Dyadic support across contraceptive decision-making among young adult breast cancer survivors and their partners

References

• Fridgen O, Sehovic I, Bowman ML, et al. Contraception: the need for expansion of counsel in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) cancer care. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(4):924–932. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1003-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green DM, Sklar CA, Boice JD, Mulvihill JJ, et al. Ovarian failure and reproductive outcomes after childhood cancer treatment: Results from the childhood cancer survivor study. JCO. 2009;27(14):2374–2381. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadnott TN, Stark SS, Medica A, et al. Perceived infertility and contraceptive use in the female, reproductive-age cancer survivor. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):763–771. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn MM, Letourneau JM, Rosen MP. Contraception after cancer treatment: describing methods, counseling, and unintended pregnancy risk. Contraception. 2014;89(5):466–471. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorello LB, Cohen SS, Bosetti C, et al. Female survivors of childhood cancer: preterm birth and low birth weight among their children. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(20):1453–1461. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mody SK, Gorman JR, Oakley LP, Layton T, Parker BA, Panelli D. Contraceptive utilization and counseling among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(3):438–446. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00765-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominick SA, McLean MR, Whitcomb BW, et al. Contraceptive practices among female cancer survivors of reproductive age. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):498–507. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz EB, Hess R, Trussell J. Contraception for cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 (Suppl 2):S401–S406. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1023-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis K, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, et al. US Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC) for Contraceptive Use, 2016. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006;32(2):89–94. doi:10.1783/147118906776276170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maslow B-SL, Morse CB, Schanne A, Loren A, Domchek SM, Gracia CR. Contraceptive use and the role of contraceptive counseling in reproductive-aged women with cancer. Contraception. 2014;90(1):79–85. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelman SH, Cron J. Contraception counseling and use among adolescent and young adult female patients undergoing cancer treatment: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;33(6):652–657. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2020.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen L, Ruan JY, Cheung WY. Discussions about reproductive and sexual health among young adult survivors of cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5(6):1037–1046. doi:10.1002/cam4.666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman JR, Bailey S, Pierce JP, Su HI. How do you feel about fertility and parenthood? The voices of young female cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(2):200–209. doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0211-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Sreedevi M, Malapati R, et al. Reproductive health assessment for women with cancer: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):191.e1–191.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29(2):169–180. doi:10.1037/a0018165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith DJ, Miller GA. Conceptualizing how couples talk about cancer. Health Commun. 2014;29(1):51–63. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.717215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman JR, Smith E, Drizin JH, Lyons KS, Harvey SM. Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(11):5429–5439. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05396-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keesing S, Rosenwax L, McNamara B. A dyadic approach to understanding the impact of breast cancer on relationships between partners during early survivorship. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16:57. 10.1186/s12905-016-0337-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Loke AY. A literature review on the mutual impact of the spousal caregiver-cancer patients dyads: ‘communication’, ‘reciprocal influence’, and ‘caregiver-patient congruence’. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(1):58–65. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2013.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillie HM, Venetis MK, Chernichky-Karcher SM. "He would never let me just give up": communicatively constructing dyadic resilience in the experience of breast cancer. Health Commun. 2018;33(12):1516–1524. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1372049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalas J, Garbers S, Gold MA, Allegrante JP, Bell DL. Young men’s communication with partners and contraception use: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(3):342–353. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox S, Posner SF, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Who’s responsible? Correlates of partner involvement in contraceptive decision making. Womens Health Issues. 2010;20(4):254–259. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Billy JOG, Cubbins LA. The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US. J Biosoc Sci. 2010;42(3):307–323. doi:10.1017/S0021932009990575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinberg D, Jaccard J. Dyadic Decision Making. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Queen TL, Berg CA, Lowrance W. A framework for decision making in couples across adulthood. Chapter 18. In: Hess TM, Strough J, Löckenhoff CE, eds. Aging and Decision Making. San Diego: Academic Press; 2015:371–392. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-417148-0.00018-2
   Google Scholar
• DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research: Strategies for Improving Public Health. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine hiv-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:539–565. doi:10.1177/109019810002700502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin HJ, Rubin I. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2008. doi:10.4135/9781452230153
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitat Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Eisikovits Z, Koren C. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(12):1642–1655. doi:10.1177/1049732310376520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO | Family Planning/Contraception. Geneva: WHO; 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/. Accessed February 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy D, Klosky JL, Termuhlen A, Sawczyn KK, Quinn GP. The need for reproductive and sexual health discussions with adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Contraception. 2013;88(2):215–220. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis DA, Martins SL, Gilliam ML. Partner roles in contraceptive use: what do adolescent mothers say? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(6):396–400. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2012.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strough J, McFall JP, Schuller KL. Endorsement of interpersonal strategies for dealing with hypothetical everyday arthritis problems as a function of marital status, gender, and problem severity. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;70(1):39–59. doi:10.2190/AG.70.1.b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig Kellas J, Castle KM, Johnson AZ, Cohen MZ. Cancer as communal: understanding communication and relationships from the perspectives of survivors, family caregivers, and health care providers. Health Commun. 2021;36(3):213–280. doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.1683952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzona MR, Fisher CL, Wright KB, Ledford CJW. Talking about sexual health during survivorship: understanding what shapes breast cancer survivors’ willingness to communicate with providers. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(6):932–942. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00809-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar