Learning through the experience of cancer survivorship: differences across age groups

References

• Mayer DK, Nasso SF, Earp JA. Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e11–e8. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30573-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute. Survivorship definitions. National Cancer Institute; 2019. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/statistics/index.html#definitions.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt M, Grenfield S, Stoval E, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivors: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, Institute of medicine; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, Arora NK, Rowland JH. Going beyond being lost in transition: a decade of progress in cancer survivorship. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(18):1978–1981. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattison CA, Moat KA, Waddell K, Lavis JN. Evidence Brief: Optimizing Patient and Family Transitions from Cancer Treatment to Primary-and Community-care Supports in Canada. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Recklitis CJ, Syrjala KL. Provision of integrated psychosocial services for cancer survivors post-treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e39–e50. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30659-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Cancer Reasearch Alliance/Alliance canadienne de la recherche sur le cancer. Pan-Canadian Framework for Cancer Survivorship Research: CCRA; 2017. http://www.ccra-acrc.ca/index.php/publications-en/strategy-related-publications/item/pan-canadian-framework-for-cancer-survivorship-research.
   Google Scholar
• Nekhlyudov L, Mollica MA, Jacobsen PB, Mayer DK, Shulman LN, Geiger AM. Developing a quality of cancer survivorship care framework: Implications for clinical care, research and policy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(11):1120–1130. doi:10.1093/jnci/djz089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosty MP, Hanley A, Chollette V, Bruinooge SS, Taplin SH. National Cancer Institute–American Society of Clinical Oncology Teams in Cancer Care Project. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch M. Supportive care framework. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2008;18(1):6–14. doi:10.5737/1181912x181614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell DD. Supported self-management for cancer survivors to address long-term biopsychosocial consequences of cancer and treatment to optimize living well. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(1):92–99. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truant TL, Fitch MI, O'Leary C, Stewart J. Global perspectives on cancer survivorship: From lost in transition to leading into the future. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2017;27(3):287–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doherty M, Miller-Sonet E, Gardner D, Epstein I. Exploring the role of psychosocial care in value-based oncology: results from a survey of 3000 cancer patients and survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(4):441–455. doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1504851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt V, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Jansen L, et al. Quality of life in long-term and very long-term cancer survivors versus population controls in Germany. Acta Oncologica. 2017;56(2):190–197. doi:10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burg MA, Adorno G, Lopez ED, et al. Current unmet needs of cancer survivors: analysis of open-ended responses to the American Cancer Society Study of Cancer Survivors II . Cancer. 2015;121(4):623–630. doi:10.1002/cncr.28951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey L, Mooney O, Dunne S, et al. Cancer survivors' perspectives on adjustment-focused self-management interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis . J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(6):1012–1034. doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0546-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veach TA, Nicholas DR, Barton MA. Cancer and the Family Life Cycle: A Practitioner's Guide. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn S, McMillan J, Pulvirenti M. Chronic condition self-management: expectations of responsibility. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):e5–e8. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jouet E, Flora L, Las Vergnas O. Construction et reconnaissance des savoirs expérientiels des patients. Pratiques de formation-Analyses. 2010;2010(58/59):olivier_lv.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. London: FT Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey J. Philosophy and Civilization. New York: Minton, B; 1933.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut M. Developing a broader approach to professional learning. In: McKee A., Eraut M, eds. Learning trajectories, innovation and identity for professional development. Innovation and change in professional education, vol. 7. London: Springer Science + Business Media B.V; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ng SL, Kinsella EA, Friesen F, Hodges B. Reclaiming a theoretical orientation to reflection in medical education research: a critical narrative review. Med Educ. 2015;49(5):461–475. doi:10.1111/medu.12680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayn M-G, Des Garets V, Rivière A. Mieux comprendre le processus d’empowerment du patient. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion. 2017; 119(2):55–73. doi:10.3917/resg.119.0055
   Google Scholar
• Playdon M, Ferrucci LM, McCorkle R, et al. Health information needs and preferences in relation to survivorship care plans of long-term cancer survivors in the American Cancer Society’s Study of Cancer Survivors-I. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(4):674–685. doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0513-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soanes L, Gibson F. Protecting an adult identity: a grounded theory of supportive care for young adults recently diagnosed with cancer. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;81:40–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer E, Pieters HC, Ganz PA, Landier W, Pavlish C, Heilemann MV, editors. Coming of Age With Cancer: Physical, Social, and Financial Barriers to Independence Among Emerging Adult Survivors. ONF. 2018; 45(2):148–158. doi:10.1188/18.ONF.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Burgers J, Grol R. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial. Implementation Sci. 2014;9(1):24. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacristán JA, Aguarón A, Avendaño-Solá C, et al. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10(631):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Desgagné S. Le concept de recherche collaborative: l’idée d’un rapprochement entre chercheurs universitaires et praticiens enseignants. RSE. 2007;23(2):371–393. doi:10.7202/031921ar
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissette J. Recherche-action et recherche collaborative: Quel rapport aux savoirs et à la production de savoirs? nps. 2013;25(2):35–49. doi:10.7202/1020820ar
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Saldaña J, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. xxiii, p. 381.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison C, Dearden A. Beyond tokenistic participation: using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design. Health Policy. 2013;112(3):179–186. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982;4(2):167–182. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Iannarino NT, Scott AM, Shaunfield SL. Normative social support in young adult cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(2):271–284. doi:10.1177/1049732315627645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer A. The biographical impact of teenage and adolescent cancer. Chronic Illn. 2007;3(4):265–277. doi:10.1177/1742395307085335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trusson D, Pilnick A, Roy S. A new normal?: Women's experiences of biographical disruption and liminality following treatment for early stage breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:121–129. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch M, Zomer S, Lockwood G, et al. Experiences of adult cancer survivors in transitions. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(8):2977–2986. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4605-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LE. People don’t understand that it is not easy being a cancer survivor: Communicating and negotiating identity throughout cancer survivorship. Southern Communication Journal. 2015;80(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2014.936971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker AJ, Lewis FM, Lin Y, Zahlis E, Rosenberg AR. Trying to feel normal again: Early survivorship for adolescent cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2019;42(4):E11–E21. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BL, Parker-Raley J, Barczyk A. Adolescent cancer survivors: identity paradox and the need to belong. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(8):1033–1040. doi:10.1177/1049732311404029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, White K, Patterson P. Understanding the experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer: a meta-synthesis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;24:39–53. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellizzi KM, Dibble KE. The integration of aging and gender to understand the cancet experience among older adults. In: Youngmee K, Loscalzo MJ, editors. Gender in Psycho-Oncology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bellizzi KM, Mustian KM, Palesh OG, Diefenbach M. Cancer survivorship and aging : moving the science forward. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2008;113(12 Suppl):3530–3539. doi:10.1002/cncr.23942
   Google Scholar
• Oktay JS, Walter CA. Breast Cancer in the Life Course: Women's Experiences. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bilodeau K, Tremblay D, Durand M-J. Return to work after breast cancer treatments: Rebuilding everything despite feeling “in-between”. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019;41:165–172. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2019.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greidanus M, Boer A, Rijk A, et al. Perceived employer‐related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: A systematic review of employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Psycho‐Oncology. 2017;27(3):725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde C. Sociologie Des Âges de la Vie. Paris: Armand Colin; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Collet B. Cécile van de Velde, Sociologie des âges de la vie. Paris, Armand Colin (128 Tout le savoir), 2015. Temporalités Revue de Sciences Sociales et Humaines. 2016;(23):1–15
   Google Scholar
• Heywood A. Political Ideologies: An Introduction. London: Macmillan International Higher Education; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone R. Social Policy Trends. University of Calgary; 2019. https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SPT-Birth-Rates-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Young adults living with their parents in Canada in 2016. Ottawa: Miniter of Industry; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pînzaru F, Vătămănescu E-M, Mitan A, et al. Millennials at work: Investigating the specificity of generation Y versus other generations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy. 2016;4(2):173–192.
   Google Scholar