Testing the Unconfoundedness Assumption via Inverse Probability Weighted Estimators of (L)ATT

REFERENCES

• Abadie, A. (2003), “Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Estimation of Treatment Response Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 113, 231–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., Angrist, J., and Imbens, G. (2002), “Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings,” Econometrica, 70, 91–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrevaya, J., Hsu, Y.-C., and Lieli, R.P. (2013), “Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects,” working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M., Lechner, M., and Wunsch, C. (2013), “The Performance of Estimators Based on the Propensity Score,” Journal of Econometrics, 175, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H.S. (1984), “Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs,” Evaluation Review, 8, 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H.S., Orr, L.L., Bell, S.H., Cave, G., Doolittle, F., Lin, W., and Bos, J.M. (1997), “The Benefits and Costs of JTPA Title II-A Programs: Key Findings From the National Job Training Partnership Act Study,” Journal of Human Resources, 32, 549–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Hong, H., and Tarozzi, A. (2008), “Semiparametric Efficiency in GMM Models With Auxiliary Data,” The Annals of Statistics, 36, 808–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. (2009), “Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics, and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 2008 Lectures, 162, 123–160.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, S.G. and Hsu, Y.-C. (2014), “Estimation and Inference for Distribution Functions and Quantile Functions in Treatment Effect Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 178, 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frölich, M. (2007), “Nonparametric IV Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects With Covariates,” Journal of Econometrics, 139, 35–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frölich, M., and Lechner, M. (2010), “Exploiting Regional Treatment Intensity for the Evaluation of Labour Market Policies,” Journal of American Statistical Association, 105, 1014–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frölich, M., and Melly, B. (2013a), “Identification of Treatment Effects on the Treated With One-Sided Non-Compliance,” Econometric Reviews, 32, 384–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frölich, M., and Melly, B. (2013b), “Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects under Endogeneity,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 31, 346–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenberger, P. (2010), “The Impact of a Hausman Pretest on the Size of Hypothesis Tests,” Econometric Theory, 26, 369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, J. (1998), “On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica, 66, 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1997), “Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations,” The Journal of Human Resources, 32, 441–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., Hohmann, N., Smith, J., and Khoo, M. (2000), “Substitution and Dropout Bias in Social Experiments: A Study of an Influential Social Experiment,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 651–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., and Urzúa, S. (2010), “Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify,” Journal of Econometrics, 156, 123–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, K., Imbens, G., and Ridder, G. (2003), “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score,” Econometrica, 71, 1161–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H., and Nekipelov, D. (2010), “Semiparametric Efficiency in Nonlinear LATE Models,” Quantitative Economics, 1, 279–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichimura, H., and Linton, O. (2005), “Asymptotic Expansions for Some Semiparametric Program Evaluation Estimators,” in Volume in Honor of Tom Rothenberg, eds. D. Andrews and J. Stock, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. (2010), “Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzúa (2009),” Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 399–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G., and Angrist, J. (1994), “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica, 62, 467–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G.W., Newey, W., and Ridder, G. (2007), “Mean-Squared-Error Calculations for Average Treatment Effects,” working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Racine, J.S., and Wooldridge, J.M. (2009), “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects With Mixed Categorical and Continuous Data,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 27, 206–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., and Rubin, D. (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, A. (1940), “The Fitting of Straight Lines if Both Variables are Subject to Error,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 284–300.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J.M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar