I-BEAM: Instance Source Use and Research Writing Pedagogy

Works Cited

• Anson, Chris M. “Citation as Speech Act: Exploring the Pragmatics of Reference.” Research Writing Revisited: A Sourcebook for Teachers. Ed. Pavel Zemliansky and Wendy Bishop. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2004. 203–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.” When a Writer Can’t Write: Studies in Writer’s Block and Other Composing Process Problems. Ed. Mike Rose. New York: Guilford, 1985. 134–65. Rpt. in Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997. 589–619.
   Google Scholar
• Berrett, Dan. “Freshman Composition is not Teaching Key Skills, Researchers Argue.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Web. 21 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, Lloyd. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (1968): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bizup, Joseph. “BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing.” Rhetoric Review 27.1 (2008): 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, Robert J. “The Rhetoric of Citations Systems, Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in Citation.” Rhetoric Review 17.2 (1999): 219–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, Lisa. Situating Composition: Composition Studies and the Politics of Location. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, Aaron M. “Niches: Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards.” Ecology 85.3 (2004): 880–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, Robert William, and Stanley Engerman. Time on the Cross: The Economics of Negro Slavery. Boston: Little, Brown, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, Robert William. Time on the Cross: Evidence and Methods—A Supplement. Boston: Little, Brown, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: Norton, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Grafton, Anthony. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, Herbert G. Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1975. Originally published as “The World Two Cliometricians Made: A Review-Essay of F+E=T/C,” Journal of Negro History 60.1 (1975): 53–227. Republished in 2003 with an introduction by Bruce Levine (Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2003). We use the 1975 book edition.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Joseph. Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. Logan: Utah State UP, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptman, Robert. Documentation: A History and Critique of Attribution, Commentary, Glosses, Marginalia, Notes, Bibliographies, Works-Cited, Lists, and Citation Indexing and Analysis. Jefferson: McFarland, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hillard, Van E. “Navigating the Social Turn: Information Literacy as Situated Literacy.” Teaching Literary Research: Challenges in a Changing Environment. Ed. Steven Harris and Kathleen Johnson. Chicago: American Library Association, 2009. 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Rebecca Moore, Tricia Serviss, and Tanya K. Rodrigue. “Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences.” Writing and Pedagogy 2.2 (2010): 177–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kinneavy, James L., and Catherine R. Erskine. “Kairos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Written Communication 17 (2000): 432–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, Richard L. “Lloyd Bitzer’s ‘Rhetorical Situation’ and the Classification of Discourse: Problems and Implications,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 3.3 (1970): 165–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, Mark. “Starter Cities: Simulation, Game Design, and the Writing Classroom.” Computers and Composition Online ( Fall 2008): n. pag. Web. 30 Mar. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sheard, Cynthia Miecznikowski. “Kairos and Kenneth Burke’s Psychology of Political and Social Communication.” College English 55.3 (1993): 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipiora, Phillip. “Introduction: The Ancient Concept of Kairos.” Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Phillip Sipiora and James S. Baumlin. Albany: SUNY P, 2002. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Craig R., and Scott Lybarger. “Bitzer’s Model Reconstructed.” Communication Quarterly 44.2 (1996): 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, Brian. “Swales’s ‘Moves’ and the Research Paper Assignment. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 27.4 (2000): 446–51.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, John M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. New York: Cambridge UP, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, John M.. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. New York: Cambridge UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Roger. “Kairos Revisited: An Interview with James Kinneavy.” Rhetoric Review 19.1/2 (2000): 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, Arthur E. “Lloyd Bitzer’s ‘Rhetorical Situation’ and the ‘Exigencies’ of Academic Discourse.” Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Atlanta, GA, 19–21 March 1987. ERIC. Web. 29 March 2011.
   Google Scholar