Public technology: nuclear energy in Europe

References

• Adam, B., U. Beck, and J. Van Loon. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: SAGE, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Alder, K. “Focus Thick Things. Introduction.” Isis 98, no. 1 (2007): 80–83. doi:10.1086/512832.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., K. Burningham, G. Walker, and N. Cass. “Imagined Publics and Engagement around Renewable Energy Technologies in the UK.” Public Understanding of Science 21, no. 1 (2012): 36–50. doi:10.1177/0963662510365663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, C. A., ed. Whither Mankind. A Panorama of Modern Civilization. New York: Longmans & Co, 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Belgum, K. Popularizing the Nation. Audience, Representation, and the Production of Identity in Die Gartenlaube, 1853–1900. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Belot, R. Aux origines de la technoscience française. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. The Arcades Project; translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin; prepared on the basis of the German volume: ed. by, R. Tiedemann. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, C. D. Science Service and the Origins of Science Journalism, 1919–1950. Ph thesis. Iowa State University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B. “A Historical Perspective on Science and Its’ Others.” Isis 100 (2009): 359–368. doi:10.1086/599547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B., and C. Blondel. Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B., S. Loeve, A. Nordmann, and A. Schwarz. “Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience.” Journal of General Philosophy of Science 42 (2011): 365–383. doi:10.1007/s10838-011-9172-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, S. S. Immunization: How Vaccines Became Controversial. London: Reaktion Books, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, T. M. “The Smoke Menace: Cinema, Sponsorship, and the Social Relations of Science in 1937.” In Science and Nature, edited by M. Shortland, 57–88. Oxford: British Society for the History of Science, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, no. 3–4 (2006): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, P. J. Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Reiner, eds. Joseph Rotblat: Visionary for Peace. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Brian, P. Nuclear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction. 1895–1984. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, H. (chair). Science Growth and Society: A New Perspective. Report of the Secretary-General’s Ad Hoc Group on New Concepts of Science Policy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. Keeper of Nuclear Conscience. The Life and Work of Joseph Rotblat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bud, R. Penicillin: Triumph and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bud, R. “Science, Brands and the Museum.” JCOM – the Journal of Science Communication (2016 December 16). doi:10.22323/2.15060303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bud, R. “Museums Theme – Adventures in Museology: Category Building over a Century, and the Context for Experiments in Reinvigorating the Science Museum at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century.” Science Museum Group Journal ( Autumn 2017). doi:10.15180/170809.
   Google Scholar
• Bud, R., P. Greenhalgh, F. James, and M. Shiach, eds. Being Modern: The Impact of Science on Culture in the Early Twentieth Century. London: UCL Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Budia, S., and N. Jas. “Risk and Risk Society in Historical Perspective.” History and Technology 23 (2007): 317–331. doi:10.1080/07341510701527393.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. C. Accident Prone. A History of Technology, Psychology, and Misfits of the Machine Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., J. Barnett, A. Carr, R. Clift, and W. Wehrmeyer. “Industrial Constructions of Publics and Public Knowledge: A Qualitative Investigation of Practice in the UK Chemicals Industry.” Public Understanding of Science 16, no. 1 (2007): 23–43. doi:10.1177/0963662506071285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. Translated by Graham Burchell. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and D. F. J. Campbell. “‘Mode 3‘ and ‘Quadruple Helix‘: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46, no. 3/4 (2009): 201–223. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., D. F. J. Campbell, and S. S. Rehman. “Mode 3 Knowledge Production. Systems and Systems Theory, Clusters and Networks.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 5, no.17 (2016): 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, C. Heisenberg in the Atomic Age: Science and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ceadel, M. “Popular Fiction and the Next War, 1918–1939.” In Class. Culture and Social Change: A New View of the 1930s, edited by F. Gloversmith, 161–184. Sussex: Harvester Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., and F. Trentmann. “Disruption in and across Time.” In Infrastructures in Practice: The Evolution of Demand in Networked Societies, edited by E. Shove and F. Trentmann, 299–317. London: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. W., S. Schaffer, and J. Golinski. The Sciences in Enlightened Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. “‘Against God-Inspired Conscience’: The Perception of Gas Warfare as a Weapon of Mass Destruction, 1915–1939.” War & Society 18, no. 1 (2000): 47–69. doi:10.1179/072924700791201379.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R., and S. Pumfrey. “Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture.” History of Science 32 (1994): 237–267. doi:10.1177/007327539403200301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. “A Place for Stories: Nature, History, and Narrative.” The Journal of American History 78, no. 4 (1992): 1347–1376. doi:10.2307/2079346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierkes, M., and C. von Grote, eds. Between Understanding and Trust the Public, Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Diogo, M.-P., and V. L. Dirk. Europeans Globalizing – Mapping, Exploiting, Exchanging. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, A. “The Natural Defense of a Scientific People: The Public Debate over Chemical Warfare in Post-WWI America.” Bulletin for the History of Chemistry 27, no. 2 (2002): 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, A. “Abraham Cressy Morrison in the Agora: Bringing Chemistry to the Public.” In The Public Image of Chemistry, edited by J. Schummer, B. Bensaude-Vincent, and B. van Tiggelen, 187–212. Singapore: World Scientific, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, D. The Shock of the Old. Technology and Global History since 1900. London: Profile Books, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach, K. “Ikonen in der Geschichte der technisch-apparativen Massenmedien. Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten medienhistorischer Ikonisierungsprozesse.” In Randgänge der Mediengeschichte, edited by M. Buck, F. Hartling, and S. Pfau, 59–75. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, S., and C. Sachse, eds. Kernforschung in Österreich. Wandlungen Eines Interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes 1900–1978. Vienna: Böhlau, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Forgan, S. “Atoms in Wonderland.” History and Technology 19 (2003): 177–196. doi:10.1080/0734151032000123936.
   Google Scholar
• Forstner, C. “Austria. Short Country Report.” 2017.Accessed March 6, 2018. http://honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/AU.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fraunholz, U., T. Hänseroth, and A. Woschech. “Hochmoderne Visionen und Utopien. Zur Transzendenz technisierter Fortschrittserwartungen.” In Technology Fiction. Technische Visionen Und Utopien in Der Hochmoderne, edited by F. Uwe and A. Woschech, 11–24. Bielefeld: transcript, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. Things to Come. London: British Film Institute, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. ““The New Behemoth”. Essay Review of Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, by Michel Callon, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. Translated by Graham Burchell.” Contemporary Sociology 39 (2010): 533–536. doi:10.1177/0094306110380382a.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, A. “Wunder der Technik, Wunder der Natur. Zur Vermittlungsleistung eines medialen Topos.” In Wunder – Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by C. T. G. Alexander and T. Kössler, 270–301. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1989): 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. C. T. “European Astrofuturism, Cosmic Provincialism: Historicizing the Space Age.” In Imagining Outer Space: European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century, edited by Geppert, A. C. T., 3–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012a.
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. C. T. “Rethinking the Space Age: Astroculture and Technoscience.” History and Technology 28 (2012b): 219–223. doi:10.1080/07341512.2012.722789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., S. Schwartzman., M. Trow., P. Scott., and H. Nowotny. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Researc. London: Sage, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, M. A Strange and Formidable Weapon: British Responses to World War I Poison Gas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Golinski, J. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, P. Ephemeral Vistas: A History of the Expositions Universelles, Great Exhibitions and World’s Fairs, 1851–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, P. The Modern Ideal: The Rise and Collapse of Idealism in the Visual Arts from the Enlightenment to Postmodernism. London: V&A Publications, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. “The Price of Trust — A Response to Weingart and Guenther.” JCOM – the Journal of Science Communication (2016 November 9). doi:10.22323/2.15060401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenberg, B. C. Science and the Public Mind. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. “Energy Futures: Diversity and the Need for Assessment.” Futures 43 (2011): 820–830. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. “Techno-Visionary Sciences: Challenges to Policy Advice.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9, no. 2 (2013): 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit.Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, O. “Die Nutzbarmachung der Energie der Atomkerne.” Abhandlungen und Berichte des Deutschen Museums 18, no. 2 (1950): 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. “Der Erfinder als Erlöser. Führerfiguren im völkischen Zukunftsroman.” In Utopie, Antiutopie und Science Fiction: Im deutschsprachigen Roman des 20. Jahrhunderts, edited by H. Esselborn, 29–47. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, K. Ham Radio’s Technical Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N. Cultural Excursions: Marketing Appetites and Cultural Tastes in Modern America. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. “Nuclear Ontologies.” Constellations 13 (2006): 320–331. doi:10.1111/cons.2006.13.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, M. Dr. Strangelove’s America: Society and Culture in the Atomic Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, U. “Europe in High Modernity. Reflections on a Theory of the 20th Century.” Journal of Modern European History 5 (2007): 5–21. doi:10.17104/1611-8944_2007_1_5.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, P. Titanic Century: Media, Myth, and the Making of a Cultural Icon. Santa Barbara: Praeger Publishers, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hochadel, O. “A Shock to the Public. Itinerant Lecturers and Instrument Makers as Practitioners of Electricity in the German Enlightenment (1740–1800).” Nuova Voltiana. Studies on Volta and His Times 5 (2003a): 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hochadel, O. Öffentliche Wissenschaft. Elektrizität in der deutschen Aufklärung. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2003b.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P., A. Hommels, A. Kaijser, and E. van der Vleuten, eds. The Making of Europe’s Critical Infrastructur. Common Connections and Shared Vulnerabilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P., A. Kaijser, and V. D. V. Erik. Europe’s Infrastructure Transition: Economy, War, Nature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., and A. Prades. “On Interpretative Risk Perception Research: Some Reflections on Its Origins, Its Nature, and Its Possible Applications in Risk Communication Practice.” Health, Risk & Society 11, no. 5 (2009): 409–430. doi:10.1080/13698570903180448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. “Risk, Technology, and Modernity: Re-Posititioning the Sociological Analysis of Nuclear Power.” In The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, edited by B. Adam, U. Beck, and J. Van Loon, 87–94. London: SAGE, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and M. Horst. “Communicating Trust and Trusting Science Communication ― Some Critical Remarks.” JCOM – the Journal of Science Communication 15, no. 6 (2016). Accessed March 5, 2018. https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1506_2016_L01.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, 1–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jolivette, C., ed. British Art in the Nuclear Age. Burlington: Ashgate, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. Mobilizing against Nuclear Energy. A Comparison of Germany and the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A. “Redirecting Power: Swedish Nuclear Power Policies in Historical Perspective.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 17 (1992): 437–462. doi:10.1146/annurev.eg.17.110192.002253.
   Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A. Sweden. Short Country Report. 2017. Accessed March 6, 2018. http://honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/SW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, D. “The Atomic Secret.” Representations 90, no. 1, May 1 (2005): 28–60. doi:10.1525/rep.2005.90.1.28.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, D. “History: From Blackboards to Bombs.” Nature News 523, no. 7562, July 30 (2015): 523–525. doi:10.1038/523523a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, W., and J. Shot. Writing the Rules for Europe: Experts, Cartels, and International Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmbach, K. “Revisiting the Nuclear Age. State of the Art Research in Nuclear History.” Neue politische Literatur 62 (2017): 49–68. doi:10.3726/4926NPL-2017-1_49.
   Google Scholar
• Kargon, R. K., K. Fiss., M. Low., and A. P. Molella, eds. World’s Fairs on the Eve of War: Science Technology & Modernity, 1937–1942. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, M. C. K., ed. Radio Cultures. The Sound Medium in American Life. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, A. M. “Spanning the Globe: Australian Protest against Uranium Mining and Their West-German Supporters.” Historical Social Research 39 (2014): 254–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, A. M., and J.-H. Meyer, eds.. “Global Protest against Nuclear Power. Transfer and Transnational Exchange in the 1970s and 1980s.” Historical Social Research 39, no. 1 (2014): 165–190, special issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittler, F. A. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R., and T. Pinch. “Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States.” Technology and Culture 37 (1996): 763–795. doi:10.2307/3107097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerner, S. “The British Motor-Cycle Industry during the 1930s.” The Journal of Transport History 16, no. 1 (1995): 55–76. doi:10.1177/002252669501600106.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlrausch, M., and H. Trischler. Building Europe on Expertise: Innovators, Organizers, Networkers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Königsberger, K. “Vernetztes System” ? Die Geschichte des Deutschen Museums 1945–1980 dargestellt an den Abteilungen Chemie und Kernphysik. München: Utz, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, J. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, J. “Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism, and Scientific Intelligence.” Osiris 21 (2006b): 161–181. doi:10.1086/507140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krige, J. “Building the Arsenal of Knowledge.” Centaurus 52 (2010): 280–296. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2010.00195.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznick, P. J. “Losing the World of Tomorrow: The Battle over the Presentation of Science at the 1939 New York World’s Fair.” American Quarterly 46, no. 3 (1994): 341–373. doi:10.2307/2713269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, M. C., H. Ian, and O. Timothy. “Public Reactions to Risk: Social Structures, Images of Science, and the Role of Trust.” In Risk Communication and Public Health, edited by Peter Bennett and Kenneth Calman 3–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and P. Weibel, eds. Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Laucht, C. “Atoms for the People: The Atomic Scientists’ Association, the British State and Nuclear Education in the Atom Train Exhibition, 1947–1948.” British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2012): 591–608. doi:10.1017/S0007087412001070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lente, D. V. L., ed. The Nuclear Age in Popular Media. A Transnational History, 1945–1965. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lente, D. V. L., ed. Camera Atomica. London: Black Dog Publishing, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lente, H. V. “Navigating Foresight in a Sea of Expectations: Lessons from the Sociology of Expectations.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24, no. 8 (2012b): 769–782. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.715478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepick, O. La Grande Guerre Chimique 1914–1918. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Limmer, A. Umwelt im Roman. Ökologisches Bewusstsein und Literatur im Zeitalter der Industrialisierung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, R. Protest der Physiker. Die “Göttinger Erklärung“ von 1957. Bielefeld: transcript, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Maranta, Alessandro, M. Guggenheim, P. Gisler, and C. Pohl. “The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person.” Acta sociologica 46, no. 2 (2003): 150–165. doi:10.1177/0001699303046002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, A. S., and W. D. Karl, eds. Fear of Science-Trust in Science, Conditions for Change in the Climate of Opinion. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain Publishers, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, P. The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mechling, E.W., and J. Mechling, "The Atom According to Disney." In Quarterly Journal of Speech 81, no. 4 (1995): 463–453. doi:10.1080/00335639509384128.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, A. J., and R. L. Merritt. Public Opinion in Semisovereign Germany. The HICOG Surveys, 1949–1955. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.-H. “Challenging the Atomic Community. The European Environmental Bureau and the Europeanization of Anti-Nuclear Protest.” In Societal Actors and European Integration. Polity-Building and Policy-Making 1958–1992, edited by W. Kaiser and J.-H. Meyer, 197–220. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.-H. Denmark. Short Country Report. 2017. Accessed March 5, 2018. http://honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/DK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milder, S. “Thinking Globally, Acting (Trans-)Locally: Petra Kelly and the Transnational Roots of West German Green Politics.” Central European History 43 (2010): 301–326. doi:10.1017/S000893891000004X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mody, C. The Long Arm of Moore’s Law: Microelectronics and American Science. Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, J., and A. Thackray. Gentlemen of Science. Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Möser, K. “The Driver in the Machine: Changing Interiors of the Car.” In Tackling Transport, edited by H. Trischler and S. Zeilinger, 61–82. London: Science Museum, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, S. “The Atom Smashers: Fiction’s Prophetic Parallel to Fact.” Fantasy Fiction Field 210 (1945 October 6): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, M. J. “Weimar Culture and Futuristic Technology: The Rocketry and Spaceflight Fad in Germany, 1923–1933.” Technology and Culture 31 (1990): 725–752. doi:10.2307/3105905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, N., and H. Knudsen. “The Troublesome Life of Peaceful Atoms in Denmark.” History and Technology 26 (2010): 91–118. doi:10.1080/07341511003750022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto-Galan, A. Science in the Public Sphere: A History of Lay Knowledge and Expertise. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. “Visioneering Assessment. On the Construction of Tunnel Visions for Technovisionary Research and Policy.” Technology & Innovation Studies 9, no. 2 (2013): 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. “Science Vs. Technoscience. A Primer.” Accessed January, 2019. https://www.philosophie.tu-darmstadt.de/media/philosophie___goto/text_1/Primer_Science-Technoscience.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. C. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brian, J. Atomic Postcards. Radioactive Messages from the Cold War. Bristol: Intellect, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, S. The Car and British Society: Class, Gender and Motoring, 1896–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, Ruth., M. Emanuel, Adri A. Albert de la Bruheze, and F. Veraart. Cycling Cities: The European Experience. Hundred Years of Policy and Practice. Eindhoven and Munich: Foundation for the History of Technology and Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R. “Whose Modernism, Whose Speed? Designing Mobility for the Future, 1880s–1945.” In Being Modern: The Impact of Science on Culture in the Early Twentieth Century, edited by Robert Bud, Paul Greenhalgh, Frank James and Morag Shiach, 275–289. London: UCL Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R., and A. A. de la Bruhèze. “Contested Spaces: Bicycle Lanes in Urban Europe, 1900–1995.” Transfers 8 (2011): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R., and M. Hård. Consumers, Tinkerers, Rebels. The People Who Shaped Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Onghena, S. “The Survival of 19th-Century Scientific Optimism: The Public Discourse on Science in Belgium in the Aftermath of the Great War (Ca. 1919–1930).” Centaurus 53 (2011): 280–305. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2011.00239.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K. A., N. F. Pidgeon, K. L. Henwood, P. Simmons, and D. Venables. “From the Familiar to the Extraordinary: Local Residents’ Perceptions of Risk When Living with Nuclear Power in the UK.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35, no. 1 (2010): 39–58. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. Acolytes of Nature: Defining Natural Science in Germany, 1770–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Press Schwartz, R. The Making of the History of the Atomic Bomb: Henry Dewolf Smyth and the Historiography of the Manhattan Project. PhD thesis, Princeton University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Radkau, J. Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft 1945–1975. Verdrängte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontroverse. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, A. “Reinterpreting ‘Luddism’: Resistance to New Technology in the British.” In Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology, edited by M. Bauer, 57–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Rhees, D. J. “Corporate Advertising, Public Relations and Popular Exhibits: The Case of Du Pont.” History and Technology 10 (1993): 67–75. doi:10.1080/07341519308581836.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. “Things to Come and Science Fiction in the 1930s.” In British Science Fiction Cinema, edited by I. Q. Hunter, 16–33. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, B. Technology and the Culture of Modernity in Britain and Germany, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, B. The People’s Car. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rödder, S., M. Franzen, and P. Weingart, eds. The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and Its Repercussions. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, K., and B. Wynne. “Technoscience, Imagined Publics and Public Imaginations.” Public Understanding of Science 26, no. 2 (2017): 133–147. doi:10.1177/0963662516663057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rough, E. “Policy Learning through Public Inquiries? the Case of UK Nuclear Energy Policy 1955–61.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (2011): 24–45. doi:10.1068/c09184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusinek, B.-A. Das Forschungszentrum. Eine Geschichte der KFA Jülich von ihrer Gründung bis 1980. Frankfurt a.M and New York: Campus, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A., and L. Vinsel. “Let’s Get Excited about Maintenance.” New York Times, July 23, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. A. “Picturing the Imperator: Passenger Shipping as Art and National Symbol in the German Empire.” Central European History 44 (2011): 227–256. doi:10.1017/S0008938911000021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraiva, T. Fascist Pigs. Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzberg, E. Technology. Critical History of a Concept. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schirrmacher, A. “Kosmos, Koralle und Kultur-Milieu. Zur Bedeutung der populären Wissenschaftsvermittlung im späten Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 31 (2008): 353–371. doi:10.1002/bewi.v31:4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schirrmacher, A. “Popular Science as Cultural Dispositif. On the German Way of Science Communication in the 20th Century.” Science in Context 26 (2013): 473–508. doi:10.1017/S026988971300015X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder-Gudehus, B., and D. Cloutier. “Popularizing Science and Technology during the Cold War: Brussels 1958.” In Fair Representations. World’s Fairs and the Modern World, edited by R. W. Rydell and N. Gwinn, 157–180. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H., and F. Trentmann. “The Material Politics of Energy Disruption: Managing Shortages Amidst Rising Expectations, Britain 1930s–60s.” In Money and Markets: Essays in Honour of Martin Daunton, edited by D. C. Needham. Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, T. “The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2002): 599–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, A. A. The Red Rockets’ Glare: Spaceflight and the Russian Imagination, 1857 –1957. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. M. “Publics in the Pipeline: On Bioenergy and Its Imagined Publics in Norway and Sweden.” In Past and Present Energy Societies. How Energy Connects Politics, Technologies and Cultures, edited by N. Möllers and K. Zachmann, 204–277. Bielefeld: transcript, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Smil, V. Creating the Twentieth Century. Technical Innovations of 1867–1914 and Their Lasting Impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Staudenmaier, J. M. Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., S. J. Lock, and J. Wilsdon. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23, no. 1 (2014): 4–15. doi:10.1177/0963662512450990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syon, G. D. Zeppelin! Germany and the Airship, 1900–1939. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Thackray, Arnold, J.L. Sturchio, P. T. Carroll, and R. F. Bud. Chemistry in America, 1876 –1976: Historical Indicators. Dordrecht and Lancaster: Reidel, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsheim, P. Inventing Pollution: Coal, Smoke, and Culture in Britain since 1800. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J., N. Pidgeon., A. Weyman., and T. Horlick-Jones. “Critical Trust: Understanding Lay Perceptions of Health and Safety Risk Regulation.” Health, Risk & Society 6, no. 2 (2004): 133–150. doi:10.1080/1369857042000219788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weart, S. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit. Essays zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft, Medien und Öffentlichkeit. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., and L. Guenther. “Science Communication and the Issue of Trust.” JCOM – the Journal of Science Communication (2016 September 21). doi:10.22323/2.15050301.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, I. “Anti-Nuclear Movements: Failed Projects or Heralds of a Direct Action Milieu?” Sociological Research Online 6, no. 3 (2001). doi:10.5153/sro.642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, I., and B. Wynne. “Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats.” Science as Culture 22 (2013): 540–566. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.764072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisnioski, M. Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar