A feasibility study of virtual group therapy to improve quality of life of cancer caregivers

References

• AARP and National Alliance for Caregiving. 2020. Caregiving in the United States 2020. Washington, DC: AARP. doi:10.26419/ppi.00103.001
   Google Scholar
• Banbury A, Nancarrow S, Dart J, et al. Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e25. doi:10.2196/jmir.8090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum K, Sherman DW. Understanding the experience of caregivers: a focus on transitions. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2010;26(4):243–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chua GP, Ng QS, Tan HK, et al. Caregivers of cancer patients: what are their information-seeking behaviours and resource preferences? Ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14:1068. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2020.1068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretscher M, Rummans T, Sloan J, et al. Quality of life in hospice patients. A pilot study. Psychosomatics. 1999;40(4):309–313. doi:10.1016/S0033-3182(99)71224-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, et al. Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update - the growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. 2011. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/ltc/i51-caregiving.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark MM, Rummans TA, Sloan JA, et al. Quality of life of caregivers of patients with advanced-stage cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23(3):185–191. doi:10.1177/1049909106289074
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coughlin J. Estimating the impact of caregiving and employment on well-being. Outcome Insight Health Manage. 2010;2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Furness K, Sarkies MN, Huggins CE, et al. Impact of the method of delivering electronic health behavior change interventions in survivors of cancer on engagement, health behaviors, and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e16112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentry MT, Lapid MI, Clark MM, et al. Evidence for telehealth group-based treatment: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(6):327–342. doi:10.1177/1357633X18775855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan KE, McKean AJ, Gentry MT, et al. Barriers to use of telepsychiatry: clinicians as gatekeepers. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(12):2510–2523. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Kaur JS, Rummans T, et al. The hospice patient’s primary caregiver. What is their quality of life? J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(5):445–451. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00513-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunberg SM, Groshen S, Steingass S, et al. Comparison of conditional quality of life terminology and visual analogue scale measurements. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(1):65–72. doi:10.1007/BF00435970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudex C, Dolan P, Kind P, et al. Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):521–531. doi:10.1007/BF00439226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynsbergh N, Heckel L, Botti M, et al. Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):244. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu C, Kung S, Rummans TA, et al. Reducing caregiver stress with internet-based interventions: a systematic review of open-label and randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(e1):e194–e209. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilty DM, Ferrer DC, Parish MB, et al. The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(6):444–454. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. 2008. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland ME, Sodergren SC. Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(5):469–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbaugh DJ, Klem ML, Hu L, et al. Using web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015;42(2):156–164. doi:10.1188/15.ONF.156-164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1987–1995. doi:10.1002/cncr.29939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnane NA, Milne DJ. The role of the internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(9):1123–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, et al. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):317–339. doi:10.3322/caac.20081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke DE, Decker PA, Sloan JA, et al. Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(6):628–638. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reblin M, Ketcher D, Forsyth P, et al. Feasibility of implementing an electronic social support and resource visualization tool for caregivers in a neuro-oncology clinic. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(12):4199–4206. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4293-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ransom S, Azzarello LM, McMillan SC. Methodological issues in the recruitment of cancer pain patients and their caregivers. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(3):190–198. doi:10.1002/nur.20129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northouse L, Schafenacker A, Barr KL, et al. A tailored web-based psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(5):321–330. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Clark MM, et al. Cancer caregiver: perceived benefits of technology. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 2015;21(11):893–902. doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Visintainer P, Williamson GM. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of caregiving. The Journals of Gerontology. 1990;45:181–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloan JA, Shi Q, Lee A, et al. Relationship between genetic markers and quality of life in stage III colon cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment (N0147). JCO. 2012;30(15_suppl):3617–3617. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3617
   Google Scholar
• Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, et al. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983;34(2):234–239. doi:10.1038/clpt.1983.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, et al. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6(6):CD009912. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:53–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevino KM, Raghunathan N, Latte-Naor S, et al. Rapid deployment of virtual mind-body interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: feasibility, acceptability, and implications for future care. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(2):543–546. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05740-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitaliano PP, Zhang J, Scanlan JM. Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bulletin. 2003;129(6):946–972. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar