326
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Imagining Pedagogical Agency: Shifting from Students and Teachers to Elements and Relations

Works Cited

  • Ahmed, Sara. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke UP, 2012.
  • Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge, 2004.
  • Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2010.
  • Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.” When a Writer Can’t Write: Studies in Writer’s Block and Other Composing-Process Problems. Ed. Mike Rose. New York: Guilford, 1985. 134–66.
  • Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. 1979. Cresskill: Hampton, 2002.
  • Beach, Richard, and Margaret J. Finders. “Students as Ethnographers: Guiding Alternative Research Projects.” English Journal 89.1 (1999): 82–90.
  • Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke UP, 2010.
  • Berlin, James A. Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900–1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1987.
  • Bishop, Wendy. “Because Teaching Composition is (Still) Mostly about Teaching Composition.” Composition Studies in the New Millenium: Rereading the Past, Rewriting the Future. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2003. 65–77.
  • Brooke, Colin. “Weblogs as Deictic Systems: Centripetal, Centrifugal, and Small-World Blogging.” C&C Online (2005): n.p. Web. 11 May 2012.
  • Brooke, Robert. “Underlife and Writing Instruction.” College Composition and Communication 38.2 (1987): 141–53.
  • Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.
  • Burke, Kenneth. “Language as Action: Terministic Screens.” On Symbols and Society. Ed. Joseph R. Gusfield. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1989.
  • Burke, Kenneth. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. 3rd ed. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.
  • Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech. New York: Routledge, 1997.
  • Connors, Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1997.
  • Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, eds. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, Politics. Duke UP, 2010.
  • Cooper, Marilyn M. “Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted.” College Composition and Communication 62.3 (2011): 420–49.
  • Coulmas, Florian. Writing Systems: An Introduction to Their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
  • Crowley, Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1996.
  • Dingo, Rebecca. Networking Arguments: Rhetoric, Transnational Feminism, and Public Policy Writing. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburg P, 2012.
  • DiPardo, Anne, and Melanie Sperling. “Negotiating Complexity.” Research in the Teaching of English 39.4 (2005): 317–19.
  • Dobrin, Sidney I. Postcomposition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2011.
  • Drew, Julie. “The Politics of Place: Student Travelers and Pedagogical Maps.” Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches. Ed. Christian R. Weisser and Sidney I. Dobrin. Albany: SUNY P, 2001. 57–68.
  • Dryer, Dylan B. “Composing Citizens: Epistemic Work in the Interstices of Comprehensive-Planning Genres.” Community Literacy Journal 5.1 (2010): 25–56.
  • Elbow, Peter. Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford UP, 1973.
  • Enos, Theresa, ed. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. New York: Routledge, 2010.
  • Geisler, Cheryl. “How Ought We to Understand the Concept of Rhetorical Agency? Report from the ARS.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34.3 (2004): 9–17.
  • Hallenbeck, Sarah. “Toward a Posthuman Perspective: Feminist Rhetorical Methodologies and Everyday Practices.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric 15 (2012): 9–27.
  • Halloran, Michael S. “Aristotle’s Concept of Ethos, or if Not His, Somebody Else’s.” Rhetoric Review 1.1 (1982): 58–63.
  • Hamilton, Mark A., et al. “Individualistic and Cooperative Affective Systems as Determinants of Aggressive or Collaborate Message Choice.” Biological Dimensions of Communication. Ed. Michael J. Beatty, James C. McCroskey, and Kory Floyd. Cresskill: Hampton, 2009. 227–50.
  • Harris, Joseph. A Teaching Subject: Composition Since 1966. 2nd ed. Logan: Utah State UP, 2011.
  • Hawk, Byron. A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2007.
  • Helmers, Marguerite H. Writing Students: Composition Testimonials and Representations of Students. Albany: SUNY P, 1994.
  • Hesse, Douglas. “Composition as Pedagogy or Scholarship. Students as Writers or Workers.” Composition Studies 29.2 (2001): 121–32.
  • Holiday, Judy. “In[ter]vention: Location Rhetoric’s Ethos.” Rhetoric Review 28.4 (2009): 388–405.
  • Horner, Bruce. Terms of Work for Composition: A Materialist Critique. Albany: SUNY P, 2000.
  • Hyde, Michael J. “Introduction: Rhetorically We Dwell.” The Ethos of Rhetoric. Ed. Michael J. Hyde. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2004. xiii–xxviii.
  • Jung, Julie. “Rhetoric and Composition’s Emotional Economy of Identification.” Enculturation 9 (2010) : n. pag. Web. 11 May 2012.
  • Kershbaum, Stephanie L. “On Rhetorical Agency and Disclosing Disability in Academic Writing.” Rhetoric Review 33.1 (2014): 55–71.
  • Kopelson, Karen L. “Sp(l)itting Images: Or, Back to the Future of (Rhetoric and?) Composition.” College Composition and Communication 59.4 (2008): 750–80.
  • Lindgren, Eva, Kirk P. H. Sullivan, Urban Lindgren, and Kristyan Spelman Miller. “GIS for Writing: Applying Geographical Information Systems Techniques to Data Mine Writings’ Cognitive Processes.” Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications. Ed. Mark Torrance, Luuk van Waes, and David Galbraith. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007. 83–96.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. Social Systems Theory. Trans. John Bednarz, Jr. and Dirk Baecker. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 1996.
  • Lundberg, Christian, and Joshua Gunn. “‘Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, or, Continuing the ARS Conversation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35.4 (2005): 83–106.
  • Miller, Richard E. “From Intellectual Wasteland to Resource-Rich Colony: Capitalizing on the Role of Writing Instruction in Higher Education.” WPA: Writing Program Administration 24.3 (2001): 25–40.
  • Miller, Susan, ed. The Norton Book of Composition Studies. New York: Norton, 2009.
  • Nelson, Jennie, and Diane Kelly-Riley. “Students as Stakeholders: Maintaining a Responsive Assessment.” Beyond Outcomes: Assessment and Instruction Within a University Writing Program. Ed. Richard H. Haswell. Westport: Ablex, 2001. 143–60.
  • North, Stephen M. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Upper Montclair: Boynton/Cook, 1987.
  • Olson, Gary A., ed. Rhetoric and Composition as Intellectual Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002.
  • Powell, Beth, Kara Poe Alexander, and Sonya Borton. “Interaction of Author, Audience, and Purpose in Multimodal texts: Students’ Discovery of Their Role as Composer.” Kairos 15.2 (2011) Web. 4 Apr 2014.
  • Prior, Paul. “From Speech Genres to Mediated Multimodal Genre Systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the Question of Writing.” Genre in a Changing World. Ed. Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Debora Figueiredo. West Lafayette: Parlor, 2009. 17–34.
  • Puar, Jasbir K. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke UP, 2007.
  • Purdy, James P., and Joyce R. Walker. “Liminal Spaces and Research Identity: The Construction of Introductory Composition Students as Researchers.” Pedagogy 13.1 (2013): 9–41.
  • Ritter, Kelly. Who Owns School? Authority, Students and Online Discourse. Cresskill: Hampton, 2010.
  • Robillard, Amy E. “Young Scholars Affecting Compositon: A Challenge to Disciplinary Citation Practices.” College English 68.3 (2006): 253–70.
  • Roderick, Noah R. “Analogize This! The Politics of Scale and the Problem of Substance in Complexity-Based Composition.” Composition Forum 25 (2012): n. pag. Web. 11 May 2012.
  • Rose, Mike. “The Language of Exclusion.” College English 47 (1985): 341–59.
  • Sharp-Hoskins, Kellie, and Amy E. Robillard. “Narrating the ‘Good Teacher’ in Rhetoric and Composition: Ideology, Affect, Complicity.” JAC 32.1–2 (2012): 305–36.
  • Shaughnessy, Mina P. Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford UP, 1977.
  • Sidler, Michelle. “Claiming Research: Students as ‘Citizen-Experts’ in WAC-Oriented Composition.” WAC Journal 16 (2005): 49–60.
  • Straub, Richard. “Teaching Writing as Writing: Teaching Students as Student Writers.” Teaching/Writing in the Late Age of Print. Ed. Jeffrey R. Galin, Carol Peterson, and J. Paul Johnson. Cresskill: Hampton, 2003. 15–26.
  • Villanueva, Victor, and Kristin L. Arola. Cross-Talk in Comp Theory. 3rd ed. Urbana: NCTE, 2011.
  • Wardle, Elizabeth, and Kevin Roozen. “Addressing the Complexity of Writing Development: Toward an Ecological Model of Assessment.” Assessing Writing (Feb. 2007).
  • William, Joseph M. “The Phenomenology of Error.” College Composition and Communication 32.2 (1981): 152–68.
  • Worsham, Lynn. “Going Postal: Pedagogic Violence and the Schooling of Emotion.” JAC 18.1 (1998): 213–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.