Integral Captions and Subtitles: Designing a Space for Embodied Rhetorics and Visual Access

Works Cited

• Armstrong, David. “Deaf Gain in Evolutionary Perspective.” Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Eds. H-Dirksen L. Bauman and Joseph M. Murray. Minneapolis: U of Minneapolis P, 2015. 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bahan, Benjamin. “Upon the Formation of a Visual Variety of the Human Race.” Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. Ed. H-Dirksen L. Bauman. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007. 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Hansel. “DeafSpace: An Architecture toward a More Livable and Sustainable World.” Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Eds. H-Dirksen L. Bauman and Joseph M. Murray. Minneapolis: U of Minneapolis P, 2015. 375–401.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, H-Dirksen L., and Joseph M. Murray. “Deaf Studies in the 21st Century: ‘Deaf-gain’ and the Future of Human Diversity.” The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education. Eds. Marc Marschark and Patricia Elizabeth Spencer. New York: Oxford UP, 2010. 210–25.
   Google Scholar
• ———.“ Deaf Gain: An Introduction.” Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Eds. H-Dirksen L. Bauman and Joseph M. Murray. Minneapolis: U of Minneapolis P, 2015. xv–xlii.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Elizabeth, Cynthia L. Selfe, and Melanie Yergeau. “Creating a Culture of Access in Composition Studies.” Composition Studies 42.2 (2014): 151–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, Tracey, and Carl Whithaus. Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Andy, Rhia Jones, and Mike Crabb. “Dynamic Subtitles: The User Experience.” Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video. Eds. David Geerts, Lieven De Marez, and Caroline Pauwels. Association for Computing Machinery, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, Brenda J. “The Coming Out of Deaf Culture and American Sign Language: An Exploration into Visual Rhetoric and Literacy.” Rhetoric Review 13.2 (1995): 409–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, Brenda J. Deaf Subjects: Between Identities and Places. New York: New York UP, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, Brenda J. “An Enabling Pedagogy.” Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities. Eds. Sharon Snyder, Brenda Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2002. 317–36.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Janine. “Where Access Meets Multimodality: The Case of ASL Music Videos.” Kairos 21.1 (2016): Web.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis, eds. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Del Hierro, Victor, Daisy Levy, and Margaret Price. “We are Here: Negotiating Difference and Alliance in Spaces of Cultural Rhetorics.” Enculturation 21 (2016): Web.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay.“Mapping Composition: Inviting Disability in the Front Door.” Disability and the Teaching of Writing. Eds. Cynthia Lewiecki–Wilson and Brenda Jo Brueggemann. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2008. 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fels, Deborah I., Daniel G. Lee, Carmen Branje, and Matthew Hornburg. “Emotive Captioning and Access to Television.” AMCIS 2005 Proceedings. Association for Information Systems, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fels, Deborah I., Lorelle Polano, Terry Harvey, Singh S. Degan, and Charles Silverman. “Towards Emotive Captioning for Interactive Television.” Proceedings of HCI International 2001. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, Kristie. Embodied Literacies: Imageword and a Process of Teaching. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, Jodi, Johnny Lee, and Scott E. Hudson. “The Kinedit System: Affective Messages Using Dynamic Texts.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Eds. Gilbert Cockton and Panu Korhonen. Association for Computing Machinery, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaudet: The Film. Dir. Ryan Commerson. Gallaudet U, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Halbritter, Bump. Mics, Cameras, Symbolic Action: Audio–Visual Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. Anderson, SC: Parlor P, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• “How Architecture Changes for the Deaf.” YouTube, uploaded by Vox, 2 March 2016. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, Glynda A., and Mark Evan Nelson. “Locating the Semiotic Power of Multimodality.” Written Communication 22.2 (2006): 224–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackerson, Justin. “Why ASL?” ASLized! Journal of American Sign Language and Literature 1(2011): Web.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Rhea Yablon. “Community Converges at Gallaudet Renaissance Event.” On the Green [Washington, DC] 8 April 2010. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, A. Abby. “Bodies of Knowledge: Definitions, Delineations, and Implications of Embodied Writing in the Academy.” Composition Studies 40.2 (2012): 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. New York: Oxford UP, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Daniel G., Deborah I. Fels, and John P. Udo. “Emotive Captioning.” Computers in Entertainment: CIE–Interactive TV 5.2 (2007): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lueck, Amy. “Writing a Translingual Script: Closed Captions in the English Multilingual Hearing Classroom.” Kairos 17.3 (2013). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Lunsford, Andrea, Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Education Review 66.1 (1996): 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Sigrid. “Multimodal Discourse Analysis: A Conceptual Framework.” Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Eds. Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon. Washington, DC: Georgetown UP, 2004. 101–15.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeri, Jason. Remixing Composition: A History of Multimodal Writing Pedagogy. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Perego, Elisa, et al. “The Cognitive Effectiveness of Subtitle Processing.” Media Psychology 13 (2010): 243–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “TEDxIslay - Wayne Betts Jr - Deaf Lens.” YouTube, uploaded by TEDx Talks, 22 June 2010. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Udo, John-Patrick, and Deborah I. Fels. “The Rogue Poster-Children of Universal Design: Closed Captioning and Audio Description.” Journal of Engineering Design 21.2–3 (2010): 207–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. “About Images and Multimodality: A Personal Account.” Interactions, Images, and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality. Eds. Sigrid Norris and Carmen Daniela Maier. Boston: de Gruyter Mouton, 2014. 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James C., and Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson. “Disability, Rhetoric, and the Body.” Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Eds. James C. Wilson and Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 2001. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wysocki, Anne Frances. “Opening New Media to Writing: Openings and Justifications.” Writing New Media: Theory and Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition. Eds. Anne Frances Wysocki, Johndan Johnson–Eilola, Cynthia L., and Geoffrey Sirc. Logan, UT: Utah State UP Selfe, 2004. 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Yergeau, Melanie, et al. “Multimodality in Motion: Disability and Kairotic Spaces.” Kairos 18.1 (2013). Web.
   Google Scholar
• Zdenek, Sean. Reading Sounds: Closed-Captioned Media and Popular Culture. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2015.
   Google Scholar