REFERENCES
- Butler, S. (2013). The symbolic politics of the Dublin drug court: The complexities of policy transfer. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 20(1), 5–14.
- Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. (2010). Review of the drug treatment court. Retrieved from http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Drug%20Court%20Report%20final.pdf/Files/Drug%20Court%20Report%20final.pdf
- Department of Tourism, Sport and Recreation. (2001). Building on experience: National drugs strategy 2001–2008. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.
- Eggleston, C., & Gehring, T. (1986). Correctional education paradigms in the United States and Canada. Journal of Correctional Education, 37(2), 86–92.
- Farrell, M. (2002). Final evaluation of the pilot drug court. Retrieved from http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/finalevalpilotdrug.pdf/Files/finalevalpilotdrug.pdf
- Fitzgibbon, W., Hamilton, C., & Richardson, M. (2010). A risky business: An examination of Irish probation officers' attitudes towards risk assessment. Probation Journal, 57, 163–174.
- Geiran, V. (2011). Defining what we do: The meaning of “supervision” in probation. Irish Probation Journal, 8, 6–27.
- House of the Oireachtas. (2012). Written answers–Drug courts. Retrieved from http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/07/17/00439.asp
- International Association of Drug Treatment Courts. (2014). Members. Retrieved from http://www.naIDTCp.org/about-us/iadtc-members
- Irish Court Service. (1999). The first report of the drug court planning committee: Pilot project. Dublin, Ireland: The Stationary Office.
- Joint Committee on Health and Children. (2012). Report on the misuse of alcohol and other drugs. Retrieved from http://www.drugs.ie/resourcesfiles/reports/Report-on-The-Misuse-of-Alcohol-and-Other-Drugs.pdf
- Kellog, S., & Tatarsky, A. (2012). Re-envisioning addiction treatment: A six-point plan. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 30(1), 109–128.
- Loughran, H., & McCann, M. E. (2006). A community drugs study: Developing community indicators for problem drug use. Retrieved from http://hse.openrepository.com/hse/bitstream/10147/45173/1/6863.pdf
- Nally, J., Lockwood, S., Knutson, K., & Ho, T. (2012). An evaluation of the effect of correctional education programs on post-release recidivism and employment: An empirical study in Indiana. Journal of Correctional Education, 63(1), 69–89.
- National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2004). Defining drug courts: The key components. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/205621.pdf
- Nolan, J. L. (2010). Harm reduction and the American difference: Drug treatment and problem-solving courts in comparative perspective. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 31(1), 31–47.
- O'Gorman, A. (1998). Illicit drug use in Ireland: An overview of the problem and policy responses. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(1), 155–166.
- O'Sullivan, J. N. (2012). An examination of the practitioners' role in promoting compliance with participants in the Irish drug treatment court. Retrieved from http://arrow.dit.ie/aaschssldis/57/
- Probation Service. (2013). Internal audit report on IDTC. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
- Rotgers, F. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral theories of substance abuse. In S. T. Walters & F. Rotgers (Eds.), Treating substance abuse: Theory and technique (3rd ed., pp. 113–137). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Seiger, B. (2014). The clinical practice of harm reduction psychotherapy. In S. L. A. Straussner (Ed.), Clinical work with substance-abusing clients (3rd ed., pp. 165–178). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493–521.
- Shaffer, D. K., Hartman, J. L., Listwan, S. J., Howell, T., & Latessa, E. J. (2011). Outcomes among drug court participants: Does drug of choice matter? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 155–174.
- Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2003). Drug treatment in the community: A case study of system integration issues. Federal Probation, 67, 4–14.
- Wexler, D. B. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the criminal courts. In D. B. Wexler & J. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 157–170). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.