The “My Online Friends” Religious Enclave: Expanding the Definition and Possibilities of Enclaved Discourses

Works Cited

• Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. U of Chicago P, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, Robert and Daniel C. Brouwer. “Introduction: Reconfigurations of the Public Sphere.” Counterpublics and the State. SUNY P, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Wendy. Ethnographic Writing Research: Writing It Down, Writing It Up, and Reading It. Heinemann, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Marilyn. “Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted,” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 3, 2011, pp. 420–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derr, Jill Mulvay. “‘Strength in Our Union’: The Making of Mormon Sisterhood.” Sisters in Spirit, edited by Maureen Ursenbach Beecher and Lavina Fielding Anderson, U of Illinois P, 1987, pp. 153–207
   Google Scholar
• Fernback, Jan. “There Is a There: Notes Toward a Definition of Cybercommunity.” Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, edited by Steve Jones, SAGE, 1999, pp. 203–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” The Phantom Public Sphere, edited by Bruce Robbins, U of Minnesota P, 1993. pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gere, Anne Ruggles. Literacy and Cultural Work in U.S. Women’s Clubs, 1880-1920. U of Illinois P, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Joseph. “Beyond Community: From the Social to the Material.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 20, no. 2, 2001, pp. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, Gerald. Vernacular Voices. U of South Carolina P, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• —. Prisoners of Conscience: Moral Vernaculars of Political Agency. University of South Carolina P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, Gerald and erin mcclellan. “Vernacular Rhetoric and Social Movements: Performance of Resistance in the Rhetoric of the Everyday.” Active Voices: Composing a Rhetoric of Social Movements, edited by Sharon McKenzie Stevens and Patricia Malesh, SUNY P, 2009, pp 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Robert Glenn. Digital Jesus: The Making of New Christian Fundamentalist Community on the Internet. New York UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• —. “The Vernacular Web of Participatory Media.” Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol 25, no 5, 2008. pp. 490–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil, Michael L, Judith A. Langer, and Timothy Shanahan. Understanding Reading and Writing Research. Allyn & Bacon, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, Gesa E. Ethical Dilemmas in Feminist Research. The Politics of Location, Interpretation, and Publication. SUNY P, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. “Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity.” Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Seyla Benhabib, Princeton UP, 1996, pp. 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Beverly. J. “Ethnography and Compositon: Studying Language at Home.” Methods and Methodology in Composition, edited by Gesa Kirsch and Patricia A. Sullivan, Southern Illinois UP, 1992, pp.153–71.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Priscilla. “‘A Radical Conversion of the Mind:’ Fundamentalism, Hermeneutics, and the Metanoic Classroom.” College English, vol. 63, no. 5, 2001, pp. 585–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, Irving. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Teachers College P, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Sharon McKenzie and Patricia Malesh. Active Voices: Composing a Rhetoric of Social Movements. SUNY P, 2009, pp 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass. “Fragmentation and Cybercascades.” Republic.com. Princeton UP, pp. 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone, 2002.
   Google Scholar