Stasis Four for Literate Jurisdictions: Writing for an Art World Referee

Works Cited

• Andrus, Jennifer. “Beyond Texts in Context: Recontextualization and the Co-Production of Texts and Contexts in the Legal Discourse, Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay.” Discourse & Society 22.2 (2011): 115–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Allan. “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13 (1984): 145–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezanson, Randall P. Art and Freedom of Speech. U of Illinois P, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. –188 U.S. 239 (1903). N.p., 1903.
   Google Scholar
• Charland, Maurice. “Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Quebecois.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (1987): 133–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosentino, Donald J. “Hip-Hop Assemblage: The Chris Ofili Affair.” African Arts 33.1 (2000): 40–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, Peter. “Recruiting and Nominating Participants for the Brooklyn Museum Controversy: The Contributions of New York City Print Journalists.” Outrage! Art, Controversy, and Society. Ed. Richard Howells, Andreea Deciu Ritivoi, and Judith Schachter. Palgrave, 2012. 66–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, Peter. “Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.2 (2013): 177–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin, Steven C. “How ‘Sensation’ Became a Scandal.” Art in America (Jan. 2000): 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, Christopher. “The Humanist Scholar as Public Expert.” Written Communication 23 (2006): 150–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism.” Textual Dynamics of the Professions : Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1991. 74–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, Jeanne, & Marie Secor “The Stases in Scientific and Literary Argument.” Written Communication 5.4 (1988): 427–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiden, Douglas. “B’klyn Gallery of Horror Gruesome Museum Show Stirs Controversy.” Daily News (1999): Pg. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, Nina. THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, Defendants. Opinion and Order. (99 CV 6071). United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Alan G. “Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity.” Rhetoric Review 23.2 (2004): 141–55.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Christina. Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc.–327 U.S. 146 (1946). N.p., 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Malcolm. “The Substructure of Stasis–Theory from Hermagoras to Hermogenes.” The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 44.01 (1994): 114–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, David S., and Brian S. Butler. Designing Interactive Worlds with Words: Principles of Writing as Representational Composition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, David S., & Brian S. Butler Rhetoric and the Arts of Design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kris, Ernst. Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities P, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, Michael. “Things Made by Words: Reflections on Textual Criticism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 78.2 (1992): 223–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. “Offending Images.” Unsettling Sensation. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Oddo, John. “Discourse-Based Methods Across Texts and Semiotic Modes: Three Tools for Micro-Rhetorical Analysis.” Written Communication 30.3 (2013): 236–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. “Phaedrus.” Complete Works. Trans. Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997. 506–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pope v. Illinois – 481 U.S. 497 (1987). N.p., 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Michael. “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language & Communication 23.3–4 (2003): 193–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatz, Richard E. “The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 6 ( Summer 1973): 154–61.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, Douglas N. Relevance in Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. “Science as a Vocation.” From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Ed. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford UP, 1946. 129–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge UP, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wichelns, Herbert August. “Literary Criticism of Oratory.” The Rhetorical Idiom; Essays in Rhetoric, Oratory, Language, and Drama. Ed. Donald Cross Bryant. New York: Russell & Russell, 1966. 5–42.
   Google Scholar