Between panic and hope: Indigenous peoples, gold, violence(s) and FPIC in Colombia, through the lens of time

References

• Anaya, J. 2013. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya: Extractive industries and indigenous peoples,” A/HRC/24/41, July.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, N. 2007. Dos plazas y una nación: raza y colonización en riosucio, Caldas, 1846-1948 [Muddied waters: Race, Region, and local history in Colombia, 1846-1948]. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historía, Universidad de los Andes, Universidad del Rosario.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, E. D., and D. Goldstein. 2010. “Violent Pluralism: Understanding the New Democracies of Latin America.” In Violent Democracies in Latin America, edited by Enrique Desmond Arias, and Daniel Goldstein, 1–34. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auyero, J. 2010. “Clandestine Connections: The Political and Relational Makings of Collective Violence.” In Violent Democracies in Latin America, edited by Enrique Desmond Arias and Daniel Goldstein, 108–133. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becerra, L. A. P. 2013. “Capítulo 3: La conflictividad por le territorio, el control de los RNNR y la renta minera. El choque de las locomotoras mineras en Colombia” [Chapter 3: Conflicts over Territory, control of natural resources and mining rents]. In Minería en Colombia: Institucionalidad y territorio, paradojas y conflictos. (vol 2), 143–192. Bogotá: Contraloría General de la República.
   Google Scholar
• Benda-Beckmann, F. 2002. “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism 47: 37–83.
   Google Scholar
• Civico, A. 2016. The Para-State: An Ethnography of Colombia’s Death Squads. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colchester, M., and F. MacKay. 2004. “Indigenous Peoples, collective representation and the right to free, prior and informed consent,” Paper for the 10th conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Oaxaca. Moreton-in-Marsh, United Kingdom: Forest Peoples Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., and J. L. Comaroff. 2016. The Truth about Crime: Sovereignty, Knowledge, Social Order. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Contraloría General de la Nación. 2017. Comunicado de Prensa No. 167. 19 de ocubre.
   Google Scholar
• Corte Constitucional de Colombia. 2016. Sentencia T-530/16. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-530-16.htm
   Google Scholar
• Defensoría del Pueblo. 2010. “La Minería de hecho en Colombia” [Mining in practice in Colombia]. Bogotá: Defensoría Delegada para los Derechos Colectivos y del Ambiente, diciembre.
   Google Scholar
• Defensoria-SAT. 2018. “Alerta Temprana No 084-18.” diciembre 11.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, C., and J. Cariño. 2013. Making Free, Prior and Informed Consent a Reality: Indigenous Peoples and the Extractive Sector, Indigenous Peoples Links. Middlesex School of Law, Ecumenical Council for Social Responsibility: London.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, C. 2018. Vol. 2 Consulta Previa: un balance internacional y su relación con nuestro bloque de constucionalidad. https://lasillavacia.com/silla-llena/red-etnica/historia/vol-2-consulta-previa-un-balance-internacional-y-su-relacion-con
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2016. “Sentipensar Con la Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y la Dimensión Ontológica de Las Epistemologías Del Sur” [Feel-thinking with the Earth: territorial Struggles and the Ontological Dimension of Southern Epistemologies].” Aibr, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 11 (1): 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Peoples Programme. 2016. Constitutional Court of Colombia Amicus Curiae Brief in Acción de tutela interpuesta por el Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta (Pueblo Embera Chamí) contra la Agencia Nacional de Minería – ANM, la Corporación Autónoma de Caldas – CORPOCALDAS, el Instituto Colombiano de Desarrollo Rural – INCODER y el Ministerio del Interior. February.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E. 2012. “Armed Groups Control Illegal Mines in Half of Colombia,” enero 31, Insight Crime, http://insightcrime.org/insight-latest-news/item/2148-armed-groups-control-illegal-mines-in-half-of-colombia
   Google Scholar
• Frontline, D. 2019. Front Line Defenders Global Analysis 2018. County Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, A. 2005. Los misteres de las minas. Crónica de la Colonia europea más grande de Colombia en el siglo XIX, surgida alrededor de las minas de Marmato, Supía y Riosucio [The misters of the mines: Chronicle of the largest European colony of Colombia in the Nineteenth century, developed around the mines of Marmato]. Manizales: Editorial Universidad de Caldas.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. 2012. Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, D. 1997. “Can the Subaltern Plan? Ethnicity and Development in Cauca, Colombia.” Urban Anthropology 26 (3–4): 243–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, D. 2004. “Desde afuera y desde adentro: La planificación indígena como contra-desarrollo” [From Outside and Inside: Indiegnous Planning as Counter-development]. In Retornando la mirada: una investigación colaborativa interétnica sobre el Cauca a la entrada del milenio [Turning perspectives: interethnic collaborative research about Cauca at the outset of the milennium], edited by Joanne Rappaport. Popayán: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2016. “Links between Gold and Coca in Colombia.” Council on Hemispheric Affairs, August 18, http://www.coha.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Green-Coca_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. 2006. “Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology.” Cultural Anthropology 21 (1): 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., and A. F. Garcia. 2012. Estrategias y Mecanismos de Protección de Pueblos Indígenas Frente a Proyectos Mineros y Energéticos: La Experiencia del Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta [Strategies and Mechanisms for Protecting Indiegnous Peoples affected by Mining and Energy Projects: The Experience of the Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta]. Riosucio and Supía, Caldas: Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta.
   Google Scholar
• Idrobo, N., D. Mejia, and A. M. Tribin. 2013. “Minería ilegal y violencia en Colombia” [Illegal mining and violence in Colombia]. Presentation in the forum “Mineria en Latinoamerica: retos y oportunidades” [Mining in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities],. Bogotà, Universidad Los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Jamasmie, C. 2013a. “lllegal gold mining profits for rebels in Colombia five times larger than cocaine,” June 24. http://www.mining.com/illegal-gold-mining-profits-for-rebels-in-colombia-five-times-larger-than-cocaine-68592/
   Google Scholar
• Jamasmie, C. 2013b. “Illegal mining is Colombia’s new Cocaine,” December. http://www.mining.com/illegal-mining-is-latin-americas-new-cocaine-73332/
   Google Scholar
• Jimeno, G. 2012. Colombia Synthesis Report: From Consultation to Consent. Ottawa: The North-South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kernaghan, R. 2009. Coca’s Gone: Of Might and Right in the Hulluaga Post-boom. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2010. “Experiments in Engaged Anthropology.” Collaborative Anthropologies 3: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2014. Mining Capitalism: The Relationship Between Corporations and Their Critics. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2018. Engaged Anthropology: Politics Beyond the Text. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leifsen, Esben, Maria-Therese Gustafsson, Maria Guzman-Gallegos and Almut Schilling-Vacaflor, (eds.). 2017. “Special Issue: New Mechanisms of Participation in Extractive Governance between Technologies of Governance and Resistance Work.” Third World Quarterly 38 (5): 1043–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre, J. 2009. El Derecho como Conjuro: Fetichismo legal, violencia y movimientos sociales [Law as Spell: Legal fetishism, violence and social movements]. Bogotá: Siglo Hombres Editores, Universidad de los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaitre, J., and K. B. Sandvik. 2015. “Shifting Frames, Vanishing Resources, and Dangerous Political Opportunities: Legal Mobilization among Displaced Women in Colombia.” Law & Society Review 49 (1): 5–38. (pre-published version).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano Suárez, L. 2017. “Participate, Make Visible, Propose: The Wager of Indigenous Women in the Organizational process of the Regional Indigenous Council of Cauca (CRIC).” In Demanding Justice and Security: Indigenous Women and Legal Plurality in Latin America, edited by Rachel Sieder. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, M., D. López Matta, M. M. Campo, A. Escobar, and V. Weitzner. 2017. “Weaving Hope in Ancestral Black Territories in Colombia: the Reach and Limitations of Free, Prior, and Informed Consultation and Consent.” Third World Quarterly 38 (5): 1075–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé, F., and J. Camargo. 2012. “Actores ilegales y Sector Extractivo en Colombia” [Illegal Actors and the Extractive Sector in Colombia]. CITpax Colombia and Observatorio Internacional, DDR-Ley de Justicia y Paz.
   Google Scholar
• Massé, F., and J. Munevar. 2016. Due Diligence in Colombia’s Gold Supply Chain. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U., and L. Nader. 2008. Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2012. “Theory from the Antipodes: Notes on Jean & John Comaroffs’ TFS.” Fieldsights - Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology Online February.
   Google Scholar
• Molano, A. 2001. “La justicia guerillera” [Guerilla Justice]. In El Caleidoscopio de las justicias en Colombia: Tomo II [the Caleidoscope of Justices in Colombia: Volume II], edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Mauricio Garcia Villegas, 331–388. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre.
   Google Scholar
• Motoc, A.-J. and Tebtebba Foundation. 2005. “Standard-Setting: Legal Commentary on the concept of free, prior and informed consent,” E/CN.4/Sub.2/AC.4/2005/2. 21, June.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. 2013. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PAC, RICL & FPP (Palenke Alto Cauca, Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta and Forest Peoples Programme). 2015. “Diálogos Interculturales sobre la minería en Colombia,”. Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo L (RICL). 2009. Plan de Vida: Fases de Autorreconocimiento y Avance de Formulación [Life Plan: Phases of Self-Recognition and Advances in Formulation]. Riosucio and Supía, Caldas.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, G. A. 2014. De la Consulta Previa al Consentimiento, Previo, Libre e Informado a Pueblos Indigenas en Colombia [From Prior Consultation to Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples in Colombia]. Bogota: Universidad del Rosario.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Garavito, C. 2011. “Ethnicity.gov: Global Governance, Indigenous Peoples, and the Rights to Prior Consultation in Social Minefields.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18 (1). Article 12.
   Google Scholar
• Salim, E. 2003. Striking a Better Balance: The World Bank Group and Extractive Industries. The Final report of the Extractive Industries Review, December.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Empancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S., and C. Rodríguez-Garavito. 2005. “Law, Politics, and the Subaltern in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization”, In Law and Globalization from below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. en Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Cesar Rodriguez Garavito (eds.), Cambrige, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. 2013. Oro y crimen: minería illegal [Gold and crime: illegal mining]. 29 March. (www.semana.com).
   Google Scholar
• Sieder, R. 2011. “Contested Sovereignties: Indigenous Law, violence and State Effects in Postwar Guatemala.” Critique of Anthropology 31 (3): 161–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed, S. 2006. “At the Crossroads of Human Rights and Anthropology: Toward a Critically Engaged Activist Research.” American Anthropologist 108 (1): 66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. (ed.). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szablowski, D. 2018. “Reading Indigenous Legality in Mining Conflicts.” Paper presented at the International Commission for Legal Pluralism Conference, August 22–24, University of Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, M. 2003. Law in a Lawless Land: Diary of a Limpieza in Colombia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., and R. B. Galemba. 2013. “Illegal Anthropology: An Introduction.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 36 (2): 211–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2018. United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders Michel Forst Visit to Colombia, 20 November to 3 December 2018 End of mission statement.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner, V. 2002. Through Indigenous Eyes: Toward Appropriate Decision-Making Processes regarding Mining on or near Ancestral Lands. Ottawa: The North-South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner, V. 2011. Tipping the Power Balance—Making FPIC Work. Lessons and Policy Directions from 10 Years of Action Research on Extractives with Indigenous and Afro-Descendant Peoples in the Americas. Ottawa: The North-South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner, V. 2012. Holding Extractive Companies to account in Colombia: An evaluation of CSR instruments through the lens of Indigenous and Afro-Descendent Rights. Ottawa, Resguardo Indígena Cañamomo Lomaprieta, Proceso de Comunidades Negras, The North-South Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner, V. 2017. “Nosotros Somos Estado”: Contested Legalities in Decision-making about Extractives Affecting Ancestral Territories in Colombia.” Third World Quarterly 38 (5): 1198–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzner, V. 2018. Economía Cruda/Derecho Crudo: Pueblos Ancestrales, Minería, Derecho y Violencia en Colombia [Raw Economy/Raw Law: Ancestral Peoples, Mining, Law and Violence in Colombia], PhD diss., Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS-CDMX), Mexico.
   Google Scholar