Who Cares if Johnny Writes with a Pencil? Or, a Hauntological Historiography of Materiality in Composition-Rhetoric

Works Cited

• Ballif, Michelle. “Historiography as Hauntology: Paranormal Investigations Into the History of Rhetoric.” Theorizing Histories of Rhetoric, edited by Michelle Ballif, Southern Illinois UP, 2013, pp. 139–53.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• —. “Posthuman Performativity.” Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Aliamo and Susan Hekman, Indiana UP, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• —. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today, vol. 3, no. 2, 2010, pp. 240–68.
   Google Scholar
• —. “On Touching—The Inhuman That I Therefore Am.” differences, vol. 23, no. 3, 2012, pp. 206–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Scott and Casey Boyle. Rhetoric Through Everyday Things. U of Alabama P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke UP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, Lloyd. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 1, 1968, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey. Rhetoric as Posthuman Practice. Ohio SUP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, James & Nathaniel Rivers. “Ecomunium of QWERTY.” Rhetoric Through Everyday Things, edited by Scott Barnett and Casey Boyle, U of Alabama P, 2016, pp. 212–25.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Kenneth. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. University of California P, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, Robert. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. U of Pittsburgh P, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke UP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Corder, James. “What I Learned at School.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 26, no. 4, 1975, pp. 330–34.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, Sharron. Toward Civil Discourse: Rhetoric and Fundamentalism. U of Pittsburgh P, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Diane and Michelle Ballif. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Pushing the Limits of the Anthropos.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 47, no. 4, 2014, pp. 346–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International, trans. by Peggy Kamuf. Routledge, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Edbauer-Rice, Jenny. “Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes, Kendall. “Rhetorical Futurity, or Desiring Theory.” Reinventing (with) Theory in Rhetoric and Writing Studies: Essays in Honor of Sharon Crowley, edited by Andrea Alden, Kendall Gerdes, Judy Holiday, and Ryan Skinnell, Utah State UP, 2019, pp. 231–42.
   Google Scholar
• Grant-Davie, Keith. “Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 15, no. 2, 1997, pp. 269–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie. “Iconographic Tracking: A Digital Research Method for Visual Rhetoric and Circulation Studies.” Computers and Composition, vol. 30, no. 4, 2013, pp. 332–48.
   Google Scholar
• —. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Utah State UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hawhee, Debra. “Rhetoric’s Sensorium.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 101, no. 1, 2015, pp. 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. Harper & Row, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, Stuart. Investigations. Oxford UP, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of the Science Studies. Harvard UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• —. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford UP, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• LeMesurier, Jennifer. “Mobile Bodies: Triggering Bodily Uptake Through Movement.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 68, no. 2, 2016, pp. 292–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Christian and Joshua Gunn. ‘“Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Human Subject, or, Continuing the ARS Conversation.” Rhetoric Society of America, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Paul and Nathaniel Rivers. Thinking with Bruno Latour in Rhetoric and Composition. Southern Illinois UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Lucille. “A Stranger in Strange Lands: A College Student Writing Across the Curriculum.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 21, no. 3, 1987, pp. 233–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muckelbauer, John. “Implicit Paradigms of Rhetoric: Aristotelian, Cultural, and Heliotropic.” Rhetoric through Everyday Things, edited by Scott Barnett and Casey Boyle, University of Alabama P, 2016, pp. 212–25.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Donald. “All Writing is Autobiography.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 42, no. 1, 1991, pp. 66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert, Thomas. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. U of Pittsburgh P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roozen, Kevin. “Tracing Trajectories of Practice: Repurposing in One Student’s Developing Disciplinary Writing Processes.” Written Communication, vol. 27, no. 3, 2010, pp. 318–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinnell, Ryan. “Who Cares if Rhetoricians Landed on the Moon? Or, a Plea for Reviving the Politics of Historiography.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 34, no. 2, 2015, pp. 111–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, Shannon. Rhetorical Touch: Disability, Identification, Haptics. U of South Carolina P, 2014.
   Google Scholar