Tropics of Invention

Works Cited

• Abbott, Don Paul. “Baltasar Gracian’s Agudeza: The Integration of Inventio and Elocutio. ” The Western Journal of Speech Communication 50.2 ( Spring 1986): 133–43.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, Don Paul.. “Splendor and Misery: Semiotics and the End of Rhetorica.” Rhetorica 24.3 ( Summer 2006): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. On Rhetoric. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York and Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bethel, S.L. “The Nature of Metaphysical Wit.” Discussions of John Donne. Ed. Frank Kermode. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co., 1962. 136–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Harold. A Map of Misreading. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Trans. Eleonore Stump. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Kenneth. “Four Master Tropes.” A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P, 1969. 503–17.
   Google Scholar
• Catana, Leo. “Extracts from Emanuele Tesauro: The Aristotelian Telescope.” Vico and Literary Mannerism. New York: Peter Lang, 1999. 111–25.
   Google Scholar
• Catana, Leo. Vico and Literary Mannerism. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Leland Hugh. “Baltasar Gracian’s The Mind’s Wit and Art. ” Trans. Leland Hugh Chambers. Diss. U of Michigan, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. On Oratory and Orators. Trans. J.S. Watson. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP, 1986 [1970].
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. Cicero. Topica. Trans. H.M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Thomas M. “Ramus.” Rhetoric in the European Tradition. New York and London: Longman, 1990. 128–33.
   Google Scholar
• Conville, Richard. “Northrop Frye and and Speech Criticism: An Introduction.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 56.4 ( December 1970): 417–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, Rita. “Medieval Rhetoric: An Overview.” Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas A. Sloane. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 469–79.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, Frank J. A Conceptual Theory of Rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop P, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, Frank J. “The Four Master Tropes: Analogues of Development.” Rhetoric Review 1 (Fall 1992): 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• De Man, Paul. “Semiology and Rhetoric.” Allegories of Reading. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1979. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• De Mille, James. The Elements of Rhetoric. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1878.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York and Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Foulke, Robert, and Paul Smith. An Anatomy of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Northrop. The Educated Imagination. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Northrop. Fables of Identity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Northrop. The Great Code. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, David J. The Science of Rhetoric. New York: Sheldon and Co., 1877.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. “The Metaphoric and Metonymic Poles.” Fundamentals of Language. Roman Jakobson and Morris Halle. Rev. ed. The Hague: Mouton, 1980. 90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Sister Miriam, C.S.C. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, Joan Marie. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces. New York: Pageants P, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, Peter. A History of Classical Renaissance Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. Hillis. “The Critic as Host.” Critical Inquiry 3.3 (1977): 439–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, Michael. Vico in the Tradition of Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, James J. “Topos and Figurae: Historical Cause and Effect?” De Ortu Grammaticae. Ed. G.L. Bursill-Hall, et al. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John, Benjamins P, 1990. 240–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nims, Margaret F., Trans. Poetria Nova of Geoffrey of Vinsauf. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, Donovan J. “Aristotle’s Concept of Formal Topics.” Speech Monographs 36 (November 1969): 419–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, Donovan J. “Cicero’s Topica: A Process View of Invention.” Explorations in Rhetoric. Ed. Ray E. McKerrow. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1982. 107–18.
   Google Scholar
• Plett, Heinrich F. “Figures of Speech.” Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas O. Sloane. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, William M. Ars Poetriae: Rhetorical and Grammatical Invention at the Margin of Literacy. Columbia, SC: U of South Carolina P, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, J. Donald. “Invention in English ‘Stylistic’ Rhetorics: 1600–1800.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 51 (December 1965): 164–67.
   Google Scholar
• Reboul, Olivier. “The Figure and the Argument.” From Metaphysics to Rhetoric. Ed. Michael Meyer. Dordrecht: Klurver Academic P, 1989. 169–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rhetorica Ad Herennium. Trans. Harry Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Donald, and Peter Schofer. Rhetorical Poetics. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, Arturo Zárate. Gracián, Wit, and the Baroque Age. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, John D. Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism. Durham and London: Duke UP, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, John D. “The Use and Misuse of Giambattista Vico: Rhetoric, Orality, and Theories of Discourse.” The New Historicism. Ed. Aram Veeser. New York and London: Routledge, 1982. 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr. “The Cult of Ethnicity: Good and Bad.” Time, July 8, 1991: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A.J. Metaphysical Wit. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Struever, Nancy S. “Vico, Valla, and the Logic of Humanist Inquiry.” Giambattista Vico’s Science of Humanity. Ed. Giorgio Tagliacoggo and Donald Phillip Verene. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976. 173–85.
   Google Scholar
• Trabant, Jürgen. Vico’s New Science of Ancient Signs. Trans. Sean Ward. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Venerable Bede. “Concerning Figures and Tropes.” Trans. Gussie Hecht Tannenhaus. Readings in Medieval Rhetoric. Ed. Joseph M. Miller, Michael H. Prosser, Thomas W. Benson. Bloomington and London: Indiana UP, 1973. 96–122.
   Google Scholar
• Verene, Donald Phillip. Vico’s Science of Imagination. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae). Ed. and Trans. Giorgio A. Pinton and Arthur W. Shippee. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Trans. Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, Heinz. Comparative Psychology of Mental Development. New York: International Universities P, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse. Baltimore and London. John Hopkins UP, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M.J. Gracián Meets Góngora: The Theory and Practice of Wit. Warminster, England: Aria & Phillips Ltd, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M.J. “Gracián, Peregrini, and the Theory of Topics.” The Modern Language Review. 63.4 ( October 1968): 854–63.
   Google Scholar