Homothetic Efficiency: Theory and Applications

REFERENCES

• Afriat, S. N. (1967), “The Construction of Utility Functions From Expenditure Data,” International Economic Review, 8, 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1972), “Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions,” International Economic Review, 13, 568–598.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, J. M., Carter, C. A., Green, R., and Pick, D. (1990), “Whither Armington Trade Models?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J., and Miller, J. (2002), “Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism,” Econometrica, 70, 737–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apesteguia, J., and Ballester, M. A. (2015), “A Measure of Rationality and Welfare,” Journal of Political Economy, 123, 1278–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, T. K. M., and Crawford, I. A. (2011), “How Demanding is the Revealed Preference Approach to Demand?” American Economic Review, 101, 2782–2795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., Browning, M., and Crawford, I. (2003), “Nonparametric Engel Curves and Revealed Preference,” Econometrica, 71, 205–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronars, S. G. (1987), “The Power of Nonparametric Tests of Preference Maximization,” Econometrica, 55, 693–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, M., and Collado, M. D. (2001), “The Response of Expenditures to Anticipated Income Changes: Panel Data Estimates,” American Economic Review, 91, 681–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camille, N., Griffiths, C. A., Vo, K., Fellows, L. K., and Kable, J. W. (2011), “Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Disrupts Value Maximization in Humans,” The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 7527–7532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Sabbe, J., and Vermeulen, F. (2008), “Nonparametric Tests of Collectively Rational Consumption Behavior: An Integer Programming Procedure,” Journal of Econometrics, 147, 258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., and Hjertstrand, P. (2015), “Revealed Preference Tests for Weak Separability: An Integer Programming Approach,” Journal of Econometrics, 186, 129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Fisman, R., Gale, D., and Kariv, S. (2007a), “Consistency and Heterogeneity of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty,” American Economic Review, 97, 1921–1938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2007b), “Revealing Preferences Graphically: An Old Method Gets a New Tool Kit,” American Economic Review, 97, 153–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. (1997), “On Testing the Utility Hypothesis,” The Economic Journal, 107, 1054–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, I. (2010), “Habits Revealed,” The Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1382–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M., and Martin, D. (2015), “Measuring Rationality With the Minimum Cost of Revealed Preference Violations,” working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. L. (2009), “Experiment Timing and Preferences for Fairness,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Diewert, W. E. (1973), “Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory,” Review of Economic Studies, 40, 419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1976), “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers,” Journal of Econometrics, 4, 115–145.
   Google Scholar
• Echenique, F., Lee, S., and Shum, M. (2011), “The Money Pump as a Measure of Revealed Preference Violations,” Journal of Political Economy, 119, 1201–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., and Grossman, P. J. (1996), “Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Février, P., and Visser, M. (2004), “A Study of Consumer Behavior Using Laboratory Data,” Experimental Economics, 7, 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., Kariv, S., and Markovits, D. (2007), “Individual Preferences for Giving,” American Economic Review, 97, 1858–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleissig, A. R., and Whitney, G. A. (2005), “Testing for the Significance of Violations of Afriat’s Inequalities,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23, 355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy, Y., Persitz, D., and Zrill, L. (2015), “Parametric Recoverability of Preferences,” working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2016), “The Individual and the Market: Paul Samuelson on (homothetic) Santa Claus Economics,” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23, 425–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanoch, G., and Rothschild, M. (1972), “Testing the Assumptions of Production Theory: A Nonparametric Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 80, 256–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., and Berry, T. R. (2001), “GARP for Kids: On the Development of Rational Choice Behavior,” American Economic Review, 91, 1539–1545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heufer, J. (2008), “A Geometric Measure for the Violation of Utility Maximization,” Ruhr Economic Papers, #69, TU Dortmund University, Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Testing for Utility Maximization With Error and the Loss of Power,” German Economic Review, 13, 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2013), “Testing Revealed Preferences for Homotheticity With Two-Good Experiments,” Experimental Economics, 16, 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heufer, J., and Hjertstrand, P. (2015), “Consistent Subsets: Computationally Feasible Methods to Compute the Houtman-Maks-Index,” Economics Letters, 128, 87–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtman, M., and Maks, J. (1985), “Determining All Maximal Data Subsets Consistent With Revealed Preference,” Kwantitatieve Methoden, 19, 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Jerison, M., and Jerison, D. (2012), “Real Income Growth and Revealed Preference Inconsistency,” working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, V. (1993), “Recovering Homothetic Preferences,” Economics Letters, 43, 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P.-W., and Wong, K.-C. (2000), “Revealed Homothetic Preference and Technology,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34, 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei, A. (2000), “Full-Scale Real Tests of Consumer Behavior Using Experimental Data,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 487–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1938), “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior,” Economica, 5, 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Selten, R. (1991), “Properties of a Measure of Predictive Success,” Mathematical Social Sciences, 21, 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serletis, A., and Rangel-Ruiz, R. (2005), “Microeconometrics and Measurement Matters: Some Results From Monetary Economics for Canada,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 27, 307–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sippel, R. (1997), “An Experiment on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior,” The Economic Journal, 107, 1431–1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford, J. L., and Whitney, G. A. (1987), “Nonparametric Tests of Utility Maximization and Weak Separability for Consumption, Leisure and Money,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 458–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1988), “A Comparison of Nonparametric Tests of Weak Separability for Annual and Quarterly Data on Consumption, Leisure, and Money,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 6, 241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1994), “A Revealed Preference Test for Weakly Separable Utility Maximization With Incomplete Adjustment,” Journal of Econometrics, 60, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R. (1982), “The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis,” Econometrica, 50, 945–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1983), “Non-Parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour,” Review of Economic Studies, 50, 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1984), “The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis,” Econometrica, 52, 579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1990), “Goodness-of-Fit in Optimizing Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 46, 125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1993), Goodness-of-Fit for Revealed Preference Tests, Working Paper, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar