Building Alliances or Rallying the Base: Civil Religious Rhetoric and the Modern Presidency

References

• Adams, David S. 1987. “Ronald Reagan’s ‘Revival’: Voluntarism as a Theme in Reagan’s Civil Religion.” Sociological Analysis 48 (1): 17–29. doi: 10.2307/3711680.
   Google Scholar
• Albertson, Bethany L. 2015. “Dog-Whistle Politics: Multivocal Communication and Religious Appeals.” Political Behavior 37: 3–26. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9265-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, Vanessa B. 2001. “The Rhetoric of Ideological Consensus in the United States: American Principles and American Prose in Presidential Inaugurals.” Communication Monographs 68 (2): 169–83. doi: 10.1080/03637750128055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, Vanessa B. 2004. We the People: American National Identity in Presidential Rhetoric. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, Robert N. 1967. “Civil Religion in America.” Daedalus 134 (4): 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, Robert N. 1992. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, William L. 1999. “Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending in Presidential Nominating Acceptance Addresses, 1960–1996.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 85 (3): 247–67. doi: 10.1080/00335639909384260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Jon R., Richard Fleisher, and B. Dan Wood. 2003. “The Marginal and Time-Varying Effect of Public Approval on Presidential Success in Congress.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 92–100. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00005.
   Google Scholar
• Brace, Paul, and Barbara Hinckley. 1993. “Presidential Activities from Truman through Reagan: Timing and Impact.” Journal of Politics 55 (2): 382–98. doi: 10.2307/2132271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, Seth C., Kevin Coe, and Rico Neumann. 2014. “Newspaper Attention to Major Presidential Addresses: A Reexamination of Conceptualizations, Predictors, and Effects.” Communication Reports 27: 53–64. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2013.858760.
   Google Scholar
• Byrt, Ted, Janet Bishop, and John B. Carlin. 1993. “Bias, Prevalence, and Kappa.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46 (5): 423–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calfano, Brian Robert, and Paul A. Djupe 2009. “God Talk: Religious Cues and Electoral Support.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2): 329–39. doi: 10.1177/1065912908319605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Charles M. 2002. “Studying the Polarized Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 647–63. doi: 10.1177/0360491802238699.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1985. “Inaugurating the Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 15 (2): 394–411.
   Google Scholar
• Chapp, Christopher B. 2012. Religious Rhetoric and American Politics: The Endurance of Civil Religion in Electoral Campaigns. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, James A., and Ronald C. Wimberley. 1978. “Who Is Civil Religious?” Sociological Analysis 39 (1): 77–83. doi: 10.2307/3710163.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Kevin, and Christopher B. Chapp. 2017. “Religious Rhetoric Meets the Target Audience: Narrowcasting Faith in Presidential Elections.” Communication Monographs 84(1): 110–27. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2016.1250932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, Kevin, and Rico Neumann. 2011. “The Major Addresses of Modern Presidents: Parameters of a Data Set.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 727–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03912.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 87–107. doi: 10.2307/2111759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey E., 2004. “If the News Is So Bad, Why Are Presidential Polls So High? Presidents, the News Media, and the Mass Public in an Era of New Media.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 493–515.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffery E., 2011. “Presidents, Polarization and Divided Government.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 504–520.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, John A. 1970. “Civil Religion.” Sociology of Religion 31 (2): 67–77. doi: 10.2307/3710057.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, Phillip E. 2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review 18(1–3): 1–74. doi: 10.1080/08913810608443650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristi, Marcela. 1997. On the Nature of Civil and Political Religion: A Reexamination of the Civil Religion Thesis. Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, Jeff. 2006. “The President’s Domestic Agenda, Divided Government, and the Relationship to the Public Agenda.” American Review of Politics. 27 (Winter): 269–94. doi: 10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2007.27.0.269-294.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demerath III, Nicholas Jay, and Rhys H. Williams 1985. “Civil Religion in an Uncivil Society.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 480 (Religion in American Today): 154–66. doi: 10.1177/0002716285480001013.
   Google Scholar
• Domke, David, and Kevin Coe. 2010. The God Strategy: How Religion Became a Political Weapon in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards III, George C. 2003. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards III, George C. 2009. “Presidential Approval as a Source of Influence in Congress.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, eds. George C. Edwards III and William G. Howell. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 338–61.
   Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew. 2010. “The Politics of Presidential Speeches.” Congress & the Presidency 37 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/07343460903390679.
   Google Scholar
• Flere, Sergej, and Miran Lavric. 2007. “Operationalizing the Civil Religion Concept at a Cross-Cultural Level.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46 (4): 595–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00380.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Daniel Paul, and Michael P. Fix. 2016. “The Best of Times and the Worst of Times.” Polarization and Presidential Success in Congress. 43 (3): 377–94. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2016.1206638.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 1997. “Ideology: A Definitional Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly. 50 (4): 957–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, Fred. 1978. “Change and Continuity in the Modern Presidency.” In The New American Political System, ed. Anthony King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronke, Paul, Jeffrey Koch, and J. Matthew Wilson. 2003. “Follow the Leader? Presidential Approval, Presidential Support, and Representatives’ Electoral Fortunes.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 785–808. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, Kilem. 2002. “Kappa Statistic Is not Satisfactory for Assessing the Extent of Agreement Between Raters.” Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment 1: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Haberski Jr., Raymond. 2012. God and War: American Civil Religion Since 1945. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, Kevin A. 2012. “Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial.” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8 (1): 23–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hart, Roderick P. 1977. The Political Pulpit. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/82.1.136.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Kim Quaile, 1998. “The Policy Agendas of the President and the Mass Public: A Research Validation and Extension.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1328–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. 1981. American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/87.4.1148-a.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Lyndon B. 1965. We Shall Overcome. Washington, DC: Speech presented as a Special Message to Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, Samuel. 2007. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frances E. 2008. “Dividers, Not Uniters: Presidential Leadership and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004.” The Journal of Politics 70 (4): 914–28. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1997. “The Two Rhetorical Presidencies: An Analysis of Televised Presidential Speeches, 1947–1991.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (3): 380–95. doi: 10.1177/1532673X9702500307.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, Bryan, and David Wise. 2014. “Cueing God: Religious Cues and Voter Support.” Politics and Religion 7: 366–94. doi: 10.1017/S175504831400008X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierard, Richard V., and Robert L. Linder. 1988. Civil Religion and the Presidency. Grand Rapids, MI: Academie Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, Ronald W. 1988. State of the Union Address. Washington, DC: Speech presented before the United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, Lyn. 1984. “The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949-1980.” American Political Science Review 78 (4): 971–84. doi: 10.2307/1955802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, Lyn. 2014. Vital Statistics on the Presidency. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Jesse H. 2014. “Party Polarization and the Ascendance of Bipartisan Posturing as a Dominant Strategy in Presidential Rhetoric.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 566–577.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, Kurt W. 1980. “American Political Rhetoric and the Jeremiad Tradition: Presidential Nomination Acceptance Addresses 1960–1976.” Central States Speech Journal 31 (3): 153–71. doi: 10.1080/10510978009368054.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, Douglas, and Nancy J. Rose. 1985. “Passing the President’s Program: Public Opinion and Presidential Influence in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 183–96. doi: 10.2307/2111162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roof, Wade Clark. 2009. “American Presidential Rhetoric from Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush: Another Look at Civil Religion.” Social Compass 56 (2): 286–301. doi: 10.1177/0037768609103363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosevelt, Franklin D. 1936. Acceptance Speech. Speech presented at the Democratic National Convention, June 27, Philadelphia, PA. The American Presidency Project. http://presidency.proxied.lsit.ucsb.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Scacco, Joshua M., and Kevin Coe. 2016. “The Ubiquitous Presidency: Toward a New Paradigm for Studying Presidential Communication.” International Journal of Communication 10: 2014–2037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scacco, Joshua M., Kevin Coe, and Lauren Hearit. 2018. “Presidential Communication in Tumultuous Times: Insights into Key Shifts, Normative Implications, and Research Opportunities.” Annals of the International Communication Association 42 (1): 21–37. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2018.1433962.
   Google Scholar
• Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl, Edward Yager, and Saadi Lahlou. 2012. “Yes, Ronald Reagan’s Rhetoric Was Unique—But Statistically, How Unique?” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42(3): 482–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03990.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shogan, Colleen J. 2007. The Moral Rhetoric of American Presidents. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee. 1996. “Presidential Inaugurals: The Modernization of a Genre.” Political Communication 13: 81–92. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1996.9963096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Richard M. 2009. “George W. Bush and the Partisan Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 123 (4): 605–22. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00636.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Rogers M. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teten, Ryan L. 2003. “Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 333–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2003.tb00033.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Philip E. 1981. “Pre to Postelection Shifts in Presidential Rhetoric: Impression Management or Cognitive Adjustment?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (2): 207–12. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.41.2.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, Felix J., and Lucian Gideon Conway III. 2007. “Integrative Complexity of 41 U.S. Presidents.” Political Psychology, 28 (2): 193–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00562.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toolin, Cynthia. 1983. “American Civil Religion from 1789 to 1981: A Content Analysis of Presidential Inaugural.” Review of Religious Research 25 (1): 39–48. doi: 10.2307/3511310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transue, John E. 2007. “Identity Salience, Identity Acceptance, and Racial Policy Attitudes: American National Identity as a United Force.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 78–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, Sheldon. 1991. “Civil Religion and the Arms Race.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 28 (4): 503–525.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Christopher, and Matthew Thornton. 2012. “Courting Christians: How Political Candidates Prime Religious Considerations in Campaign Ads.” The Journal of Politics 74 (2): 400–13. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611001617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Ellis M. 1980. “A Proposed Neutral Definition of Civil Religion.” Journal of Church and State 22: 23–40. doi: 10.1093/jcs/22.1.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whillock, Rita Kirk. 1994. “Dream Believers: The Unifying Visions and Competing Values of Adherents to American Civil Religion.” Presidential Studies Quarterly. 24 (2): 375–88.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Rhys H., and Susan M. Alexander 1994. “Religious Rhetoric in American Populism: Civil Religion as Movement Ideology.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.2307/1386633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Rhys H., and Nicholas Jay Demerath III. 1991. “Religion and Political Process in an American City.” American Sociological Review 56 (4): 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimberley, Ronald C. 1980. “Civil Religion and the Choice for President Nixon in ’72.” Social Forces 59 (1): 44–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimberley, Ronald C., and James A. Christenson 1982. “Civil Religion, Social Indicators, and Public Policy.” Social Indicators Research 10 (2): 211–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00302511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimberley, Ronald C., Donald A. Clelland, Thomas C. Hood, and C. M. Lipsey. 1976. “The Civil Religious Dimension: Is it There?” Social Forces 54 (4): 890–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. “Divided We Fall: America’s Two Civil Religions.” The Christian Century April, 395–99.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, David. 2004. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 607–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00214.x.
   Google Scholar