Ideological Warriors and Constituent Servants: Understanding the Determinants of Participation on Health Care Legislation in the Polarized Senate

REFERENCES

• Arceneaux, Kevin, and DavidW. Nickerson. 2009. “Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods.” Political Analysis 17(2): 177–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atlas, Cary, Robert Hendershott, and Marty Zupan. 1997. “Optimal Effort Allocation by U.S. Senators: The Role of Constituency Size.” Public Choice 92: 221–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, SarahA., and Steven Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Quarterly. 1997. “Bill Makes Health Insurance `Portable’.” CQ Almanac 1996, 52nd ed., 6-28-6-39. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. “Big Medicare, Medicaid Changes Enacted in Budget Bills,” CQ Almanac 1997, 53rd ed., 6–3–6–12. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1999. “Lawmakers Agree on Need for Changes in Managed Care—But Only in Principle,” 54th ed., 14–3–14–15. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, . 1999.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. “No Accord on Patients’ Rights Bill,” 58th ed., 10–7–10–8. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, . 2003.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. “Medicare Revamp Cuts It Close,” 59th ed., 11–3–11–8. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, . 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Record. 2009a. 111th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 155, no. 178.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2009b. 111th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 155, no. 183.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. 111th Cong., 2nd sess., vol. 156, no. 47.
   Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, Chris, and NathanW. Monroe. 2011. Agenda Setting in the U.S. Senate: Costly Consideration and Majority Party Advantage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, PatrickJ. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C.Lawrence. 1991. Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Behavior in the U.S. Senate. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, LawrenceR., and Theda Skocpol. 2010. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary. 1989. “Variance Specification in Event Count Models: From Restrictive Assumptions to a Generalized Estimator.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 762–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, JohnW. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroger, Gregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 225–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, FrancisE. 1998. “Representation and Public Policy: The Consequences of Senate Apportionment for the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” Journal of Politics 60: 34–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008a. “Agreeing to Disagree: Agenda Content and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33: 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008b. “Dividers, Not Uniters: Presidential Leadership and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004. Journal of Politics 70: 914–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ——— 2012. “Individual and Partisan Activism on the Senate Floor,” In The U.S. Senate: From Deliberation to Dysfunction, ed. BurdettA. Loomis. Washington, DC: CQ Press , 110–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, FrancesE., and BruceI. Oppenheimer. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, DavidR. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, JohnE. 2011. Inside National Health Reform. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, MarkA. 2012. “The Ideological and Partisan Polarization of Healthcare Reform and Tax Policy.” Tax Law Review 65 (4): 627–67.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, KeithT., and Howard Rosenthal. 2007. Ideology and Congress. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Jeremy, and Jonathan Woon. 2009. “Measuring Changes in American Party Reputations, 1939–2004.” Political Research Quarterly 62: 653–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, Wendy. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, Patrick. 2010. Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, StevenS. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.
   Google Scholar
• Swers, MicheleL. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, AndrewJ. 2012. The Floor in Congressional Life Ann Arbor, MI: University of. Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theriault, SeanM. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. The Gingrich Senators. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volden, Craig, and AlanE. Wiseman. 2011. “Breaking Gridlock: The Determinants of Health Policy Change in Congress.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36: 227–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar