July 2000). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58752.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Prakash. 2005. Legal Pluralism in Conflict: Coping with Cultural Diversity in Law. London: Glass House Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Carol. 1991. “The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody.” Journal of Law and Society 18 (4): 485–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen, Guy. 1994. Rapport Fait Au Nom de La Commission de La Justice. 1430/4–93/94. Belgique: Chambre des Représentants de Belgique. http://www.lachambre.be/doc/flwb/pdf/48/1430/48k1430004.pdf#search=%221430%22.
   Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, B.Z. 2009. “A Framework for Pluralistic Socio-Legal Arenas.” In Cultural Diversity and the Law: State Responses from Around the World, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Jean-François Gaudreault-Desbiens, and Alison D. Renteln, 381–401. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Théry, Irène. 1989. “The Interest of the Child and the Regulation of the Post-divorce Family.” In Child Custody and the Politics of Gender, edited by Carol Smart and Selma Sevenhuijsen, 78–99. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Théry, Irène. 1993. Le Démariage: Justice et Vie Privée. Paris: Editions O. Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• “Tribunal de la jeunesse de Mons, 25/10/2001.” 2002. Revue trimestrielle de droit familial (2): 340.
   Google Scholar
• Truffin, Barbara. 2011. “Enjeux contemporains de la justice de proximité en matière conjugale: Le rôle de la justice de paix dans une société multiculturelle.” In Scènes uit de geschiedenis van het vredegerecht - Scènes de l'histoire de la justice de paix: Verslagboek van de eerste dag van het internationaal colloquium 'de vrederechter in Europa, Gent - Rotterdam = actes de la première journée du colloque international 'le juge de paix en Europe", Gand - Rotterdam, edited by Georges Martyn, 287–308. Bruxelles: die Keure - la Charte.
   Google Scholar
• Truffin, Barbara, and François Laperche. 2011. ““Ils emportent leur secret”: Regards ethnographiques sur le traitement judiciaire des conflits conjugaux en contexte multiculturel.” In Le droit et la diversité culturelle, edited by Julie Ringelheim, 657–698. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• van Drooghenbroeck, Sébastien. 2011. “Les transformations du concept de neutralité de l'état: Quelques réflexions provocatrices.” In Le droit et la diversité culturelle, edited by Julie Ringelheim, 75–120. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gysel, Alain-Charles. 1996. “L'intérêt de l'enfant, pierre de touche ou pierre philosophale pour les tiers intervenants?” Revue de droit de l'ULB 13 (1): 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gysel, Alain-Charles. 2001. “L'intérêt de l'enfant, mythe et réalité.” Actualités du droit familial. Le point en 49 (Octobre 2001): 170–206.
   Google Scholar
• Wyvekens, Anne. 2012. Justice et diversité culturelle: Rapport de recherche. Paris: CERSA.
   Google Scholar