Locating the subject of REDD+: between “improving” and safeguarding forest inhabitants’ conduct

References

• Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A., ed. 2018. Transforming REDD+: Lessons and New Directions. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Astuti, R., and A. McGregor. 2015a. “Responding to the Green Economy: How REDD+ and the One Map Initiative Are Transforming Forest Governance in Indonesia.” Third World Quarterly 36 (12): 2273–2293. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1082422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astuti, R., and A. McGregor. 2015b. “Governing Carbon, Transforming Forest Politics: A Case Study of Indonesia’s REDD+ Task Force.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1111/apv.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, H. 2017. “Welfare Environmentality and REDD+ Incentives in Indonesia.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (6): 795–809. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1292872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, H. 2020a. “The Biopolitics of Carbon Accounting in Indonesia’s Forests.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (1): 174–192. doi:10.1177/2399654419852970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, H. 2020b. “Power, REDD+ and Reforming Forest Governance in Indonesia.” Third World Quarterly 41 (5): 783–800. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1703178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAN. 2009. Views on Issues Relating to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities for the Development and Application of Methodologies. February 15. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/098.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• COICA. 2009. SBSTA Submission De La Coordinadora De Las Organizaciones Indigenas De La Cuenca Amazonica – COICA. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Y. A. 2019. “Colonial Residue: REDD+, Territorialisation and the Racialized Subject in Guyana and Suriname.” Geoforum 106: 38–47. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Y. A. 2020. “How REDD+ Governs: Multiple Forest Environmentalities in Guyana and Suriname.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2): 323–345. doi:10.1177/2514848619860748.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., C. Hunsberger, and C. Vaddhanaphuti. 2017. “Climate Change Policies, Land Grabbing and Conflict: Perspectives from Southeast Asia.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 38 (3): 297–304. doi:10.1080/02255189.2017.1343413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., and K. Brock. 2005. “What Do Buzzwords Do for Development Policy? A Critical Look at 'Participation', 'Empowerment' and 'Poverty Reduction.” Third World Quarterly 26 (7): 1043–1060. doi:10.1080/01436590500235603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2009. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• ECA. 2009. Response to Calls for Submissions on the UNFCCC Processes. February 5. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/101.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2010. “Neoliberal Environmentality: Towards a Poststructuralist Political Ecology of the Conservation Debate.” Conservation and Society 8 (3): 171–181. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.73806.
   Google Scholar
• FONAFIFO (National Forestry Financing Fund of Costa Rica), CONAFOR (National Forestry Commission of Mexico), and Ministry of Environment, Ecuador. 2012. Lessons Learned for REDD+ from PES and Conservation Incentive Programs: Examples from Costa Rica, Mexico, and Ecuador. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1984. “On the Genealogy of Ethics.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow, 340–372. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991a. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991b. “Questions of Method.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 73–86. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. Edited by M. Senellart and translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. Edited by M. Senellart and translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• GOFC-GOLD . 2016. Sourcebook: COP 22 Version 1. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., E. Lövbrand, E. Turnhout, and M. J. Vijge. 2012. “In Pursuit of Carbon Accountability: The Politics of REDD+ Measuring, Reporting and Verification Systems.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (6): 726–731. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N., T. Munroe, L. Goldman, C. Slay, and F. Follet. 2020. “Agriculture Drove Recent Record-breaking Tree Cover Loss.” Global Forest Watch, February 21. https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/agriculture-drove-recent-record-breaking-tree-cover-loss.
   Google Scholar
• Hjort, M. 2020. “Who Should Be Governed to Reduce Deforestation and How? Multiple Governmentalities at the REDD+ Negotiations.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (1): 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort, M. 2015. “Governing Deforestation: A Governmentality Analysis of Tropical Forests in Climate Negotiations.” PhD diss., University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, P. 2018. “Slippery Violence in the REDD+ Forests of Central Kalimantan.” Conservation and Society 16 (2): 136–146. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_16_150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGES. 2012. Community Carbon Accounting Action Research Project – Vietnam: Activity Report FY2012. https://archive.iges.or.jp/files/research/natural-resource/forest/pdf/cca/fy2012/summary_vietnam_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IGES. 2020. Community Carbon Accounting Action Research Project. https://archive.iges.or.jp/en/natural-resource/forest/activity_cca.html.
   Google Scholar
• IIPFCC. 2009. Submission to SBSTA on Item 11 of FCCC/SBSTA/2008/L.23. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/108.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ITC. 2009. Forest Biomass Assessment in Support of REDD by Indigenous People and Local Communities. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/109.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IWGIA, Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact, Forests of the World, IBIS, CARE-Denmark, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, and Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. 2014. Submission on Non-Carbon Benefits as an Imperative for the Sustainability of REDD+. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/smsn/ngo/408.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2014. “Fixing Non-Market Subjects: Governing Land and Population in the Global South.” Foucault Studies 18: 34–48. doi:10.22439/fs.v0i18.4650.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and N. Rose. 1990. “Governing Economic Life.” Economy and Society 19 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1080/03085149000000001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, S., S. Mahanty, P. To, W. Dressler, P. Kanowski, and M. Thavat. 2018. “Learning from ’Actually Existing’ REDD+: A Synthesis of Ethnographic Findings.” Conservation and Society 17 (1): 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, India. 2018. National REDD+ Strategy India. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., and J. Stripple. 2010. “My Space: Governing Individuals’ Carbon Emissions.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (2): 341–362. doi:10.1068/d4109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REDD+ Safeguards Working Group, Accra Caucus, and Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus. 2014. Methodological Issues Related to Non-carbon Benefits Resulting from the Implementation of REDD+ Activities. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/smsn/ngo/409.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematic of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205. doi:10.2307/591464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. 2007. “Green Governmentality: Insights and Opportunities in the Study of Nature’s Rule.” Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 291–307. doi:10.1177/0309132507077080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonet, G., A. Agrawal, F. Bénédet, M. Cromberg, C. de Perthuis, D. Haggard, N. Jansen, et al. 2018. ID-RECCO, International Database on REDD+ projects, Linking Economic, Carbon and Communities Data. Version 3.0. http://www.reddprojectsdatabase.org.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, B. 2012. “Bringing Discourse to the Market: The Commodification of Avoided Deforestation.” Environmental Politics 21 (4): 621–639. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.688357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, B. 2013. “Not Seeing the Forest for the Carbon in the Trees? The Role of Fighting Tropical Deforestation in Global Climate Governance.” PhD diss., Hamburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2006. Review on the Economics of Climate Change. London: H.M. Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• TVE/UN-REDD. 2009. REDD as Part of the Solution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYHldt9gfMw.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2005. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2007. Views on the Range of Topics and Other Relevant Information Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009a. Issues Relating to Indigenous People and Local Communities for the Development and Application of Methodologies. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009b. Issues Relating to Indigenous People and Local Communities for the Development and Application of Methodologies. Submissions from Parties. Addendum. FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1/Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009c. Information on Experiences and Views on Needs for Technical and Institutional Capacity-Building and Cooperation. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.2. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009d. Information on Experiences and Views on Needs for Technical and Institutional Capacity-Building and Cooperation. Submissions from Parties. Addendum. FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.2/Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009e. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Fifteenth Session, Held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009f. Issues Relating to Indigenous People and Local Communities for the Development and Application of Methodologies. Submissions from Parties. Addendum. FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1/Add.2. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2009g. Ideas and Proposals on the Elements Contained in Paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties. Addendum. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/MISC.4/Add.2. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2010. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Addendum. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2014a. Views on the Issues Referred to in Decision 1/CP.18, Paragraph 40. Submissions from Parties and Admitted Observer Organizations. FCCC/SBSTA/2014/MISC4. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2014b. Views on Types of Information from Systems for Providing Information on How the Safeguards Are Being Addressed and Respected and That May Be Provided by Developing Country Parties. Submissions from Parties and Admitted Observer Organizations. FCCC/SBSTA/2014/MISC.7. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2014c. Views on the Issues Referred to in Decision 1/CP.18, Paragraph 40. Submissions from Parties and Admitted Observer Organizations. Addendum. FCCC/SBSTA/2014/MISC4/ADD1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2015a. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Proposal by the President. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2015b. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-First Session, Held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.3. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD. 2011. REDD+ and a Green Economy: Opportunities for a Mutually Supportive Relationship. Geneva: United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation.
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2010. “An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services.” Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1245–1252. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisse, M., and L. Goldman. 2018. “2017 was the Second-worst Year on Record for Tropical Tree Cover Loss.” Global Forest Watch, June 27. https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/2017-was-the-second-worst-year-on-record-for-tropical-tree-cover-loss.
   Google Scholar