Embodying Turing’s Machine: Queer, Embodied Rhetorics in the History of Digital Computation

Works Cited

• Anzaldúa, Gloria. “Speaking in Tongues: A Letter to 3rd World Women Writers.” The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Jonathan and Jacqueline Rhodes. “Queer Rhetoric and the Pleasures of the Archive.” Enculturation (2012). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Barbone, Steve. “Alan Mathison Turing.” Reader’s Guide to Lesbian and Gay Studies. Ed. Timothy F. Murphy. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bessette, Jean. “Queer Rhetoric in Situ.” Rhetoric Review 35.2 (2016): 148–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. David. Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bullynck, Maarten, Edgar G. Daylight, and Liesbeth De Mol. “Why Did Computer Science Make a Hero Out of Turing?” Communications of the ACM 58.3 (2015): 37–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge: MIT P, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, Alan. “The Code That Dare Not Speak Its Name: Ashbery-Turing-Roussel.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 19.2 (2008): 214–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia. “The Circuit of Technology: Gender, Identity and Power.” Consuming Technologies. Ed. Eric Hirsh. New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, B. Jack. The Essential Turing. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, B. Jack and Diane Proudfoot. “What Turing Did after He Invented the Universal Turing Machine.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9.4 (2000): 491–509.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Matthew and Michael Faris. “An Annotated Bibliography of LGBTQ Rhetorics.” Present Tense 4.2 (2015). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Matthew and Michael Faris. “‘Breathe Upon Us an Even Flame’: Hephaestus, History, and the Body of Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 25.2 (2006): 119–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. “Metis, Mêtis, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical Bodies across Rhetorical Traditions.” Rhetoric Review 28.1 (2009): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, George. Turing’s Cathedral: The Origins of the Digital Universe. New York: Pantheon, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Easlea, Brian. Fathering the Unthinkable: Masculinity, Scientists and the Nuclear Arms Race. New York: Random House, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Fancher, Patricia. “Composing Artificial Intelligence: Performing Whiteness and Masculinity.” Present Tense 6.1 (2016). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Faris, Michael. “Addressing Normativity in Technical Communication: Putting Technical Communication in Conversation with Queer Theory.” Conference for the Association of Teachers of Technical Communication. March 2015. Tampa, FL. Conference Presentation.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, T. Kenny. Rhetoric in the Flesh: Trained Vision, Technical Expertise, and the Gross Anatomy Lab. New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, Erin A. and Michelle F. Eble. “Technical Rhetorics: Making Specialized Persuasion Apparent to Public Audiences.” Present Tense 2.4 (2015). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Gaboury, Jacob. “A Queer History of Computing.” Rhizome. 19 Feb 2013. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Gaboury, Jacob.. “On Uncomputable Numbers: The Origins of a Queer Computing.” NMC Media-N. 10 July 2013. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Grier, David Alan. When Computers Were Human. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, Keith and Rosalind Gill. The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. New York: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, Thomas. “Actually, Turing Did Not Invent the Computer.” Communications of the ACM 57.1 (2014): 36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna Jeanne. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Marie. Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, Andrew. Alan Turing: The Enigma. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Geoffrey. “The Mind of Mechanical Man.” British Medical Journal 1.4616 (1949): 1105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Maureen, Daisy Levy, Katie Manthey, and Maria Novotny. “Embodiment: Embodying Feminist Rhetorics.” Peitho 18.1 (2015): 39–44. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Natasha N., Kristen R. Moore, and Rebecca Walton. “Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly 25.4 (2016): 211–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, Evelyn Fox. Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. New York: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• King, Homay. Virtual Memory: Time-Based Art and the Dream of Digitality. Durham: Duke UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kittler, Friedrich. “There Is No Software.” Stanford Literature Review 9.1 (1992): 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lassègue, Jean. “What Kind of Turing Test Did Turing Have in Mind?” Tekhnema 3 Spring (1996). Web.
   Google Scholar
• LeMesurier, Jennifer Lin. “Somatic Metaphors: Embodied Recognition of Rhetorical Opportunities.” Rhetoric Review 33.4 (2014): 362–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melfi, Theodore. Hidden Figures. Fox 2000 Pictures, 2017. Film.
   Google Scholar
• Milbourne, Chelsea Redeker, and Sarah Hallenbeck. “Gender, Material Chronotopes, and the Emergence of the Eighteenth-Century Microscope.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43.5 (2013): 401–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, G. Mitchell. “Stranger Relations: The Case for Rebuilding Commonplaces between Rhetoric and Mathematics.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 44.5 (2014): 470–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle, Helmut. “A Note on Enjoying Strawberries with Cream, Making Mistakes, and Other Idiotic Features.” Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker. Ed. Christof Teuscher. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. 353–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, Victor J. Man Enough: Embodying Masculinities. London: SAGE, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Serlin, David. Replaceable You. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Teston, Christa. Bodies in Flux: Scientific Methods for Negotiating Medical Uncertainty. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, Alan. “Can Automatic Calculating Machines Be Said to Think.” Essential Turing. Ed. B. Jack Copeland. New York: Oxford UP, 2004. 476–86.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, Alan.. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” The Essential Turing. Ed. B. Jack Copeland. New York: Oxford UP, 2004. 433–64.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, Alan.. “On Computable Numbers with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.” The Essential Turing. Ed. Jack Copeland. New York: Oxford UP, 2004. 58–90.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. 20th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: MIT P, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, Blay. Artificial Intelligence. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Elizabeth A. Affect and Artificial Intelligence. Seattle: U of Washington P, 2010.
   Google Scholar